Difference between revisions of "File:Living under drones.pdf"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
paper by International Conflict Resolution Clinic dated September 2012
Subjects: drones, targeted killings
Source: Stanford Law School (Link)
From the Stanford Law School & Global Justice Clinic, NYU Law School
See Also
m (Text replacement - "|SourceURL" to "|sourceURL") |
m (Text replacement - "{{FileProv" to "{{Document") |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Document |
| − | | | + | |source_URL=http://livingunderdrones.org/ |
| − | | | + | |source_name=Stanford Law School |
| − | | | + | |subjects=drones, targeted killings |
| − | | | + | |type=paper |
| − | | | + | |authors=International Conflict Resolution Clinic |
| + | |note=From the Stanford Law School & Global Justice Clinic, NYU Law School | ||
| + | |publication_date=September 2012 | ||
| + | |see_also=* Video [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yMOzvmgVhc Living Under Drones] | ||
* [http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/25/study-obama-drone-deaths UK Guardian article] by Glenn Greenwald, 25 September 2012 | * [http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/25/study-obama-drone-deaths UK Guardian article] by Glenn Greenwald, 25 September 2012 | ||
| − | | | + | |title=Living Under Drones |
}} | }} | ||
===Death,Injury, and Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Practices in Pakistan=== | ===Death,Injury, and Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Practices in Pakistan=== | ||
====From Executive Summary....==== | ====From Executive Summary....==== | ||
| − | In the United States, the dominant narrative about the use of | + | In the [[United States]], the dominant narrative about the use of [[drone]]s in [[Pakistan]] is of a surgically precise and effective tool that makes the US safer by enabling “[[targeted killing]]” of terrorists, with minimal downsides or collateral impacts. <ref>The US publicly describes its drone program in terms of its unprecedented ability to “distinguish ... effectively between an [[al Qaeda]] [[terrorist]] and innocent civilians,” and touts its missile-armed drones as capable of conducting strikes with “astonishing” and “surgical” precision. See, e.g., [[John O. Brennan]], [[Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism]], The Efficacy and Ethics of U.S. Counterterrorism Strategy, Remarks at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (Apr. 30, 2012), available at http://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/the-efficacy-and-ethics-us-counterterrorismstrategy . </ref> |
'''This narrative is false.''' | '''This narrative is false.''' | ||
| − | Following nine months of intensive research—including two investigations in Pakistan, more than 130 interviews with victims, witnesses, and experts, and review of thousands of pages of documentation and media reporting—this report presents evidence of the damaging and counterproductive effects of current US drone strike policies. Based on extensive interviews with Pakistanis living in the regions directly affected, as well as humanitarian and medical workers, this report provides new and firsthand testimony about the negative impacts US policies are having on the civilians living under drones. Real threats to US security and to Pakistani civilians exist in the Pakistani border areas now targeted by drones. It is crucial that the US be able to protect itself from terrorist threats, and that the great harm caused by terrorists to Pakistani civilians be addressed. However, in light of significant evidence of harmful impacts to Pakistani civilians and to US interests, current policies to address terrorism through targeted killings and drone strikes must be carefully re-evaluated. | + | Following nine months of intensive research—including two investigations in Pakistan, more than 130 interviews with victims, witnesses, and experts, and review of thousands of pages of documentation and media reporting—this report presents evidence of the damaging and counterproductive effects of current US drone strike policies. Based on extensive interviews with Pakistanis living in the regions directly affected, as well as humanitarian and medical workers, this report provides new and firsthand testimony about the negative impacts US policies are having on the civilians living under drones. Real threats to [[US security]] and to Pakistani civilians exist in the Pakistani border areas now targeted by drones. It is crucial that the US be able to protect itself from terrorist threats, and that the great harm caused by terrorists to Pakistani civilians be addressed. However, in light of significant evidence of harmful impacts to Pakistani civilians and to US interests, current policies to address terrorism through targeted killings and drone strikes must be carefully re-evaluated. |
It is essential that public debate about US policies take the negative effects of current policies into account. | It is essential that public debate about US policies take the negative effects of current policies into account. | ||
| − | == | + | ==References== |
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 23:16, 24 July 2016
paper by International Conflict Resolution Clinic dated September 2012Subjects: drones, targeted killings
Source: Stanford Law School (Link)
From the Stanford Law School & Global Justice Clinic, NYU Law School
See Also
- Video Living Under Drones
- UK Guardian article by Glenn Greenwald, 25 September 2012
★ Start a Discussion about this document
Living Under Drones
Death,Injury, and Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Practices in Pakistan
From Executive Summary....
In the United States, the dominant narrative about the use of drones in Pakistan is of a surgically precise and effective tool that makes the US safer by enabling “targeted killing” of terrorists, with minimal downsides or collateral impacts. [1]
This narrative is false.
Following nine months of intensive research—including two investigations in Pakistan, more than 130 interviews with victims, witnesses, and experts, and review of thousands of pages of documentation and media reporting—this report presents evidence of the damaging and counterproductive effects of current US drone strike policies. Based on extensive interviews with Pakistanis living in the regions directly affected, as well as humanitarian and medical workers, this report provides new and firsthand testimony about the negative impacts US policies are having on the civilians living under drones. Real threats to US security and to Pakistani civilians exist in the Pakistani border areas now targeted by drones. It is crucial that the US be able to protect itself from terrorist threats, and that the great harm caused by terrorists to Pakistani civilians be addressed. However, in light of significant evidence of harmful impacts to Pakistani civilians and to US interests, current policies to address terrorism through targeted killings and drone strikes must be carefully re-evaluated.
It is essential that public debate about US policies take the negative effects of current policies into account.
References
- ↑ The US publicly describes its drone program in terms of its unprecedented ability to “distinguish ... effectively between an al Qaeda terrorist and innocent civilians,” and touts its missile-armed drones as capable of conducting strikes with “astonishing” and “surgical” precision. See, e.g., John O. Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, The Efficacy and Ethics of U.S. Counterterrorism Strategy, Remarks at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (Apr. 30, 2012), available at http://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/the-efficacy-and-ethics-us-counterterrorismstrategy .
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 18:33, 25 September 2012 | (1.57 MB) | Peter (talk | contribs) | Category:Doc Category:Terrorism |
- You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
The following page uses this file:
