Property talk:Has website

Marginal use case of this

Currently, this is mapped to foaf:website, which relates people to their homepage. This is OK for people and groups, but I think it won't do for website pages->URLs, because the relationship is more like "Has URL". Hence, it might be better to not use this in template:Website, which may want a different property. I'll sleep on it. Robin (talk) 21:15, 6 January 2014 (GMT)

Yes. I've had a quick look at the existing template code. The declaration 'Has website' in it may not produce a coding circularity but it is a semantic non-sequitur to say that a website has a website if the website it has is itself !!! --Peter P (talk) 07:41, 7 January 2014 (GMT)