Difference between revisions of "John Ashton"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Fix categories)
(Expanding and wikifying)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
My objection is to the introduction of the 'drug conspiracy theory' between 1.36 and 2.16, in particular the section 1.55-2.16 and above all the blatantly fraudulent 'hotel room scene' featuring Oswald Le Winter between 2.12.50 and 02.15 (which was longer than the televised version and mentioned the character 'Lovejoy'.)
 
My objection is to the introduction of the 'drug conspiracy theory' between 1.36 and 2.16, in particular the section 1.55-2.16 and above all the blatantly fraudulent 'hotel room scene' featuring Oswald Le Winter between 2.12.50 and 02.15 (which was longer than the televised version and mentioned the character 'Lovejoy'.)
  
In the far briefer televised version of Steve Donahue's 'evidence' he is described as an 'undercover [[DEA]] agent' with no mention of his being a convicted trafficker. The section concerning 'Mr Goldberg' and his supposed meeting with Khald Jafaar is greatly different.
+
In the far briefer televised version of Steve Donahue's 'evidence' he is described as an 'undercover DEA agent' with no mention of his being a convicted trafficker. The section concerning 'Mr Goldberg' and his supposed meeting with Khald Jafaar is greatly different.
  
 
While some of the 'evidence' is this forty-minute section (1.36-2.16) is demonstrably fabricated, my point is that even if these allegations of 'controlled' drug deliveries is true, is it of any relevance to the bombing? I would also point that the only evidence in the film that drugs were recovered at Tundergarth was an article in ''Private Eye'' magazine for whom John Ashton works.
 
While some of the 'evidence' is this forty-minute section (1.36-2.16) is demonstrably fabricated, my point is that even if these allegations of 'controlled' drug deliveries is true, is it of any relevance to the bombing? I would also point that the only evidence in the film that drugs were recovered at Tundergarth was an article in ''Private Eye'' magazine for whom John Ashton works.
Line 22: Line 22:
 
My central criticism of ''Cover-up of Convenience'' is that most of the book was devoted to 'proving' this fraudulent section of the film. Without their obsession with Khalid Jafaar (which continues to this day in the pages of ''Private Eye'') Messrs Ashton and Ferguson might have written an important book.
 
My central criticism of ''Cover-up of Convenience'' is that most of the book was devoted to 'proving' this fraudulent section of the film. Without their obsession with Khalid Jafaar (which continues to this day in the pages of ''Private Eye'') Messrs Ashton and Ferguson might have written an important book.
  
Indeed without the 'drug conspiracy' section ''The Maltese Double Cross'' might have been a good film. Pity [[Alan Francovich|Francovich]] didn't grasp the bomb was introduced at Heathrow."</blockquote>
+
Indeed without the 'drug conspiracy' section ''The Maltese Double Cross'' might have been a good film. Pity [[Allan Francovich|Francovich]] didn't grasp the bomb was introduced at Heathrow."</blockquote>
  
 
The full 2-hour 36-minute version of the film is available [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B5hv6scbBo here] on ''YouTube''.  
 
The full 2-hour 36-minute version of the film is available [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B5hv6scbBo here] on ''YouTube''.  
  
 
==By the same author==
 
==By the same author==
 +
John Ashton has written the following books and articles on the [[Lockerbie bombing]]:<ref>[http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=4474406052477&l=1e52343dc9 "Lockerbie Cover-Upper Ian Ferguson"]</ref>
 +
 +
==="Cover-Up of Convenience"===
 +
Following the Libyan [[Abdelbaset al-Megrahi]]’s conviction for the [[Lockerbie bombing]] on 31 January 2001, John Ashton co-wrote a book entitled "Cover-Up of Convenience: The Hidden Scandal of Lockerbie" with fellow journalist [[Ian Ferguson]].<ref>[http://www.amazon.co.uk/Cover-up-Convenience-Hidden-Scandal-Lockerbie/dp/1845966635 "Cover-Up of Convenience: The Hidden Scandal of Lockerbie"]</ref>
 +
According to a review of the book in ''The Observer'' on 17 June 2001:<ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/theobserver/2001/jun/17/politics "The show trial must go on"] ''The Observer'', 17 June 2001.</ref>
 +
:"If 'Cover-Up of Convenience' occasionally loses narrative focus, that is hardly surprising bearing in mind the difficulties with co-authors on opposite sides of the Atlantic, and the speed with which this book has been produced."
 +
 +
According to the blurb:
 +
:"Based on many years’ research, this book demonstrates that the truth was buried to protect the hidden agendas of Western policy in the Middle East, demolishing the case against Libya, it presents shocking evidence that the terrorist masterminds lay in Iran, Syria and Lebanon and also raises questions against the Western intelligence services."
 +
 +
"Cover-Up of Convenience"’s 'Index' runs to 14 pages but the name of the highest profile Lockerbie victim [[Bernt Carlsson]] is nowhere to be found. Which turns out to be a very revealing omission since the 'Acknowledgments' page states:
 +
:"A multitude of people warrant acknowledgment, far too many, in fact, to list here. The relatives of the Lockerbie victims deserve particular thanks, chief among them Martin and Rita Cadman, Pam Dix, John and Lisa Mosey, '''Sanya Popovic''' and Jim and Jane Swire."
 +
:"Fellow journalists gave generous help, including '''[[Jan-Olof Bengtsson]]''', Ronen Bergman, '''John Coates''', John Cooley, Con Coughlin, Don Devereux, Rob Evans, Paul Foot, Drago Hedl, Bjorn Hygstedt, David Jessel, Shelley Jofre, David Johnston, Jürgen Krönig, Gunter Latsch, John Loftus, Neil Mackay, Joe Mifsud, David Milne, Mats-Eric Nilsson, Margaret Renn, Murdoch Rodgers, Frank Ryan, Kjetil Stormark, Phillip Wearne, Terry Wrong and David Yallop."
 +
 +
The three acknowledged names in bold are closely linked to [[Bernt Carlsson]], as follows:
 +
 +
====Sanya Popovic====
 +
Sanya Popovic is the former fiancée of [[Bernt Carlsson]] and in 1999 she wrote a "Message of Spring":<ref>[http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1495547302870&l=62238388e7 "Sanya Popovic's Message of Spring"]</ref>
 +
:In the eleven and a half years that have passed since the bombing of [[Pan Am Flight 103|Pan Am 103]], I have learned so very much about love and grief and life. I recall how excruciatingly painful the first spring was after the bombing – and indeed so many springs thereafter. How possibly could life be springing anew everywhere, when the man I loved was dead, and it seemed as though my soul, too, was dying within. Somewhere along the way, though, I began to see that the message of spring was a powerful and universal one, found in so many religions and different cultures. It was hardly a surprise that within the Christian faith, the death and resurrection of Christ was said to happen in the spring....I began to find first, solace and later, hope, in the fact that the way of the world is that life, no matter what, begins again. And as long as there is life, and renewal, there is hope. So this year, my eleventh spring post-Pan Am 103, I do feel that my late fiancé is with me, in my heart, looking at the joy and beauty of spring.
 +
-Sanya Popovic, NY, lost her late fiancé on [[Pan Am Flight 103]], December 21, 1988
 +
 +
====[[Jan-Olof Bengtsson]]====
 +
[[Jan-Olof Bengtsson]] is the political editor of Kvällsposten newspaper in Malmö, Sweden, and a renowned investigative journalist. Mr Bengtsson's most important work - although perhaps the least publicised - is his series of three articles in Sweden's ''iDAG'' newspaper on 12, 13 and 14 March 1990. Never published in the English language, the ''iDAG'' articles featured Sweden's UN Commissioner for Namibia [[Bernt Carlsson]] who was the most prominent victim of [[Pan Am Flight 103]] which was sabotaged over Lockerbie, Scotland on 21 December 1988. Bengtsson alleged that Commissioner Carlsson's arm had been twisted by the diamond mining giant De Beers into making a stopover in London for a secret meeting and into joining the doomed flight, rather than taking as he had intended a Sabena flight direct from Brussels to New York.<ref>[http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1954080085903&l=8adc771e0f "Bernt Carlsson's secret meeting in London"]</ref>
 +
 +
====John Coates====
 +
John Coates interviewed [[Bernt Carlsson]] in Granada TV’s ''World In Action'' documentary "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds" and narrated this introduction:
 +
:"The United Nations Council for Namibia enacted in 1974 a Decree for the Protection of the Natural Resources of Namibia, under which no person or entity could search for, take or distribute any natural resources found in Namibia without the Council's permission. Any person or entity contravening the Decree could be held liable for damages by the future government of an independent Namibia. Companies like De Beers have ignored the law but now attitudes at the UN are beginning to harden."
 +
:The man responsible for Namibia under international law, Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and UN Commissioner for Namibia, [[Bernt Carlsson]], was asked about Namibia's diamonds: "The corporation has been trying to skim the cream which means they have gone for the large diamonds at the expense of the steady pace. In this way they have really shortened the lifespan of the mines. One would expect from a worldwide corporation like De Beers and Anglo American that they would behave with an element of social and political responsibility. But their behaviour in the specific case of Namibia has been one of profit maximisation regardless of its social, economic, political and even legal responsibility. The United Nations this year [1987] in July started legal action against one such firm – the Dutch company URENCO which imports uranium."
 +
 +
:John Coates: "Will you be taking action against other companies such as De Beers?"
 +
 +
:[[Bernt Carlsson]] replied: "All the companies which are carrying out activities in Namibia which have not been authorised by the United Nations are being studied at present."
 +
 +
''World In Action'' documentary "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds" was broadcast by Thames Television on 28 September 1987. Credits: Camera: Howard Somers; Sound: David Woods; Film Editors: Oral Ottey, John Rutherford; Dubbing Mixer: John Whitworth; Production Assistants: Adele McLoughlin, Judith Fraser; Investigation by: Laurie Flynn and '''John Coates'''; Editor: Stuart Prebble; Executive Producer: Ray Fitzwalter.]<ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHIDaGrIsmY "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds"]</ref>
 +
 +
Coincidentally, John Coates was the narrator in a special ''People & Power'' report entitled "Lockerbie: A Cover-Up of Convenience" for Al-Jazeera in 2006.<ref>[http://plane-truth.com/images/Transcript%20Dec.22,2006%20Lockerbie%20AlJazeera%20article.htm "Lockerbie: A Cover-Up of Convenience"] Al-Jazeera, 22 December 2006</ref>
 +
 +
==="[[Megrahi]]: You are my Jury"===
 
[[File:John_Ashton.jpg|400px|thumb|right|John Ashton, author of the 2012 book "Megrahi: You are my Jury"]]
 
[[File:John_Ashton.jpg|400px|thumb|right|John Ashton, author of the 2012 book "Megrahi: You are my Jury"]]
John Ashton has written the following books and articles on the [[Lockerbie bombing]] without any mention of [[Bernt Carlsson]]:
+
In 2012, John Ashton's book "[[Megrahi]]: You are my Jury" was published.<ref>[http://www.megrahiyouaremyjury.net/ "Megrahi: You are my Jury"]</ref>
 +
[[Dr John Cameron]] reviewed John Ashton's 2012 book, as follows:
 +
:"I read John Ashton's 500-page tour de force "[[Megrahi]]: You Are My Jury" at a sitting and though I would not expect anyone else to do so it is an invaluable 'source' for the public. His dissection of the trial in general and the 80-page judgement of Lords Sutherland, Coulsfield and MacLean in particular make compelling if disturbing reading.
 +
 
 +
:"The British public, media and politicians have a spectacularly poor knowledge of science and technology as debates over such things as windfarms and GM crops makes clear. It would be unreasonable to expect our Law Lords, classically educated at public schools where the teaching of science was bad and technology non-existent, to be any better. It was therefore only to be expected they would struggle to comprehend the weakness of the forensic evidence or to understand the operation of Frankfurt airport's X-ray security. Yet, as the UN observer wrote, that does not excuse their reliance on the partial evidence from wholly unreliable witnesses to reach a verdict 'beyond any reasonable doubt'. The Crown's case was that [[Abdelbaset al-Megrahi]] and Lamin Fhimah, acting together, smuggled the bomb on board a feeder flight from Malta in unaccompanied baggage. The Prosecution insisted they were either both innocent or both guilty however the only evidence linking Fhimah to this scenario depended on the evidence of one witness. This was Majid Giaka, a CIA informant, and by the time Fhimah's counsel, Richard Keen, had finished with him it was clear Giaka was both a liar and a fantasist.
 +
 
 +
:"I thought the trial was over and though it still dragged on with increasing absurdity I was not surprised when the Crown closed that Keen submitted Fhimah had no case to answer. However, I had not counted on Alastair Campbell, who led the Crown's case, informing the court he was dropping the conspiracy charge i.e. separating al-Megrahi and Fhimah. This was allowed but conspiracy was the basis of the case so I asked a leading figure in our judiciary if they could do that and he said the Law Lords could do what they liked.
 +
 
 +
:"When I replied that was illogical and unfair he archly responded, 'Show me where it says Scots Law must be logical and fair,' and an historic miscarriage of justice was inevitable."<ref>[http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R19A88RVUYWDNY/ref=cm_cr_pr_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN=1780270151&linkCode=&nodeID=&tag= "[[John Urquhart Cameron|Dr Cameron]]'s review of John Ashton's 2012 book"]</ref>
  
#The 2001 book "Cover-up of Convenience" by John Ashton and [[Ian Ferguson]].<ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/theobserver/2001/jun/17/politics The show trial must go on] ''The Observer'', 17 June 2001.</ref>
+
==="Was Libya really behind it?"===
#The 2012 book "[[Megrahi]]: You are my Jury" by John Ashton.<ref>[http://www.megrahiyouaremyjury.net/ "Megrahi: You are my Jury"]</ref> and,
+
John Ashton contributed to this 2012 article which appeared in the Swiss magazine ''Beobachter''.<ref>[http://www.beobachter.ch/justiz-behoerde/gesetze-recht/artikel/lockerbie_steckte-wirklich-libyen-dahinter/ "Was Libya really behind it?"]</ref>
#The 2012 article <ref>[http://www.beobachter.ch/justiz-behoerde/gesetze-recht/artikel/lockerbie_steckte-wirklich-libyen-dahinter/ "Was Libya really behind it?"]</ref>
 
  
 +
==Other publications==
 
In 1988, John Ashton co-wrote a leaflet entitled ''Blood on their Rands: an investigation into the worldwide activities of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BTR_plc British Tyre & Rubber Co Ltd (BTR)''], with the help of the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa.<ref>[http://catalogue.bl.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?dscnt=0&vl%28174399379UI0%29=any&frbg&scp.scps=scope%3A%28BLCONTENT%29&tab=local_tab&dstmp=1345036811803&srt=rank&ct=search&mode=Basic&dum=true&tb=t&indx=1&vl%28freeText0%29=blood+on+their+rands+liz+hunt+John+Ashton&vid=BLVU1&fn=search "Leaflet written in 1988 by John Ashton"] with the help of the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa</ref>
 
In 1988, John Ashton co-wrote a leaflet entitled ''Blood on their Rands: an investigation into the worldwide activities of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BTR_plc British Tyre & Rubber Co Ltd (BTR)''], with the help of the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa.<ref>[http://catalogue.bl.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?dscnt=0&vl%28174399379UI0%29=any&frbg&scp.scps=scope%3A%28BLCONTENT%29&tab=local_tab&dstmp=1345036811803&srt=rank&ct=search&mode=Basic&dum=true&tb=t&indx=1&vl%28freeText0%29=blood+on+their+rands+liz+hunt+John+Ashton&vid=BLVU1&fn=search "Leaflet written in 1988 by John Ashton"] with the help of the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa</ref>
  
 
==Website==
 
==Website==
 
 
John Ashton's website is [http://www.megrahiyouaremyjury.net/ here].
 
John Ashton's website is [http://www.megrahiyouaremyjury.net/ here].
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
 
*[http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=4039118090550&l=b196eb1f33 "John Ashton's Lockerbie dictum: 'Don't mention Bernt Carlsson'!"]
 
*[http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=4039118090550&l=b196eb1f33 "John Ashton's Lockerbie dictum: 'Don't mention Bernt Carlsson'!"]
 
*[http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=4025127820802&l=1e2cb3498a "Lockerbie Spotlight on John Ashton"]
 
*[http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=4025127820802&l=1e2cb3498a "Lockerbie Spotlight on John Ashton"]

Revision as of 18:00, 17 May 2013

Template:WSUser

John Ashton, author, journalist and film researcher

John Ashton is a British author, journalist and film researcher who is focused on the Lockerbie Bombing of December 1988.

Maltese Double Cross

John Ashton was researcher for the 1994 documentary film The Maltese Double Cross - Lockerbie about the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103. The film propounded a "drug conspiracy theory" as the motive for the bombing, a theory which was been ridiculed by Barry Walker as follows:[1]

"Having watched the version televised by Channel 4 before the 'Lockerbie debate' many times I found this version of The Maltese Double Cross fascinating. It is far longer than the televised version and is significantly different.

I have long been a critic of The Maltese Double Cross and Cover-up of Convenience written by the film's researcher John Ashton and Ian Ferguson.

I have no objection to the first 1 hour and 36 minutes which was, to be honest, really very good.

My objection is to the introduction of the 'drug conspiracy theory' between 1.36 and 2.16, in particular the section 1.55-2.16 and above all the blatantly fraudulent 'hotel room scene' featuring Oswald Le Winter between 2.12.50 and 02.15 (which was longer than the televised version and mentioned the character 'Lovejoy'.)

In the far briefer televised version of Steve Donahue's 'evidence' he is described as an 'undercover DEA agent' with no mention of his being a convicted trafficker. The section concerning 'Mr Goldberg' and his supposed meeting with Khald Jafaar is greatly different.

While some of the 'evidence' is this forty-minute section (1.36-2.16) is demonstrably fabricated, my point is that even if these allegations of 'controlled' drug deliveries is true, is it of any relevance to the bombing? I would also point that the only evidence in the film that drugs were recovered at Tundergarth was an article in Private Eye magazine for whom John Ashton works.

I also note that the evidence of Linda Forsyth that Matthew Gannon was sitting in 1st class was expunged although elsewhere the film claims on two other occasions that he was (once in Le Winter's staged 'evidence'). The official version is that he was in Business Class.

My central criticism of Cover-up of Convenience is that most of the book was devoted to 'proving' this fraudulent section of the film. Without their obsession with Khalid Jafaar (which continues to this day in the pages of Private Eye) Messrs Ashton and Ferguson might have written an important book.

Indeed without the 'drug conspiracy' section The Maltese Double Cross might have been a good film. Pity Francovich didn't grasp the bomb was introduced at Heathrow."

The full 2-hour 36-minute version of the film is available here on YouTube.

By the same author

John Ashton has written the following books and articles on the Lockerbie bombing:[2]

"Cover-Up of Convenience"

Following the Libyan Abdelbaset al-Megrahi’s conviction for the Lockerbie bombing on 31 January 2001, John Ashton co-wrote a book entitled "Cover-Up of Convenience: The Hidden Scandal of Lockerbie" with fellow journalist Ian Ferguson.[3] According to a review of the book in The Observer on 17 June 2001:[4]

"If 'Cover-Up of Convenience' occasionally loses narrative focus, that is hardly surprising bearing in mind the difficulties with co-authors on opposite sides of the Atlantic, and the speed with which this book has been produced."

According to the blurb:

"Based on many years’ research, this book demonstrates that the truth was buried to protect the hidden agendas of Western policy in the Middle East, demolishing the case against Libya, it presents shocking evidence that the terrorist masterminds lay in Iran, Syria and Lebanon and also raises questions against the Western intelligence services."

"Cover-Up of Convenience"’s 'Index' runs to 14 pages but the name of the highest profile Lockerbie victim Bernt Carlsson is nowhere to be found. Which turns out to be a very revealing omission since the 'Acknowledgments' page states:

"A multitude of people warrant acknowledgment, far too many, in fact, to list here. The relatives of the Lockerbie victims deserve particular thanks, chief among them Martin and Rita Cadman, Pam Dix, John and Lisa Mosey, Sanya Popovic and Jim and Jane Swire."
"Fellow journalists gave generous help, including Jan-Olof Bengtsson, Ronen Bergman, John Coates, John Cooley, Con Coughlin, Don Devereux, Rob Evans, Paul Foot, Drago Hedl, Bjorn Hygstedt, David Jessel, Shelley Jofre, David Johnston, Jürgen Krönig, Gunter Latsch, John Loftus, Neil Mackay, Joe Mifsud, David Milne, Mats-Eric Nilsson, Margaret Renn, Murdoch Rodgers, Frank Ryan, Kjetil Stormark, Phillip Wearne, Terry Wrong and David Yallop."

The three acknowledged names in bold are closely linked to Bernt Carlsson, as follows:

Sanya Popovic

Sanya Popovic is the former fiancée of Bernt Carlsson and in 1999 she wrote a "Message of Spring":[5]

In the eleven and a half years that have passed since the bombing of Pan Am 103, I have learned so very much about love and grief and life. I recall how excruciatingly painful the first spring was after the bombing – and indeed so many springs thereafter. How possibly could life be springing anew everywhere, when the man I loved was dead, and it seemed as though my soul, too, was dying within. Somewhere along the way, though, I began to see that the message of spring was a powerful and universal one, found in so many religions and different cultures. It was hardly a surprise that within the Christian faith, the death and resurrection of Christ was said to happen in the spring....I began to find first, solace and later, hope, in the fact that the way of the world is that life, no matter what, begins again. And as long as there is life, and renewal, there is hope. So this year, my eleventh spring post-Pan Am 103, I do feel that my late fiancé is with me, in my heart, looking at the joy and beauty of spring.

-Sanya Popovic, NY, lost her late fiancé on Pan Am Flight 103, December 21, 1988

Jan-Olof Bengtsson

Jan-Olof Bengtsson is the political editor of Kvällsposten newspaper in Malmö, Sweden, and a renowned investigative journalist. Mr Bengtsson's most important work - although perhaps the least publicised - is his series of three articles in Sweden's iDAG newspaper on 12, 13 and 14 March 1990. Never published in the English language, the iDAG articles featured Sweden's UN Commissioner for Namibia Bernt Carlsson who was the most prominent victim of Pan Am Flight 103 which was sabotaged over Lockerbie, Scotland on 21 December 1988. Bengtsson alleged that Commissioner Carlsson's arm had been twisted by the diamond mining giant De Beers into making a stopover in London for a secret meeting and into joining the doomed flight, rather than taking as he had intended a Sabena flight direct from Brussels to New York.[6]

John Coates

John Coates interviewed Bernt Carlsson in Granada TV’s World In Action documentary "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds" and narrated this introduction:

"The United Nations Council for Namibia enacted in 1974 a Decree for the Protection of the Natural Resources of Namibia, under which no person or entity could search for, take or distribute any natural resources found in Namibia without the Council's permission. Any person or entity contravening the Decree could be held liable for damages by the future government of an independent Namibia. Companies like De Beers have ignored the law but now attitudes at the UN are beginning to harden."
The man responsible for Namibia under international law, Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and UN Commissioner for Namibia, Bernt Carlsson, was asked about Namibia's diamonds: "The corporation has been trying to skim the cream which means they have gone for the large diamonds at the expense of the steady pace. In this way they have really shortened the lifespan of the mines. One would expect from a worldwide corporation like De Beers and Anglo American that they would behave with an element of social and political responsibility. But their behaviour in the specific case of Namibia has been one of profit maximisation regardless of its social, economic, political and even legal responsibility. The United Nations this year [1987] in July started legal action against one such firm – the Dutch company URENCO which imports uranium."
John Coates: "Will you be taking action against other companies such as De Beers?"
Bernt Carlsson replied: "All the companies which are carrying out activities in Namibia which have not been authorised by the United Nations are being studied at present."

World In Action documentary "The Case of the Disappearing Diamonds" was broadcast by Thames Television on 28 September 1987. Credits: Camera: Howard Somers; Sound: David Woods; Film Editors: Oral Ottey, John Rutherford; Dubbing Mixer: John Whitworth; Production Assistants: Adele McLoughlin, Judith Fraser; Investigation by: Laurie Flynn and John Coates; Editor: Stuart Prebble; Executive Producer: Ray Fitzwalter.][7]

Coincidentally, John Coates was the narrator in a special People & Power report entitled "Lockerbie: A Cover-Up of Convenience" for Al-Jazeera in 2006.[8]

"Megrahi: You are my Jury"

John Ashton, author of the 2012 book "Megrahi: You are my Jury"

In 2012, John Ashton's book "Megrahi: You are my Jury" was published.[9] Dr John Cameron reviewed John Ashton's 2012 book, as follows:

"I read John Ashton's 500-page tour de force "Megrahi: You Are My Jury" at a sitting and though I would not expect anyone else to do so it is an invaluable 'source' for the public. His dissection of the trial in general and the 80-page judgement of Lords Sutherland, Coulsfield and MacLean in particular make compelling if disturbing reading.
"The British public, media and politicians have a spectacularly poor knowledge of science and technology as debates over such things as windfarms and GM crops makes clear. It would be unreasonable to expect our Law Lords, classically educated at public schools where the teaching of science was bad and technology non-existent, to be any better. It was therefore only to be expected they would struggle to comprehend the weakness of the forensic evidence or to understand the operation of Frankfurt airport's X-ray security. Yet, as the UN observer wrote, that does not excuse their reliance on the partial evidence from wholly unreliable witnesses to reach a verdict 'beyond any reasonable doubt'. The Crown's case was that Abdelbaset al-Megrahi and Lamin Fhimah, acting together, smuggled the bomb on board a feeder flight from Malta in unaccompanied baggage. The Prosecution insisted they were either both innocent or both guilty however the only evidence linking Fhimah to this scenario depended on the evidence of one witness. This was Majid Giaka, a CIA informant, and by the time Fhimah's counsel, Richard Keen, had finished with him it was clear Giaka was both a liar and a fantasist.
"I thought the trial was over and though it still dragged on with increasing absurdity I was not surprised when the Crown closed that Keen submitted Fhimah had no case to answer. However, I had not counted on Alastair Campbell, who led the Crown's case, informing the court he was dropping the conspiracy charge i.e. separating al-Megrahi and Fhimah. This was allowed but conspiracy was the basis of the case so I asked a leading figure in our judiciary if they could do that and he said the Law Lords could do what they liked.
"When I replied that was illogical and unfair he archly responded, 'Show me where it says Scots Law must be logical and fair,' and an historic miscarriage of justice was inevitable."[10]

"Was Libya really behind it?"

John Ashton contributed to this 2012 article which appeared in the Swiss magazine Beobachter.[11]

Other publications

In 1988, John Ashton co-wrote a leaflet entitled Blood on their Rands: an investigation into the worldwide activities of the British Tyre & Rubber Co Ltd (BTR), with the help of the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa.[12]

Website

John Ashton's website is here.

External links

References