Difference between revisions of "9-11/Israel did it/Israeli art scam"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 18: Line 18:
 
The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_student_scam current Wikipedia article] on the art scam was completely re-written to almost entirely remove the spying allegation and to heavily downplay the fact that all the scam-artists claimed to be Israeli<ref name="Canada" /><ref name="Australia" /><ref name="Seattle" /><ref name="NewZealand" /><ref name="Australia2" /> and indeed (at least in the US in 2001), all of them were Israeli.  
 
The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_student_scam current Wikipedia article] on the art scam was completely re-written to almost entirely remove the spying allegation and to heavily downplay the fact that all the scam-artists claimed to be Israeli<ref name="Canada" /><ref name="Australia" /><ref name="Seattle" /><ref name="NewZealand" /><ref name="Australia2" /> and indeed (at least in the US in 2001), all of them were Israeli.  
 
====Startling news one month later====
 
====Startling news one month later====
The unsanitised Wikispooks article you see here was created on 17th July 2010 (see History on the tab at the top of the page), this was done in order to preserve a record of the original contents. Much of Wikipedia is maintained on its servers as a permanent visible record, but the contents of deleted articles cannot be seen. Hence the importance of saving what may be deleted.
+
The unsanitised Wikispooks article you see here was created on 17th July 2010 in order to preserve a record of the original contents. Much of Wikipedia is maintained on its servers as a permanent visible record, but the contents of deleted articles cannot be seen. Hence the importance of saving what may be deleted.
  
Just 6 hours after this act of preservation, the tide suddenly turned, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Art_student_scam&diff=374010111&oldid=373366509 this edit]. Weasel words and statements such as "''An internal DEA report, leaked in 2002 in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, gave rise to an urban myth that shaped much of the reporting about the scam''<ref name="Haaretz">[http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=162902&contrassID=2&subContrassID=5&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y&itemNo=162902 Spies, or students?] Were the Israelis just trying to sell their paintings, or agents in a massive espionage ring? Haaretz May 7, 2002.</ref><ref name=Seattle1>[http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20020307&slug=notspies07 U.S. officials dismiss report of Israeli spies] Seattle Times March 7, 2002.</ref><ref name="Forward">[http://www.forward.com/articles/5250/ Espionage Ruled Out in Case of Bad Art] "Israeli embassy in Ottawa has emphatically denied any link to the students and is dismissing allegations of possible espionage" The Forward September 03, 2004.</ref> were replaced by the much more honest and balanced "''In one instance, an American official described allegations of spying as "urban myth".<ref name=Seattle1></ref>
+
Just 6 hours after this act of conservation at Wikispooks, the tide suddenly turned, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Art_student_scam&diff=374010111&oldid=373366509 this edit]. Weasel words and statements such as "''An internal DEA report, leaked in 2002 in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, gave rise to an urban myth that shaped much of the reporting about the scam''<ref name="Haaretz">[http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=162902&contrassID=2&subContrassID=5&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y&itemNo=162902 Spies, or students?] Were the Israelis just trying to sell their paintings, or agents in a massive espionage ring? Haaretz May 7, 2002.</ref><ref name=Seattle1>[http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20020307&slug=notspies07 U.S. officials dismiss report of Israeli spies] Seattle Times March 7, 2002.</ref><ref name="Forward">[http://www.forward.com/articles/5250/ Espionage Ruled Out in Case of Bad Art] "Israeli embassy in Ottawa has emphatically denied any link to the students and is dismissing allegations of possible espionage" The Forward September 03, 2004.</ref> were replaced by the much more honest and balanced "''In one instance, an American official described allegations of spying as "urban myth".<ref name=Seattle1></ref>
  
In the following month and 152 revisions (ie 5 per day) the article ballooned from the 7,853 bytes of the sanitised version to the current [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Art_student_scam&oldid=379546730 20,557 bytes] perhaps as attention became focused on the importance of the topic. While the text of the article has grown nearly 3 times, use of the word "Israel" has grown more than 6 times (up from 5 times to 32 times). Less significantly perhaps, use of the word "Israel" doubled amongst the references, from 6 to 12.
+
In the following month and 152 revisions (ie 5 per day) the article ballooned from the 7,853 bytes of the sanitised version to the current [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Art_student_scam&oldid=379546730 20,557 bytes] perhaps as attention became focused on the importance of the topic. While the text of the article has grown nearly 3 times, use of the word "Israel" has grown more than 6 times (up from 5 times to 32 times).  
 +
 
 +
The Wikipedia Zionists are notorious for taking out good references and putting in very poor ones, so it is always worth checking, separately, the bias shown by the choice of references. In this case there is little to see, use of the word "Israel" has "only" doubled from 6 to 12.
  
 
==Lead of the article, summary of contents==
 
==Lead of the article, summary of contents==

Revision as of 12:14, 3 January 2011

Introduction

For a full understanding of the information presented here the following additional Wikispooks pages should be read:

Wikispooks comment

History of this article

An article on this topic entitled "Israeli art students" was created at Wikipedia in 2006 and deleted according to this discussion. No accessible record of the contents of the first article has survived.

A new and likely independent attempt to document the affair was started on 3rd March 2010 and brought up to a reasonable basic standard (size c. 11,000 characters) in a single day by a single good-faith editor. This is the version seen here - naturally it has not reached the usual standard of Wikipedia articles since there has been no cooperative input. However, it is already probably better than most starting articles and better than some "stable" or semi-permanent articles.

The following day (4th March) the new article was effectively vandalised by a different, hugely experienced editor who added "The Great Arab Refugee Scam", an ancient and entirely discredited Zionist myth, along with a new myth "Palestinian population scam on US taxpayers" increasingly popular at Wikipedia. No action was taken by administrators against this very experienced (over 25,000 edits) editor who vandalised the article, despite the well-recognised and immensely disruptive effect of irrelevant edits to an article still in development.

On the same day (ie less than 24 hours from creation), the article was nominated for deletion, another common and highly disruptive way of preventing an article ever being developed to a respectable standard. As so often before, the creator was forced to stop development while defending his creation. However, on this occasion, another editor arrived and made very major modifications, high-lighting the scam nature of the affair with particular reference to the 2008 Beijing Olympics and down-playing the very considerable spying scare that had been triggered back in 2001 (200 Israeli "students" were arrested, 140 before and 60 after 911, and some commmentators thought the proportion of military communication specialists amongst them was unusually high).

As a result of the re-write, the Wikipedia deletion (known in the jargon as an AfD, 'Article for deletion') failed. The price for this survival was to have the article changed to minimise and white-wash the affair almost to invisibility.

Wikipedia white-wash

The current Wikipedia article on the art scam was completely re-written to almost entirely remove the spying allegation and to heavily downplay the fact that all the scam-artists claimed to be Israeli[1][2][3][4][5] and indeed (at least in the US in 2001), all of them were Israeli.

Startling news one month later

The unsanitised Wikispooks article you see here was created on 17th July 2010 in order to preserve a record of the original contents. Much of Wikipedia is maintained on its servers as a permanent visible record, but the contents of deleted articles cannot be seen. Hence the importance of saving what may be deleted.

Just 6 hours after this act of conservation at Wikispooks, the tide suddenly turned, see this edit. Weasel words and statements such as "An internal DEA report, leaked in 2002 in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, gave rise to an urban myth that shaped much of the reporting about the scam[6][7][8] were replaced by the much more honest and balanced "In one instance, an American official described allegations of spying as "urban myth".[7]

In the following month and 152 revisions (ie 5 per day) the article ballooned from the 7,853 bytes of the sanitised version to the current 20,557 bytes perhaps as attention became focused on the importance of the topic. While the text of the article has grown nearly 3 times, use of the word "Israel" has grown more than 6 times (up from 5 times to 32 times).

The Wikipedia Zionists are notorious for taking out good references and putting in very poor ones, so it is always worth checking, separately, the bias shown by the choice of references. In this case there is little to see, use of the word "Israel" has "only" doubled from 6 to 12.

Lead of the article, summary of contents

In the US, particularly in the months before the 911 attacks, there were numerous reports of people identifying themselves as Israelis and selling people worthless works of art. The scam caused a number of high-profile espionage allegations against Israel because some of the methods used could easily have been a cover for real spying.

Essentially, the "Israeli art student scam" is a confidence trick (since operated by other nationalities) in which scammers approach people in their homes or on the street and attempt to sell them cheap oil paintings and frames for high prices. The paintings are represented as original and valuable art by up-and-coming talents but are in fact cheap, mass-produced works bought wholesale from China. The scammers explain that they are directly approaching people with offers because properly exhibiting the work in an art gallery would be prohibitively expensive. [1][2][3] Framing is sometimes provided at a later date by mobile vans in order to obtain the phone numbers of willing "marks" and extract as much money as possible

The scam has also been reported in Canada [1], Australia[2], New Zealand [4] Seattle [3] and the Australian Northern Territory police.[5]

2001-2002 Israeli art student spying scandal

During the 2001-2002 period in the United States there were official reports of hundreds of young Israelis posing as art students spying on federal buildings and employees.

In January 2001 Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) field offices around the country reported that the "art students" had been attempting to penetrate offices for over a year, as well as other law enforcement and Department of Defence agencies. They had also visited the homes of many DEA officers and senior federal officials and attempted to sell art. Suspicious agents observed that when the "art students" departed they did not approach their neighbours. DEA Agents reported on 130 incidents involving "art students". Some "art students" were caught diagramming the architecture of federal buildings. Some were found to have photographed federal officials. [9]

According to Jane's Intelligence Digest, in 2002 FBI officials claimed that the "art students" were "running a major eavesdropping operation that had penetrated into the highest echelons of the US administration".[10]

Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive warning

In March 2001, the US Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive (NCIX) issued a warning about people identifying themselves as "Israeli art students" attempting to bypass security and gain entry to federal buildings, and even to the private residences of senior federal officials under the guise of selling art.[11] Subsequent to the NCIX bulletin, officials raised other red flags, including an United States Air Force, a Federal Protective Service (United States), an Office of National Drug Control Policy security alert and a request that the Immigration and Naturalization Service investigate a specific case. The "art students" were subsequently treated with more caution by officials. [9]

Leaked Drug Enforcement Agency report

A leaked 60-page DEA report in 2002 revealed that up to 200 young Israelis had been arrested in America in the past year, of which about 140 were arrested before the September 11 attacks. The other 60 were arrested on October 31, 2002 by the FBI and Immigration and Naturalization Service in San Diego, Kansas City, Cleveland, Houston and St. Louis, Missouri. Rather than selling art, these Israelis were working in kiosks in shopping centres across America selling toys. The FBI was investigating the kiosks as a front operation for espionage activities. The report said that most of the Israelis interrogated by Americans reported having served in the Israeli Defence Force in military intelligence, electronic signals interception and explosive ordnance units. One of the detainees was an Israeli general's son, another was a former bodyguard to the chief of the IDF, and another had operated Patriot missiles.[12][13] In 2002 several officials dismissed reports of a spy ring and said the allegations were made by a Drug Enforcement Agency who was angry his theories had been dismissed.[14]

The DEA report also claims that Israeli companies that had provided telephony services for U.S. businesses and U.S. federal organizations were connected to the "art students" and advised that Israeli telephony companies should be investigated. It raised the possibility that "back doors" had been installed in communications equipment to assist Israeli espionage. [6]

September 11 allegations

It has been suggested that operatives in this "art student spy ring" were tracking the 9/11 hijackers and knew that the attacks were going to take place, although the Drug Enforcement Agency|DEA memo was primarily concerned with the students' efforts to foil investigations into unrelated Israeli organized crime.[15]

German weekly Die Zeit published two articles regarding the September 11 controversy, one of which, titled "Next Door to Mohammed Atta" concerned allegations that Israeli intelligence had been tailing the 911 hijackers before the attack. [16] [17]

Some of the Israeli "art students" lived for a period of time in Hollywood, Florida, the same small city where Mohammed Atta and fellow terrorists had lived before September 11. [9] Michael Ruppert in his book Crossing the Rubicon claimed that the ring had "heavy operations in some areas connected with 9/11". Ruppert and Alexander Cockburn have also argued that there was disproportionate media silence about the issue[18] [19].

Canadian espionage rumors

In August 2004, a number of Israeli "art students" in Calgary, Winnipeg, Saskatoon, Toronto and Ottawa were deported from Canada for working in the country illegally. The Calgary Herald wrote that the deportations "raised the specter of international espionage". However, claims that a spy ring was operating in Canada that were raised by newspapers were dismissed by Canadian officials. Officials noted that the Canadian art scammers did not target government officials or offices but instead focused on wealthy neighbourhoods [20]

Denial of spy ring by officials

In 2002 several officials dismissed reports of a spy ring and said the allegations were made by a Drug Enforcement Agency who was angry his theories had been dismissed. Justice Department spokeswoman Susan Dryden describe the claims as an "urban myth" [21]

Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz also published an article on the spying allegations, noting that most of the allegations were based upon a single internal report from the DEA. It also noted that the U.S. administration was "desperate to keep the affair quiet" [6].

Official Israeli response

The Israeli government has denied the espionage allegations, calling them nonsense. [6]

References

  1. a b c "Israeli art scam" preying on people's kindness Calgary Sun 2009-08-19
  2. a b c Oil painting scam hits the Border Border Mail 2009-04-22.
  3. a b c Information On An Israeli Art Scam Komo News 2006-08-30.
  4. a b Door slammed on ‘original’ art scam Star News Group, 2006-01-18.
  5. a b Police warn against art scam Northern Territory police 2006-11-22.
  6. a b c d Spies, or students? Were the Israelis just trying to sell their paintings, or agents in a massive espionage ring? Haaretz May 7, 2002. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Haaretz" defined multiple times with different content
  7. a b U.S. officials dismiss report of Israeli spies Seattle Times March 7, 2002.
  8. Espionage Ruled Out in Case of Bad Art "Israeli embassy in Ottawa has emphatically denied any link to the students and is dismissing allegations of possible espionage" The Forward September 03, 2004.
  9. a b c The Israeli "art student" mystery Salon.com, 2002-05-07.
  10. Allies and Espionage, Jane's Intelligence Digest, 2002-03-15.
  11. Suspicious Visitors to Federal Facilities Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive (archived at Internet Archive)
  12. US arrests 200 young Israelis in spying investigation Telegraph. 7th March 2002.
  13. Were they part of a massive spy ring which shadowed the 9/11 hijackers and knew that al-Qaeda planned a devastating terrorist attack on the USA? Sunday Herald (UK) via Internet Archive
  14. U.S. officials dismiss report of Israeli spies Washington Post March 7, 2002, Accessed October 18, 2008.
  15. An Enigma: Vast Israeli Spy Network Dismantled in the US. Le Monde (Paris) March 5, 2002. Retrieved 2010-01-12.
  16. Deadly Mistakes Die Zeit, 2002-10-02.
  17. Next Door to Mohammed Atta Die Zeit 2002-10-02.
  18. "Crossing the Rubicon" Michael E. Ruppert, New Society Publishers 2004 ISBN=0865715408, 9780865715400 p.263.
  19. "The Politics of Anti-Semitism" Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St Clair, AK Press p.124 ISBN 1902593774, 9781902593777.
  20. Espionage Ruled Out in Case of Bad Art Forward Magazine.
  21. U.S. officials dismiss report of Israeli spies March 7, 2002 Washington Post. Accessed October 18, 2008.