Difference between revisions of "October surprise"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Another busy bunch of guys...)
 
(Perpetrators)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|start=1980
 
|start=1980
 
|end=1980
 
|end=1980
 +
|perpetrators=The Cabal
 
|description=A secret deal which offered the Iranians weapons in return for their preventing the release of the US embassy hostages before the  1980 US presidential election.  
 
|description=A secret deal which offered the Iranians weapons in return for their preventing the release of the US embassy hostages before the  1980 US presidential election.  
 
|wikipedia=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_Surprise_conspiracy_theory
 
|wikipedia=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_Surprise_conspiracy_theory
Line 14: Line 15:
 
===Problems===
 
===Problems===
  
Evidence has continued to mount that the so-called "theory" is in fact correct. Suspicious deaths of people investigating the story and some of those who may have had key evidence have prompted others to go on the record and testify that there ''was'', in fact, a conspiracy. Even Wikipedia acknowledges this (though the page title steadfastly categorises it as a 'conspiracy ''theory'''), and contains a bunch of interesting material.
+
Evidence has continued to mount that the so-called "theory" is in fact correct. Suspicious deaths of people investigating the story and some of those who may have had key evidence have prompted others to go on the record and testify that there ''was'', in fact, a conspiracy. Even [[Wikipedia]] acknowledges this (though the page title steadfastly categorises it as a 'conspiracy ''theory'''), and contains a bunch of interesting material.
  
 
Enquiry chair, [[Lee H. Hamilton]], appears to have been chosen as a safe pair of hands to settle an {{on}} - he has a history of such. However, in 2013, Hamilton was emailed about [[file:2007-0491-F,Folder1,Part5-b(dragged).pdf|a recently released memo]] which revealed that in 1991 a deputy White House counsel working for then-President [[George H.W. Bush]] was notified by the [[State Department]] that Reagan’s campaign director [[William Casey]] ''had'' taken a trip to Madrid, something that was concealed from the House October Surprise Task Force. In the face of such evidence, even Hamilton admits to having "second thoughts".<ref>http://consortiumnews.com/2013/06/08/second-thoughts-on-october-surprise/</ref>
 
Enquiry chair, [[Lee H. Hamilton]], appears to have been chosen as a safe pair of hands to settle an {{on}} - he has a history of such. However, in 2013, Hamilton was emailed about [[file:2007-0491-F,Folder1,Part5-b(dragged).pdf|a recently released memo]] which revealed that in 1991 a deputy White House counsel working for then-President [[George H.W. Bush]] was notified by the [[State Department]] that Reagan’s campaign director [[William Casey]] ''had'' taken a trip to Madrid, something that was concealed from the House October Surprise Task Force. In the face of such evidence, even Hamilton admits to having "second thoughts".<ref>http://consortiumnews.com/2013/06/08/second-thoughts-on-october-surprise/</ref>

Revision as of 11:15, 17 December 2014

Event.png October surprise (conspiracy) Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Date1980
PerpetratorsThe Cabal
Interest ofHouse October Surprise Task Force, Robert Parry, Dirk Stoffberg
DescriptionA secret deal which offered the Iranians weapons in return for their preventing the release of the US embassy hostages before the 1980 US presidential election.

Official narrative

The October surprise conspiracy theory is the claim that a deal worked out by during the 1980 US presidential election between the team of Ronald Reagan and the Iranians to prevent the successful resolution to the Iran hostage crisis just before the 1980 election which would have gived Jimmy Carter an electoral boost. The timing of the event was obviously suggestive (the hostages were released hours after Reagan was inaugurated), and this theory was investigated for years afterwards by independent journalists.

In March 1992 the House October Surprise Task Force was convened, supposedly to investigate the truth of this theory. Following the publication of its final report in January 1993, the Task Force chairman Rep. Lee H. Hamilton published an editorial in The New York Times summarising the Task Force conclusion that "there was virtually no credible evidence to support the accusations."[1]

Problems

Evidence has continued to mount that the so-called "theory" is in fact correct. Suspicious deaths of people investigating the story and some of those who may have had key evidence have prompted others to go on the record and testify that there was, in fact, a conspiracy. Even Wikipedia acknowledges this (though the page title steadfastly categorises it as a 'conspiracy theory'), and contains a bunch of interesting material.

Enquiry chair, Lee H. Hamilton, appears to have been chosen as a safe pair of hands to settle an official narrative - he has a history of such. However, in 2013, Hamilton was emailed about File:2007-0491-F,Folder1,Part5-b(dragged).pdf which revealed that in 1991 a deputy White House counsel working for then-President George H.W. Bush was notified by the State Department that Reagan’s campaign director William Casey had taken a trip to Madrid, something that was concealed from the House October Surprise Task Force. In the face of such evidence, even Hamilton admits to having "second thoughts".[2]

Suspicious deaths

In 1991, freelance writer Danny Casolaro (among others)[3] claimed to be almost ready to expose the October surprise conspiracy, when he suddenly suffered a violent and premature death.

Contradictory testimonies

Former CIA pilot John Lear, told a pilots' group in 2004 how he made a covert flight of arms to Iran as a payment part of the exchange, making it effectively a precursor to the Iran-Contra affair:

"George H. W. Bush was flown in a BAC 111 one Saturday night to Paris to meet with the Ayatollah Khomeini. Bush offered... Khomeini a deal whereby if he would delay the release of the hostages held in Tehran until Reagan’s inauguration, the administration would supply unlimited guns and ammunition to the Iranians. In order to get Bush back for a Sunday morning brunch so that nobody would be alerted to his absence he was flown back in an SR-71 from Reims field near Paris to McGuire AFB. Of course Reagan won, the hostages were released and one of my jobs in Cairo was to deliver those arms from Tel Aviv to Tehran. Unfortunately, the first airplane in, an Argentinean CL-44 was shot down by the Russians just south of Yerevan and Mossad who was running the operation didn't want to risk sending my 707. The arms [were] eventually delivered through Dubai, across the Persian Gulf and directly into Tehran."[4]


Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References

  1. Lee H. Hamilton, New York Times, 24 January 1993, DIALOGUE: Last Word on the October Surprise?; Case Closed
  2. http://consortiumnews.com/2013/06/08/second-thoughts-on-october-surprise/
  3. Linsalata, Phil. The Octopus File, The Columbia Journalism Review, November/December 1991, accessed October 20, 2008.
  4. John Lear speech to Quiet Birdman Association in Las Vegas in 2004, [1]