Difference between revisions of "Gordon Douglas Brown"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Expanding)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Gordon_Brown.jpg|300px|right|thumb|[[Gordon Douglas Brown|Gordon Brown]], Glasgow-born whistleblower]]
+
[[File:Disappearing_Diamonds_1.jpg|300px|right|thumb|The [http://www.gordonbrownisinnocent.co.uk/index.html website] of whistleblower Gordon Brown]]
'''Gordon Douglas Brown''', the Glasgow-born whistleblower, co-authored a pamphlet entitled "Gordon Brown is Innocent" with [[Laurie Flynn]], after they investigated De Beers' mining practices for Granada Television’s ''World in Action'' programme in 1986:<ref>[http://www.gordonbrownisinnocent.co.uk/pamphlet.html "Gordon Brown is Innocent - The Pamphlet"]</ref>
+
'''Gordon Douglas Brown''' co-authored a pamphlet entitled "Gordon Brown is Innocent" with [[Laurie Flynn]], after they investigated [[De Beers]]' mining practices for Granada Television’s ''World in Action'' documentary film "[[The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds]]" which was broadcast on 28 September 1987:<ref>[http://www.gordonbrownisinnocent.co.uk/pamphlet.html "Gordon Brown is Innocent - The Pamphlet"]</ref>
  
:"Since its foundation just over a century ago De Beers has become one of the most controversial business enterprises in the world. Its business practices in wartime, its use of migrant labour and discriminatory labour practices, its dalliance with apartheid, its clashes with American competition authorities and the United Nations have all been the subject of high controversy. In 2004 De Beers was given a formal criminal conviction in the United States for conspiracy to violate competition law and fined $10 million. In November 2005 the group agreed to pay $295 million to settle price fixing and restraint of trade law suits brought in law courts in Arizona, San Francisco and Trenton, New Jersey.
+
:"Since its foundation just over a century ago [[De Beers]] has become one of the most controversial business enterprises in the world. Its business practices in wartime, its use of migrant labour and discriminatory labour practices, its dalliance with apartheid, its clashes with American competition authorities and the United Nations have all been the subject of high controversy. In 2004 [[De Beers]] was given a formal criminal conviction in the United States for conspiracy to violate competition law and fined $10 million. In November 2005 the group agreed to pay $295 million to settle price fixing and restraint of trade law suits brought in law courts in Arizona, San Francisco and Trenton, New Jersey.
 
 
 
 
:"Whatever its problems in America, De Beers' fortunes are closely tied in with the highly political economy of diamonds in sub-Saharan Africa and with Botswana, South Africa and Namibia in particular. This pamphlet focuses on extraordinary events in the last of these countries. Occupied illegally for decades by apartheid South Africa and with the world’s finest deposits of gem diamonds, Namibia was the building block with which De Beers and its sister company Anglo American assembled the greatest treasure trove of assets in the world of mining. According to statements in the press and on their website Anglo and De Beers are very keen to distance themselves from a troubled past and will henceforth ‘always listen first and then act with openness, honesty and integrity so that our relationships flourish.’ If Gordon Brown’s experience is anything to go by the Anglo/De Beers commitment to integrity and law abiding behaviour has some considerable way to go. The way he has been treated is unconscionable and he calls out for justice and an end to the persistent violations of his human rights."
+
:"Whatever its problems in America, [[De Beers]]' fortunes are closely tied in with the highly political economy of diamonds in sub-Saharan Africa and with Botswana, South Africa and Namibia in particular. This pamphlet focuses on extraordinary events in the last of these countries. Occupied illegally for decades by apartheid South Africa and with the world’s finest deposits of gem diamonds, Namibia was the building block with which [[De Beers]] and its sister company Anglo American assembled the greatest treasure trove of assets in the world of mining. According to statements in the press and on their website Anglo and De Beers are very keen to distance themselves from a troubled past and will henceforth ‘always listen first and then act with openness, honesty and integrity so that our relationships flourish.’ If Gordon Brown’s experience is anything to go by the [[De Beers|Anglo/De Beers]] commitment to integrity and law abiding behaviour has some considerable way to go. The way he has been treated is unconscionable and he calls out for justice and an end to the persistent violations of his human rights."
  
==Evidence against De Beers==
+
==Evidence against [[De Beers]]==
[http://www.gordonbrownisinnocent.co.uk/thedossier.html Gordon Brown's dossier of evidence against De Beers is set out here.]
+
Max du Preez, one of Southern Africa’s most admired reporters, has worked for the ''Financial Mail'', the ''Sunday Times'' and ''SABC''. He was also the founder of ''Die Vrye Weekblad'', closed down by the apartheid government for its fearless reporting of business and political scandals. This is how Max du Preez described the importance of Gordon Brown's evidence against [[De Beers]]:
 +
:"Early in 1984, the issue of CDM’s ‘overmining’ of the Oranjemund mine was again mentioned at hearings into government corruption in Namibia. This time I got hold of a solid source, Gordon Brown, a senior man at [[De Beers]] who had serious moral qualms about what they were doing to the mine. He started briefing me on the technical issues and gave me a number of documents with explosive content.
 +
 
 +
:"An understanding of CDM’s unique position in Namibia is important in order to grasp the overmining story. CDM mined the world’s richest diamond fields in terms of an agreement with the South African administration in Namibia which was bound to act in compliance with a League of Nations mandate to protect the interests of the people of the territory.
 +
 
 +
:"The Halbscheid agreement stated: 'CDM when working an area pegged under this, shall conduct operatiaons as thoroughly and economically as it does on its other mining fields and shall carry on mining satisfactorily to the Administrator and not with a view to exhausting the superficial and more valuable deposits to the detriment of the low grade deposits.'
 +
 
 +
:"The idea was that the diamond field should provide Namibia with a source of revenue and employment for as long as possible. CDM, I wrote in my first piece in the ''Financial Mail'', was in breach of the Halbscheid agreement because it was in mining-speak 'picking the eyes out of the mine' preferentially mining the richer deposits at the expense of the mine’s future profits.
 +
 
 +
:"I had CDM’s own documents to back this up. The smoking gun was a document called 'A life of Mine Review', drawn up by the then manager at Oranjemund Jack Forster in September 1981. Foster used these words: 'To me this is best described as a power dive and unless we have a conscious change in strategy effective some time in the future, we will power the mine into the ground and we will be unable to conduct the reclamation and cleaning operation which could extend the life of the mine by three or four years.'
 +
 
 +
:"The morning of the publication of my story, Mulholland (the editor) walked to my desk, and slammed the magazine down and asked: 'What the hell do you think you are doing?' He said I knew nothing about mining: 'It is clearly news to you that mining companies are in the business for a profit.' I tried to explain about the 1923 agreement but he didn’t want to discuss the merits. He warned me to drop the story.
 +
 
 +
:"I checked with Gordon Brown, who said my story was spot on. I vowed not to leave it there. A few weeks later, when Mulholland was out of town I wrote a follow-up story sticking to my line. Mulholland was livid. He accused me of damaging the reputation of the Financial Mail. I told Mulholland that I thought it was my ethical duty to follow through with the story.
 +
 
 +
:"CDM’s next move was to invite me to a briefing where they would explain everything at 44 Main Street, the Anglo head office in Johannesburg. We met in their impressive boardroom. Mulholland introduced me. As I heard the names and titles, it dawned on me that this was the entire upper hierarchy of the De Beers empire, including the chairman, the Oranjemund mine manager and the top man of the Central Selling Organisation in London.
 +
 
 +
:"I wanted to explain the documents I had in my possession. Clearly annoyed, they explained some of the technical stuff and at more than one point they said that the details would be difficult for a lay-person to comprehend. But Gordon had briefed me well, and I did follow the arguments. I started putting more documents on the table to counter what they were saying, especially the mine manager’s statement that CDM was ‘powering the mine into the ground’. Mulholland silenced me, thanked the [[De Beers]] bosses profusely and apologised for my stubbornness. I was ushered out. This showdown meant the end of my career at the ''Financial Mail''.
 +
 
 +
:"But it wasn’t the end of the CDM story; it was the beginning although the FM would no longer take part in the expose. The FM’s opposition magazine, ''Finance Week'' had by now taken up the story as had the Namibian press.
 +
 
 +
:"Mr Justice Pieter Thirion soon expanded his inquiry into mal-administration in Namibia to include an investigation into the Diamond Industry and the workings of the Diamond Board. Gordon Brown came out of the shadows and gave devastating evidence before Thirion. The Thirion report published in March 1986, vindicated every word I had written, and more. The documents Brown had given me were extensively quoted in the report – and they were given Brown’s interpretation which I in turn used in my reports and in the sham briefing with CDM. Justice Thirion found that CDM had breached the Halbscheid agreement by excessively depleting the Oranjemund diamonds for at least twenty years. The excessive depletion of the deposit was preferential depletion of the more valuable deposits to the detriment of the low grade deposits. The probabilities are that the effect of the excessive depletion of the deposit will be to shorten the life of the mine and to detrimentally affect its profitability towards the end of its life.<ref>[http://www.gordonbrownisinnocent.co.uk/thirionreport.html "The Thirion Report"]</ref>
 +
 
 +
:"The next year Gordon Brown was the star of a powerful Granada documentary shown on ITV, titled [[The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds]]. It found that [[De Beers]] had secretly stripped Namibia of 3 billion rands worth of diamonds through overmining. Brown went on to appear in the BBC documentary 'The Diamond Empire', and became a central figure in the authoritative book by [[Laurie Flynn]] on violations by Southern African mining companies called 'Studded with diamonds and paved with gold'. But Brown was to pay a heavy price for blowing the whistle on [[De Beers]]: first with the reports he gave me; then by giving evidence to Thirion; and finally by appearing in the documentaries.
 +
 
 +
:"An elaborate trap was set for him. He was asked by an acquaintance, a dealer in rough diamonds, to evaluate a parcel of diamonds. Gordon Brown was given an assurance that these were legal diamonds from Angola, and the necessary permits had been issued and the legal requirements complied with. The Diamond and Gold Branch of the Namibian police then pounced and arrested him on an illicit diamond buying charge. He was found guilty in court and sent to jail. Brown claims he was denied the fundamental right to a fair trial. He says his conviction was based on the perjured testimony of a single witness, a [[De Beers]] employee. This witness subsequently confessed in an affadavit made to Namibian justice department officials.
 +
 
 +
:"Shortly after his incarceration, Gordon Brown was released on bail pending an appeal hearing. He tried his best to get the police and justice department to investigate prosecutorial irregularities and misconduct, but nobody would do anything. Brown says he then lost faith in the justice system in Namibia and decided to skip bail. He actually had to swim across the Orange River to his freedom in South Africa. He continued to work in the diamond industry in South Africa.
 +
 
 +
:"As long as [[De Beers]] appointees sit on government regulatory bodies and their security people hold top position in the Gold and Diamond Branch of the Namibian Police," Brown told me, "no serious critic of De Beers can survive criminal charges from the police or [[De Beers]] themselves, and you certainly cannot expect a fair trial on such charges.’
 +
 
 +
:"That’s what happens when you mess with Anglo American."<ref>[http://www.gordonbrownisinnocent.co.uk/thedossier.html "Gordon Brown's dossier of evidence against De Beers"]</ref>
  
 
==[[The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds]]==
 
==[[The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds]]==
Former CDM manager, Gordon Brown, claimed that for 20 years De Beers had been stripping Namibia of its most precious asset - diamonds at Oranjemund.<ref>[http://www.gordonbrownisinnocent.co.uk/thedossier.html "The Dossier"]</ref>
+
[[File:Gordon_Brown.jpg|240px|right|thumb|[[Gordon Douglas Brown|Gordon Brown]] former CDM manager]]
 +
In this documentary film, broadcast on 28 September 1987, former CDM manager, Gordon Brown, claimed that for 20 years [[De Beers]] had been stripping Namibia of its most precious asset - diamonds at Oranjemund:
 
:"Overmining took place on the upper terraces and the 'N' blocks [in the upper terraces, blocks K, L, and M were rich in diamonds and the richest of all were the 'N' blocks] which were the series of beaches situated furthest from the sea. That's where the richest blocks were in terms of grade and stone size. There was a central block between the two major beaches that was of lower grade. That was left behind - the company concentrated on taking out the ore reserves furthest from the sea. That's not good mining practice. Proper mining practice calls for the average ore reserve grade and average stone size. I would liken this to a nice big cream cake, with a sponge cake below. Normally you would take out a slice at a time, but in the case of overmining the cream is completely scraped off the top."
 
:"Overmining took place on the upper terraces and the 'N' blocks [in the upper terraces, blocks K, L, and M were rich in diamonds and the richest of all were the 'N' blocks] which were the series of beaches situated furthest from the sea. That's where the richest blocks were in terms of grade and stone size. There was a central block between the two major beaches that was of lower grade. That was left behind - the company concentrated on taking out the ore reserves furthest from the sea. That's not good mining practice. Proper mining practice calls for the average ore reserve grade and average stone size. I would liken this to a nice big cream cake, with a sponge cake below. Normally you would take out a slice at a time, but in the case of overmining the cream is completely scraped off the top."
 +
 +
==Letter to [[Bernt Carlsson]]==
 +
One month after "[[The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds]]" was broadcast on British television, former Consolidated Diamond Mines manager, Gordon Brown, who was interviewed in the film, wrote from Cape Town to [[Bernt Carlsson]] in New York offering his expert assistance in building the prosecution case against [[De Beers]] for overmining Namibia's diamond gemstones. In his letter, Brown had calculated the quantum and value of diamonds illegally removed from Namibia from 1967, when South-West Africa became the responsibility of the United Nations, until the territory was likely to become independent in 1989/90. By which time, [[De Beers|De Beers/Anglo American]] and the Apartheid State would have illegally removed:
 +
 +
* 44 million Diamonds, weighing
 +
* 33 million Carats, with an average diamond size of
 +
* 0.75 Carats per Diamond.
 +
 +
Gordon Brown estimated the current value of those diamonds amounted to:
 +
[[File:Carlsson_letter_19_Nov_1987.jpg|240px|right|thumb|[[Bernt Carlsson]]'s reply to Gordon Brown]]
 +
* £11.0 billion, ($18.7bn) being Revenue from Diamond Sales (Standard Selling Value)
 +
* £ 3.3 billion, ($ 5.6bn) spent on Working Costs and Capital Expenditure, leaving
 +
* £ 7.7 billion, ($13.1bn) of Working Profit, distributed as follows:
 +
 +
* £ 4.4 billion, ($ 7.5bn) as De Beers/Anglo American’s Profit Share, and
 +
* £ 3.3 billion, ($ 5.6bn) as Apartheid State’s Profit Share through Taxes, Royalties, etc.
 +
 +
[[Bernt Carlsson]] replied by letter dated 19 November 1987 (referenced C-4013):
 +
                                   
 +
:Dear Mr Brown,
 +
 +
:Thank you for your letter dated 20 October 1987, in which you expressed interest to be of assistance to this Office with regard to the over-exploitation of the Namibian diamonds.
 +
 +
:The United Nations Council for Namibia is still in the process of examining the appropriate action to take in order to halt the over-exploitation and depletion of Namibia's diamond resource. I note with interest your extensive experience in and in-depth knowledge of the diamond industry and CDM activities. We will, therefore, retain your letter on our files and, should the need arise, contact you for assistance in the matter.
 +
 +
:Yours truly,
 +
 +
:[[Bernt Carlsson]]
 +
:United Nations Commissioner for Namibia
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
* [[The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds]]
 
 
* [[The how, why and who of Pan Am Flight 103]]
 
* [[The how, why and who of Pan Am Flight 103]]
  

Revision as of 16:07, 29 July 2013

The website of whistleblower Gordon Brown

Gordon Douglas Brown co-authored a pamphlet entitled "Gordon Brown is Innocent" with Laurie Flynn, after they investigated De Beers' mining practices for Granada Television’s World in Action documentary film "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds" which was broadcast on 28 September 1987:[1]

"Since its foundation just over a century ago De Beers has become one of the most controversial business enterprises in the world. Its business practices in wartime, its use of migrant labour and discriminatory labour practices, its dalliance with apartheid, its clashes with American competition authorities and the United Nations have all been the subject of high controversy. In 2004 De Beers was given a formal criminal conviction in the United States for conspiracy to violate competition law and fined $10 million. In November 2005 the group agreed to pay $295 million to settle price fixing and restraint of trade law suits brought in law courts in Arizona, San Francisco and Trenton, New Jersey.
"Whatever its problems in America, De Beers' fortunes are closely tied in with the highly political economy of diamonds in sub-Saharan Africa and with Botswana, South Africa and Namibia in particular. This pamphlet focuses on extraordinary events in the last of these countries. Occupied illegally for decades by apartheid South Africa and with the world’s finest deposits of gem diamonds, Namibia was the building block with which De Beers and its sister company Anglo American assembled the greatest treasure trove of assets in the world of mining. According to statements in the press and on their website Anglo and De Beers are very keen to distance themselves from a troubled past and will henceforth ‘always listen first and then act with openness, honesty and integrity so that our relationships flourish.’ If Gordon Brown’s experience is anything to go by the Anglo/De Beers commitment to integrity and law abiding behaviour has some considerable way to go. The way he has been treated is unconscionable and he calls out for justice and an end to the persistent violations of his human rights."

Evidence against De Beers

Max du Preez, one of Southern Africa’s most admired reporters, has worked for the Financial Mail, the Sunday Times and SABC. He was also the founder of Die Vrye Weekblad, closed down by the apartheid government for its fearless reporting of business and political scandals. This is how Max du Preez described the importance of Gordon Brown's evidence against De Beers:

"Early in 1984, the issue of CDM’s ‘overmining’ of the Oranjemund mine was again mentioned at hearings into government corruption in Namibia. This time I got hold of a solid source, Gordon Brown, a senior man at De Beers who had serious moral qualms about what they were doing to the mine. He started briefing me on the technical issues and gave me a number of documents with explosive content.
"An understanding of CDM’s unique position in Namibia is important in order to grasp the overmining story. CDM mined the world’s richest diamond fields in terms of an agreement with the South African administration in Namibia which was bound to act in compliance with a League of Nations mandate to protect the interests of the people of the territory.
"The Halbscheid agreement stated: 'CDM when working an area pegged under this, shall conduct operatiaons as thoroughly and economically as it does on its other mining fields and shall carry on mining satisfactorily to the Administrator and not with a view to exhausting the superficial and more valuable deposits to the detriment of the low grade deposits.'
"The idea was that the diamond field should provide Namibia with a source of revenue and employment for as long as possible. CDM, I wrote in my first piece in the Financial Mail, was in breach of the Halbscheid agreement because it was in mining-speak 'picking the eyes out of the mine' preferentially mining the richer deposits at the expense of the mine’s future profits.
"I had CDM’s own documents to back this up. The smoking gun was a document called 'A life of Mine Review', drawn up by the then manager at Oranjemund Jack Forster in September 1981. Foster used these words: 'To me this is best described as a power dive and unless we have a conscious change in strategy effective some time in the future, we will power the mine into the ground and we will be unable to conduct the reclamation and cleaning operation which could extend the life of the mine by three or four years.'
"The morning of the publication of my story, Mulholland (the editor) walked to my desk, and slammed the magazine down and asked: 'What the hell do you think you are doing?' He said I knew nothing about mining: 'It is clearly news to you that mining companies are in the business for a profit.' I tried to explain about the 1923 agreement but he didn’t want to discuss the merits. He warned me to drop the story.
"I checked with Gordon Brown, who said my story was spot on. I vowed not to leave it there. A few weeks later, when Mulholland was out of town I wrote a follow-up story sticking to my line. Mulholland was livid. He accused me of damaging the reputation of the Financial Mail. I told Mulholland that I thought it was my ethical duty to follow through with the story.
"CDM’s next move was to invite me to a briefing where they would explain everything at 44 Main Street, the Anglo head office in Johannesburg. We met in their impressive boardroom. Mulholland introduced me. As I heard the names and titles, it dawned on me that this was the entire upper hierarchy of the De Beers empire, including the chairman, the Oranjemund mine manager and the top man of the Central Selling Organisation in London.
"I wanted to explain the documents I had in my possession. Clearly annoyed, they explained some of the technical stuff and at more than one point they said that the details would be difficult for a lay-person to comprehend. But Gordon had briefed me well, and I did follow the arguments. I started putting more documents on the table to counter what they were saying, especially the mine manager’s statement that CDM was ‘powering the mine into the ground’. Mulholland silenced me, thanked the De Beers bosses profusely and apologised for my stubbornness. I was ushered out. This showdown meant the end of my career at the Financial Mail.
"But it wasn’t the end of the CDM story; it was the beginning although the FM would no longer take part in the expose. The FM’s opposition magazine, Finance Week had by now taken up the story as had the Namibian press.
"Mr Justice Pieter Thirion soon expanded his inquiry into mal-administration in Namibia to include an investigation into the Diamond Industry and the workings of the Diamond Board. Gordon Brown came out of the shadows and gave devastating evidence before Thirion. The Thirion report published in March 1986, vindicated every word I had written, and more. The documents Brown had given me were extensively quoted in the report – and they were given Brown’s interpretation which I in turn used in my reports and in the sham briefing with CDM. Justice Thirion found that CDM had breached the Halbscheid agreement by excessively depleting the Oranjemund diamonds for at least twenty years. The excessive depletion of the deposit was preferential depletion of the more valuable deposits to the detriment of the low grade deposits. The probabilities are that the effect of the excessive depletion of the deposit will be to shorten the life of the mine and to detrimentally affect its profitability towards the end of its life.[2]
"The next year Gordon Brown was the star of a powerful Granada documentary shown on ITV, titled The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds. It found that De Beers had secretly stripped Namibia of 3 billion rands worth of diamonds through overmining. Brown went on to appear in the BBC documentary 'The Diamond Empire', and became a central figure in the authoritative book by Laurie Flynn on violations by Southern African mining companies called 'Studded with diamonds and paved with gold'. But Brown was to pay a heavy price for blowing the whistle on De Beers: first with the reports he gave me; then by giving evidence to Thirion; and finally by appearing in the documentaries.
"An elaborate trap was set for him. He was asked by an acquaintance, a dealer in rough diamonds, to evaluate a parcel of diamonds. Gordon Brown was given an assurance that these were legal diamonds from Angola, and the necessary permits had been issued and the legal requirements complied with. The Diamond and Gold Branch of the Namibian police then pounced and arrested him on an illicit diamond buying charge. He was found guilty in court and sent to jail. Brown claims he was denied the fundamental right to a fair trial. He says his conviction was based on the perjured testimony of a single witness, a De Beers employee. This witness subsequently confessed in an affadavit made to Namibian justice department officials.
"Shortly after his incarceration, Gordon Brown was released on bail pending an appeal hearing. He tried his best to get the police and justice department to investigate prosecutorial irregularities and misconduct, but nobody would do anything. Brown says he then lost faith in the justice system in Namibia and decided to skip bail. He actually had to swim across the Orange River to his freedom in South Africa. He continued to work in the diamond industry in South Africa.
"As long as De Beers appointees sit on government regulatory bodies and their security people hold top position in the Gold and Diamond Branch of the Namibian Police," Brown told me, "no serious critic of De Beers can survive criminal charges from the police or De Beers themselves, and you certainly cannot expect a fair trial on such charges.’
"That’s what happens when you mess with Anglo American."[3]

The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds

Gordon Brown former CDM manager

In this documentary film, broadcast on 28 September 1987, former CDM manager, Gordon Brown, claimed that for 20 years De Beers had been stripping Namibia of its most precious asset - diamonds at Oranjemund:

"Overmining took place on the upper terraces and the 'N' blocks [in the upper terraces, blocks K, L, and M were rich in diamonds and the richest of all were the 'N' blocks] which were the series of beaches situated furthest from the sea. That's where the richest blocks were in terms of grade and stone size. There was a central block between the two major beaches that was of lower grade. That was left behind - the company concentrated on taking out the ore reserves furthest from the sea. That's not good mining practice. Proper mining practice calls for the average ore reserve grade and average stone size. I would liken this to a nice big cream cake, with a sponge cake below. Normally you would take out a slice at a time, but in the case of overmining the cream is completely scraped off the top."

Letter to Bernt Carlsson

One month after "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds" was broadcast on British television, former Consolidated Diamond Mines manager, Gordon Brown, who was interviewed in the film, wrote from Cape Town to Bernt Carlsson in New York offering his expert assistance in building the prosecution case against De Beers for overmining Namibia's diamond gemstones. In his letter, Brown had calculated the quantum and value of diamonds illegally removed from Namibia from 1967, when South-West Africa became the responsibility of the United Nations, until the territory was likely to become independent in 1989/90. By which time, De Beers/Anglo American and the Apartheid State would have illegally removed:

  • 44 million Diamonds, weighing
  • 33 million Carats, with an average diamond size of
  • 0.75 Carats per Diamond.

Gordon Brown estimated the current value of those diamonds amounted to:

Bernt Carlsson's reply to Gordon Brown
  • £11.0 billion, ($18.7bn) being Revenue from Diamond Sales (Standard Selling Value)
  • £ 3.3 billion, ($ 5.6bn) spent on Working Costs and Capital Expenditure, leaving
  • £ 7.7 billion, ($13.1bn) of Working Profit, distributed as follows:
  • £ 4.4 billion, ($ 7.5bn) as De Beers/Anglo American’s Profit Share, and
  • £ 3.3 billion, ($ 5.6bn) as Apartheid State’s Profit Share through Taxes, Royalties, etc.

Bernt Carlsson replied by letter dated 19 November 1987 (referenced C-4013):

Dear Mr Brown,
Thank you for your letter dated 20 October 1987, in which you expressed interest to be of assistance to this Office with regard to the over-exploitation of the Namibian diamonds.
The United Nations Council for Namibia is still in the process of examining the appropriate action to take in order to halt the over-exploitation and depletion of Namibia's diamond resource. I note with interest your extensive experience in and in-depth knowledge of the diamond industry and CDM activities. We will, therefore, retain your letter on our files and, should the need arise, contact you for assistance in the matter.
Yours truly,
Bernt Carlsson
United Nations Commissioner for Namibia

See also

References