Difference between revisions of "File:Letter to Shyam Sunder.pdf"

Revision as of 14:10, 29 March 2014

file of unspecified type of unknown authorship

Source: Unknown

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

	Date/Time	Dimensions	User	Comment
current	15:52, 4 June 2010	(134 KB)	Maintenance script (talk)

There are no pages that use this file.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 |DocTypeDraft=No
 |DocTypeCollection=No
+|Recipient=Shyam Sunder
+|RecipientDetail=NIST
 |Subjects=World Trade Center
 |Constitutes=Unanswered question
 |Comment=The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'.
 |Declassified=No
+|Note=A response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth".
 }}
-====A letter to Dr Shyam Sunder of NIST from 'Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth====
-The letter is dated 20 July 2009 and is a response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the
-Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth".
-The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'.
-It challenges NIST on 16 specific points and on behalf of its 4,600 professional signatories, proposes a meeting to explore them. As of June 2010, the proposal has not been taken up.
-[[Category:9/11]]
-[[Category:Building 7]]
-[[Category:Doc]]