Difference between revisions of "Wikispooks talk:Semantic Objects"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Descriptions, descriptions, descriptions) |
(How to choose objects) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Other Possible Objects== | ==Other Possible Objects== | ||
| − | * Nation ( | + | * Nation State (Sub-object of [[Group]] is good - associate with a ''place'') |
| − | * | + | * Place |
* Ideology | * Ideology | ||
| − | * Company ( | + | * Company (Sub-object of [[Group]] is good) |
''Exactly how to define sub-objects is an open question as yet.'' | ''Exactly how to define sub-objects is an open question as yet.'' | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
::I reckon descriptions are the biggest shortfall at the moment. Well, also some important pages to connect the documents, but that cache is where most of the information is, a good wodge of source material. If you've read the document then making a good description can be very easy, so I recommend you work on that - synopses also good as and when, but I suggest descriptions first, now that there are all those empty boxes in the SMWDocs tables. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 16:13, 7 January 2014 (GMT) | ::I reckon descriptions are the biggest shortfall at the moment. Well, also some important pages to connect the documents, but that cache is where most of the information is, a good wodge of source material. If you've read the document then making a good description can be very easy, so I recommend you work on that - synopses also good as and when, but I suggest descriptions first, now that there are all those empty boxes in the SMWDocs tables. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 16:13, 7 January 2014 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Approach to defining objects== | ||
| + | I'm just eyeballing [[Category:Content]] looking for how this content can easily be represented semantically. I expect there'll be about 8-10 top level objects. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 12:53, 12 January 2014 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 12:53, 12 January 2014
Other Possible Objects
- Nation State (Sub-object of Group is good - associate with a place)
- Place
- Ideology
- Company (Sub-object of Group is good)
Exactly how to define sub-objects is an open question as yet.
- Agreed your last sentence :-)). I guess there's little option but to grow the 'property tree' like categories - but with the benefit of hindsight and thus a tad more thought.
- I also agree that list with people and events at the top of the priority order. Need to be clear about books too. We currently have maybe 100 full books (Category:EBooks) plus assorted book reviews, extracts and synopses. We probably need 'Sysnopsis' as another sub-property of 'Document' too. Re latest email exchange with Joel van der Reijden, I can see me doing lots of those. --Peter P (talk) 07:19, 7 January 2014 (GMT)
- I reckon descriptions are the biggest shortfall at the moment. Well, also some important pages to connect the documents, but that cache is where most of the information is, a good wodge of source material. If you've read the document then making a good description can be very easy, so I recommend you work on that - synopses also good as and when, but I suggest descriptions first, now that there are all those empty boxes in the SMWDocs tables. Robin (talk) 16:13, 7 January 2014 (GMT)
Approach to defining objects
I'm just eyeballing looking for how this content can easily be represented semantically. I expect there'll be about 8-10 top level objects. Robin (talk) 12:53, 12 January 2014 (GMT)
