9-11/Air Defence

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Event.png 9-11/Air Defence  Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
9-11 Air Defence.jpg
PerpetratorsNEADS, US Military
Description46 mock hijack exercises were ongoing on the morning of September 11th and planes were unavailable, contributing to an unprecedented failure. Norman Mineta's testimony to the 9/11 Commission (simply ignored in their final report), implying a direct stand down order, would seem to explain the total failure of air defence around the Pentagon. Although standard operating procedure was not followed, those responsible were promoted rather than disciplined after the event.

US airspace defence on 9-11 was effectively stood down by a combination of drills, procedure changes and absenteeism.

Simultaneous Exercises

Full article: 9-11/Drills

As Michael Ruppert and Webster Tarpley have documented, on the day of 9/11, multiple exercises were ongoing on September 11, 2001,[1] perhaps more than on any day before or since, including Operation Northern Vigilance, Operation Vigilant Guardian, Operation Northern guardian' and Operation Vigilant Warrior. Some of which involved the simulated hijacking of airliners, some of which involved the flying of many fighter aircraft far away from their normal locations on the East Coast of US.[2]

Change of Procedure

The procedure for interception of off-course airliners was changed (by whom?) in the run up to 9/11 to require personal authorisation (from Cheney?).

Mineta's Testimony

Norman Mineta's testimony to the 9/11 Commission is well worth a listen, especially as regards the total lack of air defence around the Pentagon.


Related Document

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Norad-911-Jochen Scholzinterview30 January 2011Jochen ScholzPart of the NuoViso interview with Lieutenant-Colonel Jochen Scholz of the German air force on the war on terror.