User talk:SeamusPadraig

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Wikispooks!

We're glad you came. There's lots to do.
The Community portal is probably the best place to start for new users. To add a Wikispooks search facility to your browser, go here. If you've got a topic you're itching to write about, just dive in. If you're not sure where to start, you can introduce yourself by editing either this page or your user page. Peter P (talk) 07:49, 21 May 2014 (IST)

Hi Seamus. You have probably noticed my reply to your info on the Talk:Christopher Bollyn page. Any help you can provide on the Ukraine sniper incident will be most welcome. Please don't feel daunted by the techie aspects of editing/authoring. Best to just dive in. On this subject in particular, you will get all the help you may need. --Peter P (talk) 07:04, 22 May 2014 (IST)
Thanks for your reply, Peter. The technical problem isn't the only one though. I was finally able to track down your licencing/copyright policy, and I'm wondering if posting a translation of a TV transcript would violate copyright law and get you (or me!) in trouble. The show was originally broadcast in German on the TV network ARD. I could be wrong, but I find it unlikely they would approve of my posting a translation of it here. Any thoughts on the subject? Again, many thanks... Seamus
Frankly I'm not bothered by that as a copyright issue. We will always seek to both acknowledge copyright and respect copyright-holder rights, reasonably implemented and certainly in so far as they are used to protect livelihood. However, we are not a commercial site and do not earn anything from publishing copyrighted work. The judgement about whether to publish without express permission ( and there is a lot of such work on Wikispooks) is one of public interest and in this case, where the information is publicly available in another country/language, posting a translated transcript in a different language is clearly in the public interest. If the copyright holder disagrees, then he/she can object and I'll consider the objection. In short - go ahead. --Peter P (talk) 17:44, 25 May 2014 (IST)