Difference between revisions of "File:Letter to Shyam Sunder.pdf"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "|Note" to "|note")
(subjects)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Document
 
{{Document
|ContentsTitle=A letter to Dr Shyam Sunder of NIST from AE911
+
|title=A letter to Dr Shyam Sunder of NIST from AE911
 
|publication_date=2009/07/20
 
|publication_date=2009/07/20
 
|type=letter
 
|type=letter
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|leaked=No
 
|leaked=No
 
|draft=No
 
|draft=No
|typeCollection=No
+
|collection=No
|Recipient=Shyam Sunder
+
|recipients=Shyam Sunder
|RecipientDetail=NIST
+
|authors=Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
 
|subjects=World Trade Center
 
|subjects=World Trade Center
|Constitutes=Unanswered question
+
|constitutes=Unanswered question
|Comment=The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'.
+
|comment=The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'.
|Declassified=No
 
 
|note=A response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth".
 
|note=A response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth".
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 09:58, 16 April 2016

A challenge to NIST on 16 specific points and on behalf of its 4,600 professional signatories, proposes a meeting to explore them. A proposal which will likely never be taken up.

Disclaimer (#3)Document.png letter  by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth  to Shyam Sunder dated 2009/07/20
Subjects: World Trade Center
Example of: Unanswered question
Source: Unknown

A response to Dr Sunder's public statement that “would not be productive to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth".

Wikispooks Comment
The letter is pointed and forthright in its criticism of NIST's explanations of the collapse of the WTC twin towers and especially of building 7 where the only explanation provided has, in NIST's own words 'only a low probability of occurrence'.

★ Start a Discussion about this document
A letter to Dr Shyam Sunder of NIST from AE911



File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeDimensionsUserComment
current15:52, 4 June 2010 (134 KB)Maintenance script (talk)
  • You cannot overwrite this file.

There are no pages that use this file.