Difference between revisions of "File:Letter to Shyam Sunder.pdf"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
letter by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth to Shyam Sunder dated 2009/07/20
Subjects: World Trade Center
Example of: Unanswered question
Source: Unknown
A response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth".
Wikispooks Comment
The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'.
m (Text replacement - "{{DocProv" to "{{Document") |
(subjects) |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Document | {{Document | ||
− | | | + | |title=A letter to Dr Shyam Sunder of NIST from AE911 |
− | | | + | |publication_date=2009/07/20 |
− | | | + | |type=letter |
− | | | + | |description=A challenge to NIST on 16 specific points and on behalf of its 4,600 professional signatories, proposes a meeting to explore them. A proposal which will likely never be taken up. |
− | | | + | |leaked=No |
− | | | + | |draft=No |
− | | | + | |collection=No |
− | | | + | |recipients=Shyam Sunder |
− | | | + | |authors=Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth |
− | | | + | |subjects=World Trade Center |
− | | | + | |constitutes=Unanswered question |
− | | | + | |comment=The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'. |
− | | | + | |note=A response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth". |
− | |||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 09:58, 16 April 2016
A challenge to NIST on 16 specific points and on behalf of its 4,600 professional signatories, proposes a meeting to explore them. A proposal which will likely never be taken up. |
Subjects: World Trade Center
Example of: Unanswered question
Source: Unknown
A response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth".
Wikispooks Comment
The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'.
★ Start a Discussion about this document
A letter to Dr Shyam Sunder of NIST from AE911
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|
current | 15:52, 4 June 2010 | (134 KB) | Maintenance script (talk) |
- You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
There are no pages that use this file.