Difference between revisions of "Vela Incident"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Import from SA Nukes articles)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
}}
 
}}
 
The '''Vela Incident''', also known as the '''South Atlantic Flash''', was a "double flash" of light detected by an American Vela Hotel satellite on September 22, 1979, near the Prince Edward Islands off Antarctica, which many believe was of nuclear origin. The most widespread theory among those who believe the flash was of nuclear origin is that it resulted from a joint [[South African]]-[[Israel]]i nuclear test.
 
The '''Vela Incident''', also known as the '''South Atlantic Flash''', was a "double flash" of light detected by an American Vela Hotel satellite on September 22, 1979, near the Prince Edward Islands off Antarctica, which many believe was of nuclear origin. The most widespread theory among those who believe the flash was of nuclear origin is that it resulted from a joint [[South African]]-[[Israel]]i nuclear test.
 +
 +
In September 1979 a US Vela satellite detected a double flash over the Indian Ocean that was suspected, but never confirmed to be a nuclear test, despite extensive air sampling by Boeing WC-135 Constant Phoenix aircraft of the United States Air Force. If the Vela Incident was a nuclear test, [[South Africa]] is one of the countries, possibly in collaboration with Israel, that is suspected of carrying it out. No official confirmation of its being a nuclear test has been made by South Africa, and expert agencies have disagreed on their assessments. In 1997, South African Deputy Foreign Minister [[Aziz Pahad]] stated that South Africa ''had'' conducted a test, but later retracted his statement as being a report of rumours.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Safrica/Vela.html |title=Aziz Pahad's statement and retraction discussed here |publisher=Nuclearweaponarchive.org |accessdate=15 May 2011}}</ref>
 +
 +
In February 1994 Commodore Dieter Gerhardt, former commander of South Africa's Simon's Town naval base who was later convicted of spying for the USSR, was reported to have said:
 +
{{cquote|Although I was not directly involved in planning or carrying out the operation, I learned unofficially that the flash was produced by an Israeli-South African test code-named ''Operation Phoenix''. The explosion was clean and was not supposed to be detected. But they were not as smart as they thought, and the weather changed - so the Americans were able to pick it up.<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=vgwAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA15 Proliferation: A flash from the past] David Albright, [http://thebulletin.org ''The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists''] Nov 1997, pp. 15</ref>}}
 +
 +
In 2000, Gerhardt claimed that Israel agreed in 1974 to arm eight Jericho II missiles with "special warheads" for South Africa.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=PBS Newshour |date=2 May 2005  |title=Tracking Nuclear Proliferation |url=http://www.pbs.org/newshour/indepth_coverage/military/proliferation/countries/s-africa.html}}</ref>
 +
 +
In 2010, ''The Guardian'' released South African government documents that it alleged confirmed the existence of Israel's nuclear arsenal, and were associated with an Israeli offer to sell South Africa nuclear weapons in 1975.<ref>{{cite news
 +
|title=Revealed: how Israel offered to sell South Africa nuclear weapons
 +
|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/may/23/israel-south-africa-nuclear-weapons
 +
|work=The Guardian |location=UK |date=24 May 2010| first=Chris| last=McGreal| accessdate=24 May 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=The memos and minutes that confirm Israel's nuclear stockpile|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/may/23/israel-south-africa-nuclear-documents
 +
|work=The Guardian |location=UK |date=24 May 2010| first=Chris| last=McGreal| accessdate=24 May 2010}}</ref> Israel categorically denied these allegations and said that the documents do not indicate any offer for a sale of nuclear weapons. Israeli President [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shimon_Peres Shimon Peres] said that ''The Guardian'' article was based on "selective interpretation... and not on concrete facts."<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/25/world/middleeast/25israel.html | work=The New York Times | title=Israel Denies It Offered South Africa Warheads | first=Isabel | last=Kershner | date=24 May 2010}}</ref>
 +
 +
Avner Cohen, author of ''Israel and the Bomb'' and ''The Worst-Kept Secret: Israel's Bargain with the Bomb'', said:
 +
:"Nothing in the documents suggests there was an actual offer by Israel to sell nuclear weapons to the regime in Pretoria."<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/avner-cohen-yitzhak-rabin-would-have-opposed-sale-of-nuclear-weapons-1981962.html | location=London | work=The Independent | title=Avner Cohen: Yitzhak Rabin would have opposed sale of nuclear weapons | date=25 May 2010}}</ref>
 +
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{Reflist}}
 
{{Reflist}}
{{Stub}}
 

Revision as of 00:49, 13 March 2016

Event.png Vela Incident Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png

The Vela Incident, also known as the South Atlantic Flash, was a "double flash" of light detected by an American Vela Hotel satellite on September 22, 1979, near the Prince Edward Islands off Antarctica, which many believe was of nuclear origin. The most widespread theory among those who believe the flash was of nuclear origin is that it resulted from a joint South African-Israeli nuclear test.

In September 1979 a US Vela satellite detected a double flash over the Indian Ocean that was suspected, but never confirmed to be a nuclear test, despite extensive air sampling by Boeing WC-135 Constant Phoenix aircraft of the United States Air Force. If the Vela Incident was a nuclear test, South Africa is one of the countries, possibly in collaboration with Israel, that is suspected of carrying it out. No official confirmation of its being a nuclear test has been made by South Africa, and expert agencies have disagreed on their assessments. In 1997, South African Deputy Foreign Minister Aziz Pahad stated that South Africa had conducted a test, but later retracted his statement as being a report of rumours.[1]

In February 1994 Commodore Dieter Gerhardt, former commander of South Africa's Simon's Town naval base who was later convicted of spying for the USSR, was reported to have said:

Although I was not directly involved in planning or carrying out the operation, I learned unofficially that the flash was produced by an Israeli-South African test code-named Operation Phoenix. The explosion was clean and was not supposed to be detected. But they were not as smart as they thought, and the weather changed - so the Americans were able to pick it up.[2]

In 2000, Gerhardt claimed that Israel agreed in 1974 to arm eight Jericho II missiles with "special warheads" for South Africa.[3]

In 2010, The Guardian released South African government documents that it alleged confirmed the existence of Israel's nuclear arsenal, and were associated with an Israeli offer to sell South Africa nuclear weapons in 1975.[4][5] Israel categorically denied these allegations and said that the documents do not indicate any offer for a sale of nuclear weapons. Israeli President Shimon Peres said that The Guardian article was based on "selective interpretation... and not on concrete facts."[6]

Avner Cohen, author of Israel and the Bomb and The Worst-Kept Secret: Israel's Bargain with the Bomb, said:

"Nothing in the documents suggests there was an actual offer by Israel to sell nuclear weapons to the regime in Pretoria."[7]


Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References

  1. "Aziz Pahad's statement and retraction discussed here". Nuclearweaponarchive.org. Retrieved 15 May 2011.Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "Scribunto").
  2. Proliferation: A flash from the past David Albright, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Nov 1997, pp. 15
  3. "Tracking Nuclear Proliferation". PBS Newshour. 2 May 2005.Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "Scribunto").
  4. {{URL|example.com|optional display text}}
  5. {{URL|example.com|optional display text}}
  6. {{URL|example.com|optional display text}}
  7. {{URL|example.com|optional display text}}