File:EUEdoc10957.pdf

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search

EUEdoc10957.pdf(file size: 690 KB, MIME type: application/pdf)

Disclaimer (#3)Document.png report of unknown authorship dated 12 June 2006
Subjects: Extraordinary Rendition
Source: Council of Europe

★ Start a Discussion about this document



Alleged secret detentions and unlawful inter-state transfers of detainees involving Council of Europe member states

Report - 12 June 2006

Summary

Our analysis of the CIA 'rendition' programme has revealed a network that resembles a 'spider’s web' spun across the globe. The analysis is based on official information provided by national and international air traffic control authorities, as well as on other information. This 'web' is composed of several landing points, which we have subdivided into different categories, and which are linked up among themselves by civilian planes used by the CIA or military aircraft.

Analysis of the network’s functioning and of ten individual cases allows us to make a number of conclusions both about human rights violations – some of which continue – and about the responsibilities of some Council of Europe Member states, which are bound by the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture.

The United States, an observer state of our Organisation, actually created this reprehensible network, which we criticise in light of the values shared on both sides of the Atlantic. But we also believe having established that it is only through the intentional or grossly negligent collusion of the European partners that this “web” was able to spread also over Europe.

Whilst hard evidence, at least according to the strict meaning of the word, is still not forthcoming, a number of coherent and converging elements indicate that secret detention centres have indeed existed and unlawful inter-state transfers have taken place in Europe. It is not intended to pronounce that the authorities of these countries are ‘guilty’ for having tolerated secret detention sites, but rather it is to hold them ‘responsible’ for failing to comply with the positive obligation to diligently investigate any serious allegation of fundamental rights violations.

The draft resolution and recommendation propose different measures so that terrorism can be fought effectively whilst respecting human rights at the same time.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeDimensionsUserComment
current07:57, 13 September 2011 (690 KB)Peter (talk | contribs)
  • You cannot overwrite this file.

There are no pages that use this file.