Difference between revisions of "File:Letter to Shyam Sunder.pdf"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(with template)
(subjects)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DocProv
+
{{Document
|ContentsTitle=A letter to Dr Shyam Sunder of NIST from AE911
+
|title=A letter to Dr Shyam Sunder of NIST from AE911
|Date=2009/07/20
+
|publication_date=2009/07/20
|DocType=letter
+
|type=letter
|Description=A challenge to NIST on 16 specific points and on behalf of its 4,600 professional signatories, proposes a meeting to explore them. A proposal which will likely never be taken up.
+
|description=A challenge to NIST on 16 specific points and on behalf of its 4,600 professional signatories, proposes a meeting to explore them. A proposal which will likely never be taken up.
|Leaked=No
+
|leaked=No
|DocTypeDraft=No
+
|draft=No
|DocTypeCollection=No
+
|collection=No
|Subjects=World Trade Center
+
|recipients=Shyam Sunder
|Constitutes=Unanswered question
+
|authors=Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
|Comment=The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'.
+
|subjects=World Trade Center
|Declassified=No
+
|constitutes=Unanswered question
 +
|comment=The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'.
 +
|note=A response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth".
 
}}
 
}}
====A letter to Dr Shyam Sunder of NIST from 'Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth====
 
 
The letter is dated 20 July 2009 and is a response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the
 
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth".
 
 
The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'.
 
 
It challenges NIST on 16 specific points and on behalf of its 4,600 professional signatories, proposes a meeting to explore them. As of June 2010, the proposal has not been taken up.
 
 
 
 
[[Category:9/11]]
 
[[Category:Building 7]]
 
[[Category:Doc]]
 

Latest revision as of 09:58, 16 April 2016

A challenge to NIST on 16 specific points and on behalf of its 4,600 professional signatories, proposes a meeting to explore them. A proposal which will likely never be taken up.

Disclaimer (#3)Document.png letter  by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth  to Shyam Sunder dated 2009/07/20
Subjects: World Trade Center
Example of: Unanswered question
Source: Unknown

A response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth".

Wikispooks Comment
The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'.

★ Start a Discussion about this document
A letter to Dr Shyam Sunder of NIST from AE911



File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeDimensionsUserComment
current15:52, 4 June 2010 (134 KB)Maintenance script (talk)
  • You cannot overwrite this file.

There are no pages that use this file.