File:The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites.pdf

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The_Top_Ten_Connections_Between_NIST_and_Nano-Thermites.pdf(file size: 82 KB, MIME type: application/pdf)

An examination of NIST's connections to the nano-thermite.

Disclaimer (#3)Document.png paper  by Kevin R. Ryan dated 2 July 2008
Subjects: 9-11/WTC Controlled demolition, Nano-thermite, NIST
Source: Unknown

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

★ Start a Discussion about this document
The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites

“Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? … NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.” - NIST Responses to FAQs, August 2006

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has had considerable difficulty determining a politically correct sequence of events for the unprecedented destruction of three World Trade Center (WTC) buildings on 9/11 (Douglas 2006, Ryan 2006, Gourley 2007). But despite a number of variations in NIST’s story, it never considered explosives or pyrotechnic materials in any of its hypotheses. This omission is at odds with several other striking facts; first, the requirement of the national standard for fire investigation (NFPA 921), which calls for testing related to thermite and other pyrotechnics, and second, the extensive experience NIST investigators have with explosive and thermite materials.

One of the most intriguing aspects of NIST’s diversionary posture has been their total lack of interest in explosive or pyrotechnic features in their explanations. Despite the substantial evidence for the use of explosives at the WTC (Jones 2006, Legge and Szamboti 2007), and the extensive expertise in explosives among NIST investigators (Ryan 2007), explosives were never considered in the NIST WTC investigation. Only after considerable criticism of this fact did NIST deign to add one small disclaimer to their final report on the towers, suggesting they found no evidence for explosives.

The extensive evidence that explosives were used at the WTC includes witness testimony (MacQueen 2006), overwhelming physical evidence (Griffin 2005, Hoffman et al 2005, Jones and Legge et al 2008) and simple common sense (Legge 2007). There is also substantial evidence that aluminothermic (thermite) materials were present at the WTC (Jones 2007), and the presence of such materials can explain the existence of intense fire where it would not otherwise have existed. Additionally, despite agreement from all parties that the assumed availability of fuel allowed for the fires in any given location of each of the WTC buildings to last only twenty minutes (NIST 2007), the fires lasted much longer and produced extreme temperatures (Jones and Farrer et al 2008)...

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

current05:43, 13 September 2010 (82 KB)Peter (talk | contribs)NIST Connections to Nano-Thermite Category:9/11
  • You cannot overwrite this file.

There are no pages that use this file.