Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bilderberg/2020"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(question)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
"Christine Lagarde possible first public floater of the "great reset" (in 2014)" - [http://archive.today/2020.10.22-154151/https://sarahwestall.com/globalists-reveal-that-the-great-economic-reset-is-coming-in-2021/ Link1] - [http://archive.today/2021.02.21-014737/http://www.alt-market.com/articles/2758-the-global-economic-reset-has-begun Link2] - have listened to the one talk that he references, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgU5Nvi9k5g an hour or so it is], but cant make it out as what he says it is .. and yes, boring (like he says) marketing/PR talk. -- [[User:Sunvalley|Sunvalley]] ([[User talk:Sunvalley|talk]]) 01:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 
"Christine Lagarde possible first public floater of the "great reset" (in 2014)" - [http://archive.today/2020.10.22-154151/https://sarahwestall.com/globalists-reveal-that-the-great-economic-reset-is-coming-in-2021/ Link1] - [http://archive.today/2021.02.21-014737/http://www.alt-market.com/articles/2758-the-global-economic-reset-has-begun Link2] - have listened to the one talk that he references, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgU5Nvi9k5g an hour or so it is], but cant make it out as what he says it is .. and yes, boring (like he says) marketing/PR talk. -- [[User:Sunvalley|Sunvalley]] ([[User talk:Sunvalley|talk]]) 01:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 +
 +
:If it's not there (even in approximate form) then I suggest moving to a separate category, e.g. "rumoured but probably not". Various sites are suggesting she said it, so if they're wrong, it's worth clearly stating that. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 12:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:55, 21 February 2021

"Christine Lagarde possible first public floater of the "great reset" (in 2014)" - Link1 - Link2 - have listened to the one talk that he references, an hour or so it is, but cant make it out as what he says it is .. and yes, boring (like he says) marketing/PR talk. -- Sunvalley (talk) 01:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

If it's not there (even in approximate form) then I suggest moving to a separate category, e.g. "rumoured but probably not". Various sites are suggesting she said it, so if they're wrong, it's worth clearly stating that. -- Robin (talk) 12:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)