Difference between revisions of "Talk:Corporate media"
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Thanks to 'Toolbox' for starting this but I felt it need considerable expansion since the whole subject of the MSM is so central to propagation of 'the official narrative' that WikiSpooks seeks to expose as largely fraudulent. | Thanks to 'Toolbox' for starting this but I felt it need considerable expansion since the whole subject of the MSM is so central to propagation of 'the official narrative' that WikiSpooks seeks to expose as largely fraudulent. | ||
| − | I have saved the sources bit of the original article. I feel it is more appropriate to include it in a Project page - possibly 'editorial policy' - to outline WikiSpooks official policy on information sourcing and referencing. It can then be linked to as appropriate. The policy | + | I have saved the sources bit of the original article. I feel it is more appropriate to include it in a Project page - possibly 'editorial policy' - to outline WikiSpooks official policy on information sourcing and referencing. It can then be linked to as appropriate. The policy - simply put and like Wikipedia - is to try to source and reference all statements of fact. It is on what constitutes a credible or 'Notable' source that WikiSpooks necessarily differs. I'll get around to doing it - or at least starting it asap. |
--[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 08:40, 17 July 2010 (IST) | --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 08:40, 17 July 2010 (IST) | ||
Revision as of 07:57, 17 July 2010
Toolbox - original page
Thanks to 'Toolbox' for starting this but I felt it need considerable expansion since the whole subject of the MSM is so central to propagation of 'the official narrative' that WikiSpooks seeks to expose as largely fraudulent.
I have saved the sources bit of the original article. I feel it is more appropriate to include it in a Project page - possibly 'editorial policy' - to outline WikiSpooks official policy on information sourcing and referencing. It can then be linked to as appropriate. The policy - simply put and like Wikipedia - is to try to source and reference all statements of fact. It is on what constitutes a credible or 'Notable' source that WikiSpooks necessarily differs. I'll get around to doing it - or at least starting it asap.
--Peter P 08:40, 17 July 2010 (IST)
