Difference between revisions of "User talk:Sean Preston"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(A short analysis on proxy warfare__)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
<big>Thank you</big>
 
<big>Thank you</big>
  
== A short anaylisis on proxy warfare__ ==
+
== A short analysis on proxy warfare__ ==
  
 
<big>Introduction</big>
 
<big>Introduction</big>

Revision as of 14:38, 18 May 2016

Welcome to Wikispooks!

We're glad you came. There's lots to do.
The Community portal is probably the best place to start for new users. To add a Wikispooks search facility to your browser, go here. If you've got a topic you're itching to write about, just dive in. If you're not sure where to start, you can introduce yourself by editing either this page or your user page. Robin (talk) 01:54, 17 May 2016 (IST)

Thank you

A short analysis on proxy warfare__

Introduction

The US engages in subterfuge of epic proportions. What does the US hope to gain by this? The answer to that is asserting the idea of US hegemony. That is, to ascertain dominance as world superpower. See page The US hierarchy will name you as a threat to national security if you are not working within Washington's best interests. These interests may include the introduction of a planned economy, interference of any sort, or perhaps working against (foreign-US) corporate interests. The US hierarchy then these absurd claims of national security threat to justify an intervention of sorts. Hence, why political ideologies like neoconservatism and vice versa are so dangerous.

Proxy warfare

Proxy warfare is debatably one of the most common ways the US obtains hegemony. Proxy war Simply put, we are indirectly influencing the conflict. Proxy warfare may occur in a number of ways. For instance, a senate banking subcommittee investigated an incident involving large Wall Street banks using corporate stock to drive oil prices in Russia from a $130 dollars per barrel to $30 dollars per barrel. This was directed at the Russian market economy with the knowledge that Russia's economic model is centered around oil. MintPress News was quoted as saying "When one considers how much influence these large banks have on global prices, it’s almost self-evident that they would be able to use oil prices to execute a political and geopolitical agenda. With that in mind, it seems highly suspicious (to say the least) that the collapse of the oil price coincided directly with Russia’s move to annex Crimea and assert its dominance over its sphere of influence, thereby effectively stopping the eastward expansion of NATO in Ukraine." See page Proxy warfare may also occur in the form of US-sponsored programs such as the International Monetary Fund. By using indirect rule through the IMF the hierarchy is able to undermine the sovereignty of nations for the common good. In addition, non governmental organisations are also state-sponsored. NGOs are a collection of US funded organizations working to destabilize a country while in the guise of humanitarianism. These NGOs when the time is right indoctrinate the populace with ideas of revolution and dissent. This occurred in British occupied India through means of the school system. NGOs call for the privatization of public assets and political reform therefore destabilizing the country and shifting sentiments toward western hegemony.

Conclusion

The US is quite fond of proxy warfare. Being that the hierarchy are imperialists. Who will use pseudo-geopolitics to undermine the sovereignty of nations to ascertain our dominance, our supremacy, as world superpower.

Refrences

Global research article

Proxy war definition

MintPress article