(Polarising perspective, Victim blaming, “Disaster”, Science/Problematic_notions)
|Interest of||• "Smart city"|
• David Attenborough
• Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
• Club of Rome
• Paul Ehrlich
• Chris Elias
• Bill Gates
• Jane Goodall
• Yuval Harari
• Hewlett Foundation
• Boris Johnson
• Stanley Johnson
• David MacEachron
• Thomas Malthus
• Philip Mountbatten
• New Order of Barbarians
• Population Council
• Population Institute
• Population Matters
• John Davison Rockefeller III
• Sierra Club
• Peter Singer
• The Good Club
• The Great Reset
• Ted Turner
• UN/Population Fund
|A less obviously racist replacement for eugenics, designed to shift focus away from over consumption.|
"Overpopulation" is a word used to suggest that there are too many humans on earth, or too many in certain areas. The idea is not new: in 1798, Malthus stated that population grows geometrically where as food supply grows only linear. "Overpopulation" was an argument to discredit the poor at the time (Lewontin). It is typically used by people in countries with relatively low (but rich) populations that are high consumers of material goods. The term is also a replacement for the word "eugenics", which was discredited after the defeat of the Nazis in 1945.
- 1 Victim blaming
- 2 Significance in Geopolitics
- 3 Advocates
- 4 Georgia Guidestones
- 5 Indirect support by "science"
- 6 Debunking Malthusian claims
- 7 External links
- 8 Examples
- 9 Related Quotations
- 10 Related Documents
- 11 References
- Full article: Population control
- Full article: Population control
The word "overpopulation", and a lot of the associated dogma and language conjures a simple frame of scarcity by sharing a fixed amount of things between too many people. To the extent that this overlooks a history and/or present of plunder by colonial powers (i.e. "developed" nation states) it is a form of victim blaming: people here are poor because there are too many of them, not because the country has been looted by foreigners determined to get more resources which they themselves deplete at an unjustifiable high rate.
Significance in Geopolitics
"People are the only vital raw material for building human societies. Without people, the most elegant architectures and the most advanced infrastructures are nothing but archeological marvels waiting to be recognized. With people, a handful of sands in desolate landscapes could turn into a flourishing civilization. This simple most essential fact did not escape the attention of, nor was it dismissed so callously by any people of any generation bar those of our modern era. Historically, if a society wished to thrive and prosper on social, cultural, economic, and scientific grounds, or any other human concerns, its most rudimentary first step was to grow its population. A population that does not physically grow, stagnates and withers away. Along the same lines, if a society was deemed as an impediment to expansionists who coveted its lands and resources, the mechanism for the aggressor was rather simple: reduce that society’s population by killing as many of its people as possible if you are interested in a cross-sectional plunder. Kill or capture as many of its women of child-bearing age as possible to stop it from growing if you are determined to make your loot absolute."
The Nobel Prize winner Frank Macfarlane Burnet, who once received a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation, in 1947 secretly urged the Australian government to develop biological weapons for use against Indonesia and other overpopulated countries of South-East Asia, by targeting food crops and spreading infectious diseases.
Jonas Salk, an American virologist and medical researcher, who developed one of the first successful polio vaccines argues in his 1973 book: "Survival of the Wisest", that as much as population growth has been a factor for survival of the human species in the past, now population control becomes a factor for survival.
National Security Study Memorandum 200
NSSM 200 from December 10, 1974, also called 'The Kissinger report', concluded that: "a far larger, high-level effort is needed [...] to bring population growth under control" and "although world population growth is widely recognized within the Government as a current danger of the highest magnitude calling for urgent measures, it does not rank high on the agendas of conversations with leaders of other nations".
Under Policy Recommendations it says:
- 28. World policy and programs in the population field should incorporate two major objectives:
- (a) actions to accommodate continued population growth up to 6 billions by the mid-21st century without massive starvation or total frustration of developmental hopes; and
- (b) actions to keep the ultimate level as close as possible to 8 billions rather than permitting it to reach 10 billions, 13 billions, or more.
"[...] the original intent of ‘population control’ was to protect US access to raw resources and maintain US global supremacy. US family policies did not first identify woman as the object to be controlled, but policies have changed such that women's bodies have become a symbolic representation of – and site of resistance to – the power relationships between the US and developing states. The change in the rhetoric – from population control to family planning, women's empowerment, environmental sustainability and human rights – does not mean the ‘rules’ enforced by the hegemon have changed so much as it indicates a process of identity formation occurring through the implementation of these rules.
The history of US family planning policies is a story of national security issues played out on women’s bodies, in the developing world and within the shifting discourses of women’s empowerment, environmental protection and resource control. US funding for family planning programs continues to inflame passions on both sides of the debate: family planning either represents an imperative of a woman’s right to reproductive choice or is in conflict with conservative values and the right to life. US domestic debates over abortion rights are played out on the international stage as successive administrations defend or weaken international family planning programs. These political and rhetorical positions, however, belie American foreign policy goals that have been in place since the 1960s and 1970s, when policy makers identified overpopulation as a serious threat to the world’s resources and American security concerns.
The 'Global 2000 Report to the President' from August 1, 1980 predicted: "The environment will have lost important life-supporting capabilities. By 2000, 40 percent of the forests still remaining in the LDC's in 1978 will have been razed. The atomspheric concentration of carbon dioxide will be nearly one-third higher than preindustrial levels. Soil erosion will have removed, on the average, several inches of soil from croplands allover the world. Desertification (including salinization) may have claimed a significant fraction of the world's rangeland and cropland. Over little more than two decades, 15-20 percent of the earth's total species of plants and animals will have become extinct — a loss of at least 500,000 species" concluding "thus anyone with a present life expectancy of an additional 50 years could expect to see the world population reach 10 billion. The same rate of growth would produce a population of nearly 30 billion before the end of the twenty-first century. Here it must be emphasized that, unlike most of the Global 2000 Study projections, the population projections assume extensive policy changes and developments to reduce fertility rates".
|The Georgia Guidestones destroyed after being bombed|
The Georgia Guidestones, was a monument in Georgia whose financially wealthy erector(s) wanted to remain anonymous. They proposed a limit of 500,000,000 humans on the planet. The guidestones were bombed at around 4am on 6 July 2022, completely pulverizing one of the pillars. The entire monument was demolished later the same day. CCM elected not explore the possible motives behind the bombing.
Indirect support by "science"
According to some archaeologists - fantasizing about rather exactly known ancient climate data - water supplies, plagues, climate and "civilization" might be correlated in the following ways:
“Overpopulation and the overreliance on irrigation was a major factor in making the Maya vulnerable to failure:
the trigger event of their collapse appears to have been a long drought beginning about 840 A.D. (communication of V. Scarborough, an archaelogist (sic!) from the University of Cincinnati ). Among many factors, such as war and plagues, that contributed to many of the collapses of ancient societies, there seem to be two main causes: too many people and too little fresh water. As a consequence, the civilization became vulnerable to environmental stress, for instance, a prolonged drought or a change in climate .
The societies themselves appear to have contributed to their own demise by encouraging growth of their population to levels that carried the seeds of their own decline through overexploitation of the land (communication of C. Scarre, an archaelogist (sic!) from the Cambridge University in England ). Similarly, the Akkadian empire in Mesopotamia, the Old Kingdom of Egypt, the Indus Valley civilization in India,
Debunking Malthusian claims
- Full article: Thomas Malthus
- Full article: Thomas Malthus
The population control and eugenics discussion fostered by Gates and Schwab (see: Club of Rome) centers around the theses, that population grows exponentially, where as food production grows only linearly (so called Malthusian trap). This thesis is not confirmed by biologists observing actual population dynamics in mammals. Several studies confirm, that when food supplies are getting scarce "they grow more slowly, reproduce less, and populations decline".
This general finding is in opposition to Malthus' claims. Not mortality rate is growing ("stupid, machine-like reproduction"), but rather birth rate declines when resources are scarce.
Predator prey dynamics
Humans engage in intraspecies predation.
They are the only species who make slaves and hold other humans like domestic animals. The effect of intraspecies predation on population dynamics is poorly understood. It involves investigation of the question how the threat of being preyed upon effects birth rate. A hypotheses is, that human prey makes up for the perceived threat by increasing their reproduction rate. It is known that humans living under precarious conditions have a much higher birth rate than the middle class, likely because of what's called predation pressure by biologists. Predation in the form of population control (forced sterilization and vaccination) might therefore have the effect of an arms race between prey (increased reproduction) and predators.
|COVID-19/Medical killings||During the COVID-19 deep event, a number of governments implemented policies that drastically increased death numbers|
|Immunocontraception||Immunocontraception is the use of vaccines in order to cause temporary infertility.|
|Population control||In the relevant publications of the Club of Rome population control is used as euphemism for population reduction, eugenics and corporatism|
|Sterilization campaign||Large-scale and well organized sterilization efforts for population control and reduction.|
|Suburbanization||Population growth in cities|
|"Climate change"||“we came up with the idea that ... global warming ... and the like, would fit the bill.”||Alexander King|
Club of Rome
|David Attenborough||“We now know the disasters that continue to inflict the natural world have one element that connects them all… The unprecedented increase in the number of humans beings on the planet...It needs actions by governments. In my view, all countries should develop a population policy”||David Attenborough||2011|
|David Attenborough||“For the past 20 years I've never had any doubt that the source of the Earth's ills is overpopulation. I can't go on saying this sort of thing and then fail to put my head above the parapet..”||David Attenborough||2009|
|David Attenborough||“All our environmental problems become easier to solve with fewer people and harder - and ultimately impossible to solve - with ever more people.”||David Attenborough||2018|
|David Attenborough||“I have no doubt that the fundamental source of all our problems, particularly our environmental problems, is population growth. I can’t think of a single problem that would be easier to solve if there were less people”||David Attenborough||January 2020|
|David Baltimore||“When I first saw the furin cleavage site <a href="#cite_note-1"></a> in the viral sequence, with its arginine codons, I said to my wife it was the smoking gun for the origin of the virus. (...) These features make a powerful challenge to the idea of a natural origin for SARS2.”||David Baltimore|
|Jair Bolsonaro||“If you accept this vaccination passport, soon there will be another requirement, and another one... and you know where it will stop then... Population control!"”||Jair Bolsonaro||2021|
|Anatoly Chubais||“From the 7 billion that will be reached this week, the world population should drop to two and a half or even one and a half billion people by the end of the century. A three-fold reduction in the population would be simply unthinkable, although serious scientists are talking about exactly this.”||Anatoly Chubais||2011|
|Climate change/Preparation||“Similarly, the Akkadian empire in Mesopotamia, the Old Kingdom of Egypt, the Indus Valley civilization in India, and early societies in Palestine, Greece, and Crete all collapsed in a catastrophic drought and cooling of the atmosphere between 2300 and 2200 B.C.”||Didier Sornette||2003|
|Club of Rome||“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”||Alexander King|
Club of Rome
|Paul Ehrlich||“The optimum population of Earth – enough to guarantee the minimal physical ingredients of a decent life to everyone – was 1.5 to 2 billion people rather than the 7 billion who are alive today or the 9 billion expected in 2050...How many you support depends on lifestyles. We came up with 1.5 to 2 billion because you can have big active cities and wilderness. If you want a battery chicken world where everyone has minimum space and food and everyone is kept just about alive you might be able to support in the long term about 4 or 5 billion people. But you already have 7 billion. So we have to humanely and as rapidly as possible move to population shrinkage.
Some maybe slow motion disasters like people getting more and more hungry, or catastrophic disasters because the more people you have the greater the chance of some weird virus transferring from animal to human populations, there could be a vast die-off." [...]It's hard to think of anything that will pop up and save us. I hope something will but it really will be a miracle."”
|Bill Gates||“In terms of intellectual property, what we do is actually very simple: we fund research, and we ourselves or our partners create intellectual property, so that everything that is invented with the help of foundation money and goes to richer countries actually pays off.”||Bill Gates||16 May 2011|
|Bill Gates||“First, we've got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.”||Bill Gates|
Innovating to zero TED talk
|18 February 2010|
|Jane Goodall||“It’s our population growth that underlies just about every single one of the problems that we’ve inflicted on the planet. If there were just a few of us, then the nasty things we do wouldn’t really matter and Mother Nature would take care of it — but there are so many of us.”||Jane Goodall||November 2007|
|Jane Goodall||“All these [environmental] things we talk about wouldn’t be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.”||Jane Goodall||January 2020|
|António Guterres||“I urge world leaders to fully support the Global Vaccination Strategy I launched with the World Health Organization (WHO) last month. We need to get vaccines into the arms of 40 per cent of people in all countries by the end of this year — and 70 per cent by mid-2022.”||António Guterres||1 December 2021|
|Barbara Marx Hubbard||“One-fourth of humanity must be eliminated from the social body. We are in charge of God's selection process for planet Earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death.”||Barbara Marx Hubbard|
|Barbara Marx Hubbard||“This act is as horrible as killing a cancer cell. It must be done for the sake of the future of the whole. So be it: be prepared for the selection process which is now beginning. We, the elders, have been patiently waiting until the very last moment before the quantum transformation, to take action to cut out this corrupted and corrupting element in the body of humanity. It is like watching a cancer grow; something must be done before the whole body is destroyed… The destructive one fourth must be eliminated from the social body.””||Barbara Marx Hubbard|
|Boris Johnson||“Global over-population is the real issue [...] The UN last year revised its forecasts upwards, predicting that there will be 9.2 billion people by 2050, and I simply cannot understand why no one discusses this impending calamity, and why no world statesmen have the guts to treat the issue with the seriousness it deserves.”||Boris Johnson||25 October 2007|
|Boris Johnson||“How the hell can we witter on about tackling global warming, and reducing consumption, when we are continuing to add so relentlessly to the number of consumers? The answer is politics, and political cowardice.”||Boris Johnson||25 October 2007|
|Stanley Johnson||“Interviewer: Do you have a sense of what the carrying capacity of Britain is, or of the world as a whole?|
Stanley Johnson: Britain I put it at 10 or 15 million, I think that would be absolutely fine, I mean that would do us really splendidly, at a limit 20 - 25.”
|Philip Mountbatten||“Human population growth is probably the single most serious long-term threat to survival. We’re in for a major disaster if it isn’t curbed—not just for the natural world, but for the human world. The more people there are, the more resources they’ll consume, the more pollution they’ll create, the more fighting they’ll do. We have no option. If it isn’t controlled voluntarily, it will be controlled involuntarily by an increase in disease, starvation and war.|
Can you give me an example?
I was in Sri Lanka recently, where a United Nations project set out in the late 1940s to eradicate malaria. It’s an island and it was therefore possible to destroy the mosquito carrying the disease. What people didn’t realize was that malaria was actually controlling the growth of the population. The consequence was that within about 20 years the population doubled. Now they’ve got to find something for all those people to do and some way to feed them.”
|Philip Mountbatten||21 December 1981|
|Philip Mountbatten||“I just wonder what it would be like to be reincarnated in an animal whose species had been so reduced in numbers than it was in danger of extinction. What would be its feelings toward the human species whose population explosion had denied it somewhere to exist… I must confess that I am tempted to ask for reincarnation as a particularly deadly virus.”||Philip Mountbatten||1987|
|William Mountbatten-Windsor||“We are going to have to work much harder and think much deeper, if we are to ensure that human beings and the other species of animal with which we share this planet can continue to co-exist...Africa's rapidly growing human population is predicted to more than double by 2050, a staggering increase of three and a half million people per month...There is no question that this increase puts wildlife and habitat under enormous pressure. Urbanisation, infrastructure development, cultivation—all good things in themselves, but they will have a terrible impact unless we begin to plan and to take measures now.”||William Mountbatten-Windsor||2017|
|Pieter Omtzigt||“The French have been utilizing population policies for centuries. And they still think that they lost the Franco-Prussian War because they didn't have enough soldiers to send to the front lines. And that's why I don't want to implement any form of populace policy.”||Pieter Omtzigt||27 November 2004|
|Michael Oppenheimer||“The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can’t let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialisation we have in the U.S. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are.”||Michael Oppenheimer|
|Aurelio Peccei||“Otherwise, some solution will come the hard way. Many hypotheses have been advanced. I will cite three ghastly solutions that are ventilated as belonging to the realm of the possible. One is biological: nature, which maintains so many balances, will see to it that human incontinence will be remedied, through some new germ or virus. Another is constrictive and prophylactic: the day may not be far off when—by grafting of population from one region to another, forced exodus, or mass sterilization, or with the help of other clean methods biochemistry might suggest — a ceiling on population or new births will be enforced, in some nations by due process of law, in others perhaps by international measures. And the third, the harshest, is hinted at in a most pessimistic essay by Professor J. D. Bernal (Enormity or Logic and Hypocrisy in the Ultimate Solution, October 1967) — "there is no limit to human folly and callousness" —in the sense that all will end, as the only compassionate and rational solution left, with the elimination of all surplus humans, who will of course belong to the poor of the world. No comment is necessary.”||Aurelio Peccei||1969|
|Population Matters||“The human population can no longer be allowed to grow in the same old uncontrolled way. If we do not take charge of our population size, then nature will do it for us and it is the poor people of the world who will suffer most.”||David Attenborough|
|Population Matters||“The idea that every woman should have as many babies as she wants is to me exactly the same kind of idea as, everybody ought to be permitted to throw as much of their garbage into their neighbor’s backyard as they want.”||Paul Ehrlich||2 November 2015|
|Jon Rappoport||“Long term, the medical cartel is the most dangerous cartel in the world, because they fly under a politically neutral banner. They claim they are completely non-partisan, we are here to help, to heal, and that's it. Who could doubt that? This is the greatest cover operation anyone could conceive of, using medical science, the medical system, with its toxic drugs, its toxic vaccines, to destroy whole populations from within. And occasionally come out with some massive epidemic program to further suppress and destroy populations.”||Jon Rappoport||29 September 2022|
|Athanasius Schneider||“[...] and we dont know, maybe history will show us, what is still behind this vaccine campaign, world campaign. What is behind the, the principle reason, or aim, maybe we will know this after some time. Some people say, with some proofs, that it could be, it is probable, that one of the main aims behind this global vaccine campaign is to reduce the world population. A kind of population control. I would not exclude this. [...]”||Athanasius Schneider||November 2021|
|Sierra Club||“Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license... All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”||David Browser|
|Transhumanism||“unless [civilised societies] invent and enforce adequate measures for regulating human reproduction, for controlling the quantity of population, and at least preventing the deterioration of quality of racial stock, they are doomed to decay”||Julian Huxley||1926|
|WEF/Annual Meeting/2020||“All these [environmental] things we talk about wouldn’t be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.”||Jane Goodall|
|Michael Yeadon||“It’s become absolutely clear to me, even when I talk to intelligent people, friends, acquaintances … and they can tell I’m telling them something important, but they get to the point [where I say] ‘your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death and that of your children,’ and they can’t begin to engage with it. And I think maybe 10% of them understand what I said, and 90% of those blank their understanding of it because it is too difficult. And my concern is, we are going to lose this, because people will not deal with the possibility that anyone is so evil…”||Michael Yeadon||April 2021|
|Michael Yeadon||“If you wanted to depopulate a significant portion of the world, and to do it in a way that wouldn’t require destruction of the environment with nuclear weapons, or poisoning everyone with anthrax or something, and you wanted plausible deniability, whilst you had a multi-year infectious disease crisis; I don’t think you could come up with a better plan than what seems to be in front of me. I can’t say that’s what they’re going to do, but I cannot think of a benign explanation for why they are doing it.”||Michael Yeadon||April 2021|
|Document:M23 and the unseen high-tech genocide||report||8 November 2013||Keith Harmon-Snow||Exposé of the criminal deceptions of Western NGOs and their sponsored African elites in the exploitation of African mineral resources|
|Document:Why The Population Bomb Is a Rockefeller Baby||article||1970||Steve Weissman||In the decades previous, birth control had been largely small potatoes. Once the Rockefellers joined the family, however, family planning became a very different kind of business.|
- http://thesaker.is/population-control-via-extermination-reduction-and-machination-case-examples-of-us-armed-personnel-and-iranian-people/ saved at Archive.org saved at Archive.is (emphasis added)
- https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pcaab500.pdf saved at Archive.org
- cited as Sornette's personal communication at a conference on “The Collapse of Complex Societies,” San Francisco, Feb. 2001. (emphasis added) in: Why stock markets crash (2003) Princeton University Press, page 385. Downloaded from z-lib.org
- https://neeness.com/how-does-the-population-of-prey-animal-mice-affect-the-predator-owl-population/ (better)
- Meloy, J. Reid, Ph.D.,The psychopathic mind: origins, dynamics, and treatment, Jason Aronson 2002