Difference between revisions of "File:Letter to Shyam Sunder.pdf"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
letter of unknown authorship dated 2009/07/20
Subjects: World Trade Center
Source: Unknown
A response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth".
Wikispooks Comment
The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'.
m (Text replacement - "|Declassified" to "|declassified") |
m (Text replacement - "|Comment" to "|comment") |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|subjects=World Trade Center | |subjects=World Trade Center | ||
|Constitutes=Unanswered question | |Constitutes=Unanswered question | ||
| − | | | + | |comment=The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'. |
|declassified=No | |declassified=No | ||
|note=A response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth". | |note=A response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth". | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 10:20, 20 July 2014
| A challenge to NIST on 16 specific points and on behalf of its 4,600 professional signatories, proposes a meeting to explore them. A proposal which will likely never be taken up. |
letter of unknown authorship dated 2009/07/20Subjects: World Trade Center
Source: Unknown
A response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth".
Wikispooks Comment
The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'.
★ Start a Discussion about this document
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 15:52, 4 June 2010 | (134 KB) | Maintenance script (talk) |
- You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
There are no pages that use this file.
