Difference between revisions of "Violent extremism"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(CH)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
==History==
 
==History==
 
[[image:Google trend violent extremism.png|720px|left]]
 
[[image:Google trend violent extremism.png|720px|left]]
"Violent extremism" was introduced after the [[7/7]] bombings. In 2013, [[Wikipedia]] created a redirect page to "[[Extremism]]". In December 2016‎ this was expanded into a full article.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Violent_extremism&action=history</ref>
+
"Violent extremism" was introduced after the [[7/7]] bombings and the use was expanded most notably after the [[Charlie Hebdo]] event. In 2013, [[Wikipedia]] created a redirect page to "[[Extremism]]". In December 2016‎ this was expanded into a full article.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Violent_extremism&action=history</ref>
  
 
==Legal status==
 
==Legal status==

Revision as of 21:47, 1 August 2017

Concept.png "Violent extremism" 
(enemy image)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Interest of• Counter Extremism Project
• International Center for the Study of Violent Extremism
• Amil Khan
• Alex Schmid

"Violent extremism" is an enemy image which was introduced in July 2005 as a synonym of the contested word "terrorism". After laws were introduced, in January 2011 the phrase "non-violent extremism" was launched to try to extend these laws towards the explicitly non-violent.

History

Google trend violent extremism.png

"Violent extremism" was introduced after the 7/7 bombings and the use was expanded most notably after the Charlie Hebdo event. In 2013, Wikipedia created a redirect page to "Extremism". In December 2016‎ this was expanded into a full article.[1]

Legal status

The Quilliam Foundation "has long argued for a tougher line on non-violent extremism".[2]

Internet censorship

USAID violent extremism.jpg

In July 2017, YouTube announced that they would be modifying their website "to provide more resources and more content that can help change minds of people at risk of being radicalized". In practice, this seems to allied to the "war on terror" project.[3]


 

Related Quotations

PageQuoteAuthorDate
"Extremism"“the distinction between “non-violent extremism” and “violent extremism” is not a valid one.”Alex SchmidMay 2014
"Non-violent extremism"“It can even be argued that ‘non-violent extremism’ is a contradiction in terms. While there can be non-violent and violent radicals, it makes, in my view and based on the distinction between radicalism and extremism elaborated above, less sense to distinguish between violent and non-violent extremists.”Alex SchmidMarch 2013
Fatima LahnaitSpain remains a target for Islamist extremists. Moreover, like other European countries, it is now facing an increasing radicalisation phenomenon that may lead to violent extremism and home-grown Islamist terrorism.”Fatima Lahnait2018
Peter Neumann“No one I know has done more on the ground with practical experience countering violent extremism than Hanif Qadir. His experience and expertise is something we can all learn from. For anyone interested in counter-extremism, his book is an absolute must read.”Peter Neumann
Religion“Some years ago, a leaked MI5 behavioural study of pathways to terrorism concluded that there was no single profile or pathway to violent radicalisation. It also found, contrary to conventional assumptions, that religious conservatism tended to act as a bulwark against extremism.”Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed13 February 2015
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References


57px-Notepad icon.png This is a page stub. Please add to it.