Difference between revisions of "Hammarskjöld Commission"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Expanding and referencing)
m
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Hammarskjöld Commission''' was established in July 2012 as a voluntary body of four international jurists who were invited by an international Enabling Committee to report whether, in their view, the evidence now available would justify the United Nations in reopening its inquiry into the cause of death of UN Secretary-General [[Dag Hammarskjöld]], pursuant to General Assembly resolution 1759 (XVII) of 26 October 1962.<ref>[http://www.hammarskjoldcommission.org/ "Hammarskjöld Commission Mandate"]</ref>
+
The '''Hammarskjöld Commission''' was established in July 2012 as a voluntary body of four international jurists who were invited by an international [[Enabling Committee]] to report whether, in their view, the evidence now available would justify the United Nations in reopening its inquiry into the cause of death of UN Secretary-General [[Dag Hammarskjöld]], pursuant to General Assembly resolution 1759 (XVII) of 26 October 1962.<ref>[http://www.hammarskjoldcommission.org/ "Hammarskjöld Commission Mandate"]</ref>
  
 
==Four Commissioners==
 
==Four Commissioners==

Revision as of 21:02, 24 November 2013

The Hammarskjöld Commission was established in July 2012 as a voluntary body of four international jurists who were invited by an international Enabling Committee to report whether, in their view, the evidence now available would justify the United Nations in reopening its inquiry into the cause of death of UN Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjöld, pursuant to General Assembly resolution 1759 (XVII) of 26 October 1962.[1]

Four Commissioners

The Hammarskjöld Commission comprised a team of four international jurists:[2]

Sir Stephen Sedley

The Rt Hon. Sir Stephen Sedley (Chair) became a Lord Justice of Appeal in 1999, and has sat on the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and as a judge ad hoc of the European Court of Human Rights. He retired from the bench in March 2011 and has since been a Visiting Professor of Law at Oxford University.

Ambassador Hans Corell

Ambassador Hans Corell was Under-Secretary-General for Legal Affairs and the Legal Counsel of the United Nations from March 1994 to March 2004. He was Ambassador and Under-Secretary for Legal and Consular Affairs in the Ministry for Foreign Affairs in Sweden from 1984 to 1994. From 1962 to 1984 he served in the Ministry of Justice and in the Swedish Judiciary, where he was appointed Judge of Appeal in 1980.

Judge Richard Goldstone

Judge Richard Goldstone served as a judge of the Constitutional Court of South Africa from July 1994 to October 2003. From 1991 to 1994 he served as the chairperson of the Commission of Inquiry Regarding Public Violence and Intimidation (the Goldstone Commission). He was the first Chief Prosecutor of the United Nations International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda.

Justice Wilhelmina Thomassen

Justice Wilhelmina Thomassen served as a judge of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg from 1998 to 2004 and as a judge of the Supreme Court of The Netherlands in the Court’s criminal section from 2004 to 2012. Before that she practised at the Bar and has been a professor of international human rights law, a judge and vice-president of The Hague Regional Court and a justice and vice-president of The Hague Court of Appeal.

Background

Dag Hammarskjöld was Secretary-General of the United Nations from 1953 to 1961. On the night of 17-18 September 1961, in the course of a UN mission to try to bring peace to the Congo, Hammarskjöld’s Swedish-owned and -crewed plane crashed near Ndola airport in the British protectorate of Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia). All the passengers and crew died.

The open verdict reached by a UN Commission of Inquiry in 1961-62 prompted resolution 1759 (XVII) of 26 October 1962, which requests the Secretary-General to inform the General Assembly of "any new evidence which may come to his attention."

In the course of the intervening years a number of books, reports and papers have been published concerning the background, circumstances and cause of the crash. In 2011, the year of the fiftieth anniversary of the crash, Dr Susan Williams’ book Who Killed Hammarskjöld? was published. It offered no definite answer to its own question, but it marshalled a striking quantity of evidential material which had come to light in the intervening years.

In response to Dr Williams’ book, Lord Lea of Crondall assembled an international Enabling Committee which in 2012 set up the Hammarskjöld Inquiry Trust and invited Sir Stephen Sedley, a recently retired Lord Justice of Appeal for England and Wales, to chair a commission of jurists to inquire into the disaster. Justice Wilhelmina Thomassen of the Netherlands, Justice Richard Goldstone of South Africa and Ambassador Hans Corell of Sweden agreed to serve with Sir Stephen as Commissioners. All have worked without remuneration.

Previous inquiries

First inquiry

The first inquiry into the death of Dag Hammarskjöld was conducted by a Board of Investigation which was set up immediately after the crash by the Rhodesian Department of Civil Aviation. It concluded in its report in January 1962 that "the evidence available does not enable them to determine a specific or definite cause." It regarded pilot error as one of several probable causes. It considered the "wilful act of some person or persons unknown which might have forced the aircraft to descend or collide with the trees" to be unlikely but was unable to rule it out completely, "taking into consideration the extent of the destruction of the aircraft and the lack of survivor’s evidence." 75 to 80 per cent of the fuselage had been burnt.

Second inquiry

The second was the Rhodesian Commission of Inquiry, which held public hearings, and reported in February 1962. The Rhodesian Commission of Inquiry drew on the work of the Board of Investigation and identified pilot error as the cause of the crash, on the basis of elimination of the other suggested causes.

Third inquiry

The third inquiry was set up by the United Nations and reported in March 1962. This reached an open verdict and did not rule out sabotage or attack. The UN Commission noted that: "the Rhodesian inquiry, by eliminating to its satisfaction other possible causes, had reached the conclusion that the probable cause of the crash was pilot error. The [UN] Commission, while it cannot exclude this possibility, has found no indication that this was the probable cause of the crash." The UN report led to General Assembly resolution 1759 (XVII) of 26 October 1962, which requests the Secretary-General to inform the General Assembly of "any new evidence which may come to his attention."

Rösiö inquiry

In 1993 a small-scale inquiry was conducted by Ambassador Bengt Rösiö for the Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs. Rösiö concluded that the pilot made an error of judgement regarding altitude.[3]

Downloadable inquiry reports

Copies of the reports from the previous inquiries and General Assembly resolution 1759 (XVII) can be downloaded here[4]

Hammarskjöld Commission Report

The 61-page Hammarskjöld Commission Report was presented on 9 September 2013 (from 13.30pm to 15.00pm) in the Historical Reading Room of the Peace Palace at The Hague in the Netherlands. The presentation meeting was chaired by the director of the Carnegie Foundation Steven van Hoogstraten. The report was introduced by the Chairman of the Commission (Sir Stephen Sedley) and presented to the Chairman of the Hammarskjöld Inquiry Trust (Lord Lea of Crondall).

This was followed by a media Q & A session with all four members of the Commission, who were present at the meeting:

The Rt. Hon. Sir Stephen Sedley (Chairman)
Ambassador Hans Corell
Justice Richard Goldstone
Justice Wilhelmina Thomassen[5]

Conclusions

The report's conclusions at paragraph 15.1 stated:

We reiterate that the foregoing report, albeit detailed, contains no more than a selection from what is now a very large body of evidence, all of which we have considered in the course of our work.
Much of it has become known only in recent years, and it is still capable of being added to – indeed it has been augmented during the writing of this report.
This alone, without embarking on the limitations of the three original inquiries, answers the initial question:
does significant new evidence about Dag Hammarskjöld’s death exist?
Undoubtedly it does.[6]

UN reaction

In a press release on 9 September 2013, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said he would closely study the findings of an international commission linked to the death of Dag Hammarskjöld, the former United Nations chief killed in a 1961 plane crash.

A report released today by a Commission of Jurists reportedly suggests that new evidence has emerged showing that the plane may have been shot down en route to peace negotiations in what is now Zambia.

The Commission, comprised of high-profile international judges and diplomats, has reportedly urged the UN to reopen a probe into the September 1961 plane crash.

In a note to correspondents, Mr Ban’s spokesperson said the UN is among those most concerned in arriving at the whole truth of the circumstances leading to Mr Hammarskjöld’s death.

"The UN Secretariat will closely study the findings of the Commission’s report," the spokesperson noted, adding that Mr Ban thanked the Commission for their work and the Enabling Committee for its initiative in setting up the Commission.

Mr Hammarskjöld led the UN from 1953 until his death in 1961, when he perished with 15 others in a plane crash in what was then known as Northern Rhodesia – now Zambia – while en route to Ndola to negotiate a ceasefire.[7]

References