Difference between revisions of "User talk:Sean Preston"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(I deleted post)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<big>Introduction</big>
 
<big>Introduction</big>
  
The US engages in subterfuge of epic proportions. What does the US hope to gain by this? The answer to that is asserting the idea of US hegemony. That is, to ascertain dominance as world superpower. See [http://www.globalresearch.ca/somnolent-europe-russia-and-china-accept-us-hegemony-or-go-to-war/5523732 page] The US hierarchy will name you as a threat to national security if you are not working within Washington's best interests. These interests may include the introduction of a planned economy, interference of any sort, or perhaps working against (foreign-US) corporate interests. The US hierarchy then these absurd claims of national security threat to justify an intervention of sorts. Hence, why political ideologies like neoconservatism and vice versa are so dangerous.  
+
Behind the scenes, the US engages in covert warfare. What does the US hope to gain by this? The answer to that is asserting the idea of US hegemony. That is, to ascertain dominance as world superpower. See [http://www.globalresearch.ca/somnolent-europe-russia-and-china-accept-us-hegemony-or-go-to-war/5523732 page] The US hierarchy will name you as a threat to national security if you are not working within Washington's best interests. These interests may include the introduction of a planned economy, interference of any sort, or perhaps working against (foreign-US) corporate interests. The US hierarchy then these absurd claims of national security threat to justify an intervention of sorts. Hence, why political ideologies like neoconservatism and vice versa are so dangerous.  
  
 
<big>Proxy warfare</big>
 
<big>Proxy warfare</big>
Line 11: Line 11:
 
<big>Conclusion</big>
 
<big>Conclusion</big>
  
The US is quite fond of proxy warfare. Being that the hierarchy are imperialists. Who will use pseudo-geopolitics to undermine the sovereignty of nations to ascertain our dominance, our supremacy, as world superpower.
+
The US is quite fond of proxy warfare. Being that the hierarchy are imperialists...we will continue to use pseudo-geopolitics to undermine the sovereignty of nations to ascertain our dominance, our supremacy, as world superpower.
  
 
<big>Refrences</big>
 
<big>Refrences</big>
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
MintPress [http://www.mintpressnews.com/brics-attack-western-banks-governments-launch-full-spectrum-assault-russia-part/215761/ article]
 
MintPress [http://www.mintpressnews.com/brics-attack-western-banks-governments-launch-full-spectrum-assault-russia-part/215761/ article]
 +
 +
== Organising of contributions ==
 +
 +
Hello there, Sean. As you will notice, this page has special properties as regard communication - it is where people can easily get your attention if they write something. To reply to this, it is common to add a response just below it. To start a new discussion with someone, use their User_talk: page. It's unusual to write other stuff here than conversation.
 +
 +
I thought I'd take the time to give you a few handy pointers about WS style. For more details, see the [[Wikispooks:Style_Guide]].
 +
# ''References'' : These are ''highly encouraged'' as a way of adding credibility to your writing<ref>[[Wikispooks:Style_Guide]]</ref>, and the <nowiki><ref>.... </ref></nowiki> syntax is the best fashion to do this (usually tidier than inline hyperlinks).
 +
# ''Headings'' : Two or more "=" characters create different level headings, and this is the recommended way to split material into different sections - not 'big' tags as you used in [[Globalization of tyranny]]
 +
# ''Page titles'' : This is the most important difference from ordinary blogging/writing. Wikispooks has an encyclopaedic style, so page titles are much simpler and more generic than titles of ordinary articles or essays. The page you created "[[Globalization of tyranny]]" talks about the [[IMF]], about which you will see we already have a stub class article. Some of that material could be incorporated into the existing IMF article.
 +
 +
I've just created an empty page at [[Proxy war]], which you may wish to copy as kind of template of future pages and/or populate with material exported from this page. Do let me know if you have questions or if I can help in any way. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 08:16, 20 May 2016 (IST)

Latest revision as of 07:16, 20 May 2016

A short analysis on proxy warfare__

Introduction

Behind the scenes, the US engages in covert warfare. What does the US hope to gain by this? The answer to that is asserting the idea of US hegemony. That is, to ascertain dominance as world superpower. See page The US hierarchy will name you as a threat to national security if you are not working within Washington's best interests. These interests may include the introduction of a planned economy, interference of any sort, or perhaps working against (foreign-US) corporate interests. The US hierarchy then these absurd claims of national security threat to justify an intervention of sorts. Hence, why political ideologies like neoconservatism and vice versa are so dangerous.

Proxy warfare

Proxy warfare is debatably one of the most common ways the US obtains hegemony. Proxy war Simply put, we are indirectly influencing the conflict. Proxy warfare may occur in a number of ways. For instance, a senate banking subcommittee investigated an incident involving large Wall Street banks using corporate stock to drive oil prices in Russia from a $130 dollars per barrel to $30 dollars per barrel. This was directed at the Russian market economy with the knowledge that Russia's economic model is centered around oil. MintPress News was quoted as saying "When one considers how much influence these large banks have on global prices, it’s almost self-evident that they would be able to use oil prices to execute a political and geopolitical agenda. With that in mind, it seems highly suspicious (to say the least) that the collapse of the oil price coincided directly with Russia’s move to annex Crimea and assert its dominance over its sphere of influence, thereby effectively stopping the eastward expansion of NATO in Ukraine." See page Proxy warfare may also occur in the form of US-sponsored programs such as the International Monetary Fund. By using indirect rule through the IMF the hierarchy is able to undermine the sovereignty of nations for the common good. In addition, non governmental organisations are also state-sponsored. NGOs are a collection of US funded organizations working to destabilize a country while in the guise of humanitarianism. These NGOs when the time is right indoctrinate the populace with ideas of revolution and dissent. This occurred in British occupied India through means of the school system. NGOs call for the privatization of public assets and political reform therefore destabilizing the country and shifting sentiments toward western hegemony.

Conclusion

The US is quite fond of proxy warfare. Being that the hierarchy are imperialists...we will continue to use pseudo-geopolitics to undermine the sovereignty of nations to ascertain our dominance, our supremacy, as world superpower.

Refrences

Global research article

Proxy war definition

MintPress article

Organising of contributions

Hello there, Sean. As you will notice, this page has special properties as regard communication - it is where people can easily get your attention if they write something. To reply to this, it is common to add a response just below it. To start a new discussion with someone, use their User_talk: page. It's unusual to write other stuff here than conversation.

I thought I'd take the time to give you a few handy pointers about WS style. For more details, see the Wikispooks:Style_Guide.

  1. References : These are highly encouraged as a way of adding credibility to your writing[1], and the <ref>.... </ref> syntax is the best fashion to do this (usually tidier than inline hyperlinks).
  2. Headings : Two or more "=" characters create different level headings, and this is the recommended way to split material into different sections - not 'big' tags as you used in Globalization of tyranny
  3. Page titles : This is the most important difference from ordinary blogging/writing. Wikispooks has an encyclopaedic style, so page titles are much simpler and more generic than titles of ordinary articles or essays. The page you created "Globalization of tyranny" talks about the IMF, about which you will see we already have a stub class article. Some of that material could be incorporated into the existing IMF article.

I've just created an empty page at Proxy war, which you may wish to copy as kind of template of future pages and/or populate with material exported from this page. Do let me know if you have questions or if I can help in any way. -- Robin (talk) 08:16, 20 May 2016 (IST)