Difference between revisions of "Template talk:SMWQ"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(question) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Ref number confusion=== | ===Ref number confusion=== | ||
* <s>When more than one invocations occur on a page without the {{t|ref_name}} param, this does not number references correctly.</s> - Fixed -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 12:20, 8 December 2017 (GMT) | * <s>When more than one invocations occur on a page without the {{t|ref_name}} param, this does not number references correctly.</s> - Fixed -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 12:20, 8 December 2017 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Text format== | ||
| + | I'm looking for the option to create a quote that looks like regular text. I think I saw this somewhere, but not sure, can't find it now. Should: "|format = inline, inline_italics, inline_bold" create this? If not, what are they for (?), don't see a difference when trying it, seems all to look like the standard QB. -- [[User:Sunvalley|Sunvalley]] ([[User talk:Sunvalley|talk]]) 20:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:12, 2 October 2022
Bugs
- There's an issue evident in Ziad Abdelnour that I can't fix --Peter P (talk) 13:51, 21 September 2016 (IST)
Ref number confusion
When more than one invocations occur on a page without the ref_name param, this does not number references correctly.- Fixed -- Robin (talk) 12:20, 8 December 2017 (GMT)
Text format
I'm looking for the option to create a quote that looks like regular text. I think I saw this somewhere, but not sure, can't find it now. Should: "|format = inline, inline_italics, inline_bold" create this? If not, what are they for (?), don't see a difference when trying it, seems all to look like the standard QB. -- Sunvalley (talk) 20:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
