Difference between revisions of "Richard Dawkins"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(opinions)
(himself abused)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 43: Line 43:
 
{{QB|If there are issues on which the populace at large should be trusted to vote, something as complicated and economically sophisticated as [[EU]] membership is definitely not one of them.<ref>https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/richard-dawkins-eu-referendum-brexit-david-cameron-a7059201.html</ref>}}
 
{{QB|If there are issues on which the populace at large should be trusted to vote, something as complicated and economically sophisticated as [[EU]] membership is definitely not one of them.<ref>https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/richard-dawkins-eu-referendum-brexit-david-cameron-a7059201.html</ref>}}
  
===Eugenics for pigs===
+
===Eugenics===
 
Soon hedging by saying it was only possible, not desirable<ref>https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2020/02/16/dawkins-makes-a-tweet/</ref>, he wrote:
 
Soon hedging by saying it was only possible, not desirable<ref>https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2020/02/16/dawkins-makes-a-tweet/</ref>, he wrote:
 
{{QB|It’s one thing to deplore [[eugenics]] on ideological, political, moral grounds. It’s quite another to conclude that it wouldn’t work in practice. Of course it would. It works for [[cows]], [[horses]], [[pigs]], [[dogs]] & roses. Why on earth wouldn’t it work for [[humans]]? [[Facts]] ignore [[ideology]].<ref>https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/1228943686953664512?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw</ref>}}
 
{{QB|It’s one thing to deplore [[eugenics]] on ideological, political, moral grounds. It’s quite another to conclude that it wouldn’t work in practice. Of course it would. It works for [[cows]], [[horses]], [[pigs]], [[dogs]] & roses. Why on earth wouldn’t it work for [[humans]]? [[Facts]] ignore [[ideology]].<ref>https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/1228943686953664512?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw</ref>}}
 
===Overpoulation===
 
Dawkins is a rare case. On the one hand he never mentions Malthus once, in any of his books1. On the other hand, Dawkins is one of the best exponents of the mathematical Principle Of Population explained by Malthus between 1798 and 1830.
 
  
 
===Overcoming taboos===
 
===Overcoming taboos===
 
{{QB|What if [[synthetic meat|human meat is grown]]? Could we overcome our [[taboo]] against [[cannibalism]]? An interesting test case for consequentialist morality versus "yuck reaction" absolutism.<ref>https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/969939225180364805</ref>}}
 
{{QB|What if [[synthetic meat|human meat is grown]]? Could we overcome our [[taboo]] against [[cannibalism]]? An interesting test case for consequentialist morality versus "yuck reaction" absolutism.<ref>https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/969939225180364805</ref>}}
  
 +
==="Mild pedophilia"===
 +
{{YouTubeVideo
 +
|code=c1iSxEtgEGs
 +
|align=left
 +
|caption=
 +
}}
 +
 +
Dawkins has repeatedly defended "mild pedophilia", as what happened to himself when he was molested by a teacher at [[Chafyn Grove School]]<ref>https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/09/richard-dawkins-defends-mild-pedophilia-again-and-again/311230/</ref>.
  
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 06:18, 12 April 2024

Person.png Richard Dawkins   Twitter WebsiteRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
(biologist, author)
Dawkins aaconf.jpg
Born26 March 1941
Nairobi, British Kenya
NationalityUK
Alma materChafyn Grove School, Oundle School, Balliol College (Oxford)
Interestsatheism

Richard Dawkins is a British evolutionary biologist and popular science writer. Most known for his forceful argument for atheism and his dogmatic views on science and expert rule[1], he is given plenty of attention from corporate media and billionaires like Bill Gates[2].

He is an emeritus fellow of New College, Oxford, and was Professor for Public Understanding of Science in the University of Oxford from 1995 to 2008.

Opinions

Miracle jabs

In August 2021, he mused:

Ingenious scientists worked around the clock to find vaccines, with spectacular success. Will their noble efforts to beat the virus be defeated because of a new epidemic – new virus, a virus of the mind, the memetic virus of anti-vax propaganda spread by gullible fools?[3]

Democracy

In 2016, he thought that Brexit should never have been decided by a vote:

If there are issues on which the populace at large should be trusted to vote, something as complicated and economically sophisticated as EU membership is definitely not one of them.[4]

Eugenics

Soon hedging by saying it was only possible, not desirable[5], he wrote:

It’s one thing to deplore eugenics on ideological, political, moral grounds. It’s quite another to conclude that it wouldn’t work in practice. Of course it would. It works for cows, horses, pigs, dogs & roses. Why on earth wouldn’t it work for humans? Facts ignore ideology.[6]

Overcoming taboos

What if human meat is grown? Could we overcome our taboo against cannibalism? An interesting test case for consequentialist morality versus "yuck reaction" absolutism.[7]

"Mild pedophilia"

Dawkins has repeatedly defended "mild pedophilia", as what happened to himself when he was molested by a teacher at Chafyn Grove School[8].


Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References