Difference between revisions of "User talk:MaintenanceBot"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Explain: new section)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Welcome to Wikispooks! ==
+
{{talk}}
 +
This is the right place for discussion about [[User:MaintenanceBot]].
 +
<hr/>
  
<big>We're glad you came.</big><br/>
+
==Other things it could do==
You will probably want to read the [[Help:Contents|help pages]].<br/>
+
This is for fairly well defined tasks:
The page at [[WikiSpooks:Getting Started]] should help you get started. [[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:55, 4 December 2013 (GMT)
+
# Upload missing images from [[Wikipedia]]
 +
# Check URLs and tag those which have link rot
 +
# Highlighting deprecated template usages
 +
# Highlighting pages which are lacking an [[SMWObject]]
  
== Explain ==
+
==See Also==
 +
* [[user:UpgradeBot]] - for one off data updates
  
The UN is self-explanatory but can you say briefly what you have in mind please --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:57, 4 December 2013 (GMT)
+
== MaintenanceBot misbehaviour ==
 +
 
 +
MaintenanceBot is not without issues, not least since the sites it crossreferences are themselves moving targets. Over the years however, it has proved pretty stable. This is the place for recording bad edits:
 +
 
 +
* [[Hakluyt]] - the bot does not respect its redirection to [[Hakluyt & Company]].
 +
 
 +
===Jobs===
 +
It has a tendency to double up jobs.

Latest revision as of 12:49, 22 November 2018

This is the right place for discussion about User:MaintenanceBot.


Other things it could do

This is for fairly well defined tasks:

  1. Upload missing images from Wikipedia
  2. Check URLs and tag those which have link rot
  3. Highlighting deprecated template usages
  4. Highlighting pages which are lacking an SMWObject

See Also

MaintenanceBot misbehaviour

MaintenanceBot is not without issues, not least since the sites it crossreferences are themselves moving targets. Over the years however, it has proved pretty stable. This is the place for recording bad edits:

Jobs

It has a tendency to double up jobs.