Difference between revisions of "Israeli Segregated buses"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "'''Autobus mehadrin''' (literal translation "beautified bus") is the name for segregated buses in Israel. These routes meet Haredi standards of modesty with men sitting at the fr...")
 
(More references)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Autobus mehadrin''' (literal translation "beautified bus") is the name for segregated buses in Israel. These routes meet Haredi standards of modesty with men sitting at the front and women at the back. Hasidic men sit right at the front with non-Hasidic men behind, This configuration means that the men’s distance from the women’s section in direct proportion to their community’s zeal for segregated buses.<ref name="ForwardISSB">[http://www.forward.com/articles/128820/ Israel's Sex-Segregated Buses Riding High] Jewish Daily Forward, June 2006.</ref>
+
'''Autobus mehadrin''' (literal translation "beautified bus") is the name for segregated buses in Israel. These routes meet Haredi standards of modesty with men sitting at the front and women at the back.  
  
Secular passengers travel on the 60 or so routes but are expected to comply with the same standards, controversy surrounds the coercion and even violence sometimes applied to women who are non-compliant.<ref name="ForwardISSB" />
+
Secular passengers travel on the 60 or so routes and may be expected to voluntarily comply with the same standards after the 2011 High Court of Justice ruling.
 +
==Origins==
 +
The practice began with private bus-companies who catered for the haredi community, a demographic that owns fewer cars but has large familes.<ref name="ForwardISSB">[http://www.forward.com/articles/128820/ Israel's Sex-Segregated Buses Riding High] “Hey, lady!” yelled the bus driver. “You forgot your Psalms booklet.” Jewish Daily Forward, June 2006.</ref> These services were challenged in the 1990s by the Egged and Dan bus companies, who began to run gender-separated buses themselves. In the decade from 1997 to 2007 the number of such bus routes proliferated and spread from urban to intercity routes and by June 2006 there were about 60 of these routes. Controversy surrounds the coercion and even violence sometimes applied to women who refuse.<ref>[http://www.haaretz.com/woman-beaten-on-j-lem-bus-for-refusing-to-move-to-rear-seat-1.207251 Woman beaten on J'lem bus for refusing to move to rear seat] Ha'aretz. 15th Dec 2006.</ref>
  
Segregation on some buses is assisted by the presence of entrances at front and back, while others have a single entrance at the front.<ref name="ForwardISSB" />
+
Hasidic men sit right at the front with non-Hasidic men behind, This configuration means that the men’s distance from the women’s section in direct proportion to their community’s zeal for segregated buses. Segregation on some buses is assisted by the presence of entrances at front and back, while others have a single entrance at the front.
==Origins==
 
The practice began with private bus-companies who catered for the haredi community. These services were challenged in the 1990s by the Egged and Dan bus companies, who began to run gender-separated buses themselves. In the decade from 1997 to 2007 the number of such bus routes proliferated and spread from urban to intercity routes<ref name="JpostCourtScraps" /> and by June 2006 there were about 60 of these routes.<ref name="ForwardISSB" />
 
 
==2011 Court Case==
 
==2011 Court Case==
In 2007 a petition was filed against the gender-segregated buses at the High Court, in which five women, including New York-born novelist Naomi Ragen, questioned their legitimacy.<ref name="ForwardISSB" /> The women charged that there were no formal arrangements or conditions for the operation of these special bus lines and that, as passengers on these buses, they had been harassed by haredim for insisting on sitting in the front section.<ref name="JpostCourtScraps">[http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?ID=202456&R=R1 Court scraps ‘mehadrin’ buses] Israel Religious Action Center praises ruling but says "court left back door open." Jerusalem Post, 6th Jan 2011.</ref>  
+
In 2007 a petition was filed against the gender-segregated buses at the High Court, in which five women, including New York-born novelist Naomi Ragen, questioned their legitimacy. The women charged that there were no formal arrangements or conditions for the operation of these special bus lines and that, as passengers on these buses, they had been harassed by haredim for insisting on sitting in the front section.<ref name="JpostCourtScraps">[http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?ID=202456&R=R1 Court scraps ‘mehadrin’ buses] Israel Religious Action Center praises ruling but says "court left back door open." Jerusalem Post, 6th Jan 2011.</ref>  
  
 
On the judge’s instruction, the Transportation Ministry convened the Langer Committee to formulate a policy regarding gender-separation on buses. The committee reported on the 26th October 2009 and recommended outlawing it, saying "the arrangement grew and spread without direction, supervision, assessment or significant intervention by the Transportation Ministry and created a sense among haredi groups that it was the obligation of the ministry to provide bus lines suited to their way of life. This, in turn, let to attempts to impose the seating arrangement on those who did not adhere to it.". Then Transportation Minister Yisrael Katz said they should continue.<ref name="ForwardISSB" />
 
On the judge’s instruction, the Transportation Ministry convened the Langer Committee to formulate a policy regarding gender-separation on buses. The committee reported on the 26th October 2009 and recommended outlawing it, saying "the arrangement grew and spread without direction, supervision, assessment or significant intervention by the Transportation Ministry and created a sense among haredi groups that it was the obligation of the ministry to provide bus lines suited to their way of life. This, in turn, let to attempts to impose the seating arrangement on those who did not adhere to it.". Then Transportation Minister Yisrael Katz said they should continue.<ref name="ForwardISSB" />
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
The Israel Religious Action Center (IRAC) attorney Einat Horowitz praised the ruling but said that the "verdict anchors what is obvious. Every woman is free to choose her seat on a public bus and is entitled to egalitarian treatment that respects her choice.” Another IRAC director Anat Hoffman, however, noted that the court had “left the back door open” because women would still be expected to enter by the back door of the bus. “Women who have been bullied into sitting in the back of the bus, have been trained to sit there. I want that door closed. If men and women enter by the front door, chances are the women will take the first available seat at their own convenience.” Hoffman added that in the first trial year there would be 1,000 "freedom riders" checking on whether women could really sit where they wanted to. Meretz MK Nitzan Horowitz welcomed the decision, "Israel is not, and shall not be, Iran.”<ref name="JpostCourtScraps" />
 
The Israel Religious Action Center (IRAC) attorney Einat Horowitz praised the ruling but said that the "verdict anchors what is obvious. Every woman is free to choose her seat on a public bus and is entitled to egalitarian treatment that respects her choice.” Another IRAC director Anat Hoffman, however, noted that the court had “left the back door open” because women would still be expected to enter by the back door of the bus. “Women who have been bullied into sitting in the back of the bus, have been trained to sit there. I want that door closed. If men and women enter by the front door, chances are the women will take the first available seat at their own convenience.” Hoffman added that in the first trial year there would be 1,000 "freedom riders" checking on whether women could really sit where they wanted to. Meretz MK Nitzan Horowitz welcomed the decision, "Israel is not, and shall not be, Iran.”<ref name="JpostCourtScraps" />
 +
 +
The ruling still permits the separation of men and women on buses serving some ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities, but only if the passengers agree.<ref>[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jan/6/israeli-court-approves-gender-segregated-buses/ Israeli court approves gender-segregated buses] ruling permitting separation but only if the passengers agree. Washington Times, 6th Jan 2011.</ref>
 
==Geographical coverage==
 
==Geographical coverage==
 
The busy Route 322 runs from TelAviv to Jerusalem via Ashdod is operated by Veoila Transportation (formerly Connex), a French-based multinational which manages to undersell its secular counterpart, Egged, Israel's largest bus company.<ref name="ForwardISSB" />  
 
The busy Route 322 runs from TelAviv to Jerusalem via Ashdod is operated by Veoila Transportation (formerly Connex), a French-based multinational which manages to undersell its secular counterpart, Egged, Israel's largest bus company.<ref name="ForwardISSB" />  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Revision as of 14:41, 29 January 2011

Autobus mehadrin (literal translation "beautified bus") is the name for segregated buses in Israel. These routes meet Haredi standards of modesty with men sitting at the front and women at the back.

Secular passengers travel on the 60 or so routes and may be expected to voluntarily comply with the same standards after the 2011 High Court of Justice ruling.

Origins

The practice began with private bus-companies who catered for the haredi community, a demographic that owns fewer cars but has large familes.[1] These services were challenged in the 1990s by the Egged and Dan bus companies, who began to run gender-separated buses themselves. In the decade from 1997 to 2007 the number of such bus routes proliferated and spread from urban to intercity routes and by June 2006 there were about 60 of these routes. Controversy surrounds the coercion and even violence sometimes applied to women who refuse.[2]

Hasidic men sit right at the front with non-Hasidic men behind, This configuration means that the men’s distance from the women’s section in direct proportion to their community’s zeal for segregated buses. Segregation on some buses is assisted by the presence of entrances at front and back, while others have a single entrance at the front.

2011 Court Case

In 2007 a petition was filed against the gender-segregated buses at the High Court, in which five women, including New York-born novelist Naomi Ragen, questioned their legitimacy. The women charged that there were no formal arrangements or conditions for the operation of these special bus lines and that, as passengers on these buses, they had been harassed by haredim for insisting on sitting in the front section.[3]

On the judge’s instruction, the Transportation Ministry convened the Langer Committee to formulate a policy regarding gender-separation on buses. The committee reported on the 26th October 2009 and recommended outlawing it, saying "the arrangement grew and spread without direction, supervision, assessment or significant intervention by the Transportation Ministry and created a sense among haredi groups that it was the obligation of the ministry to provide bus lines suited to their way of life. This, in turn, let to attempts to impose the seating arrangement on those who did not adhere to it.". Then Transportation Minister Yisrael Katz said they should continue.[1]

On 6th Jan 2011 the High Court of Justice officially abolished the so-called "mehadrin" public buses operated by the Egged bus company. According to Justice Elyakim Rubinstein, "There is a common understanding today that the operation of the buses as they were run until 2007 is forbidden. This is the current opinion of the Transportation Minister and, as the regulatory body, that is what he will instruct the public bus companies. For those who are not clear on this, we will say that a public transportation operator (like anyone else) may not tell, request or order women to sit in a specific place on the bus just because they are women, or to tell them how to dress, and they are entitled to sit anywhere they wish."[3]

The Israel Religious Action Center (IRAC) attorney Einat Horowitz praised the ruling but said that the "verdict anchors what is obvious. Every woman is free to choose her seat on a public bus and is entitled to egalitarian treatment that respects her choice.” Another IRAC director Anat Hoffman, however, noted that the court had “left the back door open” because women would still be expected to enter by the back door of the bus. “Women who have been bullied into sitting in the back of the bus, have been trained to sit there. I want that door closed. If men and women enter by the front door, chances are the women will take the first available seat at their own convenience.” Hoffman added that in the first trial year there would be 1,000 "freedom riders" checking on whether women could really sit where they wanted to. Meretz MK Nitzan Horowitz welcomed the decision, "Israel is not, and shall not be, Iran.”[3]

The ruling still permits the separation of men and women on buses serving some ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities, but only if the passengers agree.[4]

Geographical coverage

The busy Route 322 runs from TelAviv to Jerusalem via Ashdod is operated by Veoila Transportation (formerly Connex), a French-based multinational which manages to undersell its secular counterpart, Egged, Israel's largest bus company.[1]

References

  1. a b c Israel's Sex-Segregated Buses Riding High “Hey, lady!” yelled the bus driver. “You forgot your Psalms booklet.” Jewish Daily Forward, June 2006.
  2. Woman beaten on J'lem bus for refusing to move to rear seat Ha'aretz. 15th Dec 2006.
  3. a b c Court scraps ‘mehadrin’ buses Israel Religious Action Center praises ruling but says "court left back door open." Jerusalem Post, 6th Jan 2011.
  4. Israeli court approves gender-segregated buses ruling permitting separation but only if the passengers agree. Washington Times, 6th Jan 2011.