Difference between revisions of "File:Letter to Shyam Sunder.pdf"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
letter of unknown authorship to Shyam Sunder dated 2009/07/20
Subjects: World Trade Center
Example of: Unanswered question
Source: Unknown
A response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth".
Wikispooks Comment
The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'.
m (Text replacement - "|Constitutes=" to "|constitutes=") |
m (Text replacement - "typeCollection" to "collection") |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|leaked=No | |leaked=No | ||
|draft=No | |draft=No | ||
| − | | | + | |collection=No |
|recipients=Shyam Sunder | |recipients=Shyam Sunder | ||
|recipientsDetail=NIST | |recipientsDetail=NIST | ||
Revision as of 12:31, 22 December 2014
| A challenge to NIST on 16 specific points and on behalf of its 4,600 professional signatories, proposes a meeting to explore them. A proposal which will likely never be taken up. |
letter of unknown authorship to Shyam Sunder dated 2009/07/20Subjects: World Trade Center
Example of: Unanswered question
Source: Unknown
A response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth".
Wikispooks Comment
The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'.
★ Start a Discussion about this document
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 15:52, 4 June 2010 | (134 KB) | Maintenance script (talk) |
- You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
There are no pages that use this file.
