User:JasonCarswell/User:JasonCarswell 2016-12-14

From Wikispooks
< User:JasonCarswell
Revision as of 12:58, 31 December 2019 by JasonCarswell (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{| class="wikitable" |- ! Welcome to ''Jason Carswell'''s User Spaces on: |- |{{colbegin}} * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JasonCarswell Wikipedia] * [http://commons.wiki...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Jason Carswell's User Spaces on:

My WikiSpooks Articles

  • James Corbett (journalist)
    The above article is for WikiSpooks to expand upon and modify as they see fit. There is already a James Corbett article. Obviously the two need merging into a "WikiSpooks format", as necessary, or you may delete that article if there is nothing of value. Naturally I understand that WikiSpooks articles are designed differently than Wikipedia, in the same way that RationalWiki articles are also different. Unfortunately, at present, I'm only familiar with Wikipedia - though not enough to avoid censorship (and be banned from editing US political article for a year).
    I drafted the article for Wikipedia who censored it in May 2016 and wants to delete it in Nov-Dec 2016. I copied it here and to RationalWiki (linked above) and below for archival purposes, if that's okay. (RationalWiki modified my seed article into what's more appropriate for their website, and even though it's not what I would say, it's pretty good though lacking in some respects.) Also on my RationalWiki page is a fuller account with links about the Wikipedia censorship drama.
    Please leave me a message on my talk page if you care to discuss.
  • Lionel (radio personality)
    The above article is for WikiSpooks to expand upon and modify as they see fit. Naturally I understand that WikiSpooks articles are designed differently than Wikipedia, in the same way that RationalWiki articles are also different. Unfortunately, at present, I'm only familiar with Wikipedia - though not enough to avoid censorship (and be banned from editing US political article for a year).
    I contributed to the article for Wikipedia who brutally censored it down to almost nothing in Dec 2016. I copied it here and to RationalWiki (linked above) and below for archival purposes, if that's okay. Also on my RationalWiki page is a fuller account with links about the Wikipedia censorship drama. User Ian.thomson is bulldozing my Wikipedia contributions and taking out others' work as well.
    Please leave me a message on my talk page if you care to discuss.

My WikiSpooks Goals

  1. Network and contribute if I can, which may be extremely limited as far as original content goes, but I may be good for discussion, minor corrective edits, presentation, etc.
  2. Offer my free services as an illustrator/animator to which I may accept tasks that I will work on without deadlines. (Donations are always VERY welcome but far from prime motivation.) I also have some ideas (see below) for educational graphics and projects.
  3. If it doesn't already exist, develop a cross-over community between WikiSpooks and Wikipedia users.
Like much of the world, I use Wikipedia ALL the time. I've been an armchair slactivist 9/11 Truther since around 2004 or 2005 and skeptic of the deep state, but only recently became aware of how much deeper the rabbit hole goes with only cursory glimpses of insights into skepticism about Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, and the Holocaust. It's all a fraud! Then, by chance, I went to Wikipedia either to look something up or add a tidbit and was SHOCKED at how utterly muted and dismal the counter-narratives are. They don't even present contexts or authentic sentiments of skeptics - which are easily expressed and understood all over YouTube and elsewhere. Like all media, it will clearly be infiltrated and controlled in the name of "neutrality" which is far from neutral when it omits far too much. I actively jumped in and discovered a few things - they have great defense, I need to learn how to find and cite sources well, and there is a whole culture and wikilease to comprehend.
I believe Wikipedia, being the world's main reference, with a modicum of openness in their hierarchy needs proper support for the revolution of the mind to succeed against the war on reality.
The more crazy WP gets, the more sane WS will seem.

~ JasonCarswell (talk) August 2016

My Dis-Beliefs

I am an existentialist atheist Truther social libertarian (aka, anarcho-syndicalist = Marxism + voluntaryism/agorism) in Canada.

Animation, Design, Art Direction, Directing

I used to do hi-end computer animation and other creative work from 1991-2009 and I was good, occasionally great, but never as consistently awesome as I wanted - as in life.

My Mental "Illness"

My family tree is primarily made up of teachers, doctors, and artists often crossing between and beyond. Like many relatives, my rationality and intelligence remain excellent but I have mood and attention disorders, so severe in my case that I am irregular and unreliable thereby unemployable despite my talents and intelligence in this capitalist society of deadlines demanding profit. I was further disabled by hack shrinks and big pharma experimenting with unscientific methods and cross-prescriptions for almost 5 years. I quit their shit and have been slowly trying to crawl out of that hole for the last few years. I still have ups and long downs, like a bad swimmer. I've found that basically I only needed vitamin D. My moods are still too strong. I often over react, step back, critically reexamine, then either admit my wrongs or defend my stance with a better head having calmed down after the shock of conflict. Not ideal, but it's they way I am.

Revolution?

I'd call for revolution, especially a revolution of the mind, but I can't as a nobody, and besides, I think and hope it's already snowballing in slow motion - centrifugally in both directions - police state vs the awakening. It will get worse before it gets better - IF it can get better. Peaceful activism is great but Derrick Jensen might be right that it's not enough against tyrants, especially when they have the monopoly on violence and not afraid to use it. I am not a "terrorist" but have sympathy for those that fight back if their lives have been destroyed by empire, but no sympathy for those who fight for religion. Also, I do not recognize honor or glory in military actions or persons, especially those who just follow orders. While I neither condone nor condemn violence against authority and their fear and violence monopoly, I am a pacifist (on the morally higher and evolved grounds of compassion and cooperation to greater ends) and will never participate in any plots towards violence, especially online, duh. (So entrapment agents can F-off.) Maybe I don't need to say that, but you never know. I may have said shit a decade ago like, "I'd suicide bomb G.W.B. only IF it would help, but I'd never be able to get close." Impossibly inaccessible. But now I see it would never change a thing. Even if a leader were taken out, hundreds are eager to perpetuate the policies. The obvious only way to make ANY difference in the hallucinatory state of democratic illusion is to get truth, transparency, proper context, and awareness to the people.

Educational Graphics

Sometimes a great image is worth more than all the words in the world.
Before I put my illustration and animation skills to work I'd like to share my ideas for feedback, improvement, and refining. These are just the ideas that come to mind today. Feel free to illustrate them before I get to them. More will come soon.

  1. JFK's Zapruder film has been stabilized. If I'm not mistaken, there's another film from across the plaza that shows part(s) of the event that could be stabilized. Stabilization simply makes it easier to watch, but is not necessary for the following rotoscoping experiment (that can be copyleft open-source developed and publicly published and accessible). Over a 3D CG model of the plaza with precise measurements, the two films can each have vehicles and civilians rotoscoped as accurately as possible from their perspective with elements in different colors. If either film was tampered with it should be self evident when the 3D elements do not match. Mis-matches can be colored to highlight. A final video would show 5 cycling panels, the 2 originals looping, the 2 rotoscoped angles with 50% transparency looping, and one 3D view with various angles and fly-throughs of the scene.
  2. I'm astounded that there are no creative illustrations of how the WTC towers "should" or might have collapsed that demonstrate various physical limitations. (I won't even mention WTC7.) For example: If the pancake theory were to be believed, then the tube within a tube structure would remain and/or be exposed. If it were like a jenga tower there would be a pile at the bottom rather than a hole, and the toughest central columns would would jut up through the middle of the pile with significant recognizable portions of the top floors and rooftop on top of the pile, last to fall. If it were a failure it would be asymmetrical, give somewhere first, fall to that side, and fall outside it's footprint if not onto another building.
  3. Lastly, for now, (credit to YouTube videoID# vKJGsCPrdfw 'Professor David Ray Griffin, 9-11 Miracles, 2011' (2014-01-15) {Academic Freedom Conference 9-11, JFK and the Holocaust} @ 28 minutes), I'd like to illustrate through animation, a highway traffic jam with equally spaced out cars with a truck at the back labelled gravity. Within the gravity truck an umbrella is jammed on the accelerator. The truck speeds up but then collides with the car in front, slowing it down, then they both accelerate, then hit the next car and slow down, etc. Now, do another "cartoony" version without slowing down for collisions. Then tip the two scenes on their sides beside the "collapsing" buildings to illustrate how silly it is.

Bittersweet Seeds

I'm not sure if this is a good place to develop this project or not, but I don't think it could hurt. It may be good promotion for WikiSpooks if it ever amounts to anything.
Bittersweet Seeds is a long term personal project I've been working on for about 15 years. It is too epic to explain in any detail right now. I hope my efforts and involvement with WikiSpooks and other groups may earn knowledge, feedback, collaborators, resources, etc., and attention, not to me (ideally I would prefer to be anonymous), but to the profoundly important and urgent issues being ignored.

  1. Bittersweet Seeds: The Documentary, is basically about mass hypnosis, rhyming histories, the deep state, the truther dilemma, solutions, and The Pitch movie-short/trailer. The documentary will cover much rapidly without depth but with contextual analysis and summarize a strong stance.
    • The documentary is VERY different than the movie, but the documentary of the way things ARE now is the foundation of where we WILL end up.
    • The documentary and feature will be complimentary, ideally inviting crossover audiences, yet stand perfectly alone.
    • The documentary is not fiction but may also be entertaining. The feature is cautionary fiction and intends to be didactic (in a good way) edutainment.
    • The documentary will take on the "preachy" content away from the "feature" and clears me of trying to over pack two already epic concepts into one.
    • The documentary will not be easy, but it will lay the ideological foundation and launch pad to promote the concept for a profound feature that may reach millions.
  2. Bittersweet Seeds: The Trailer, will likely be a simply animated feature film trailer for a film that does not exist yet. It will entice with many of the concepts and characters I've been developing. It would be the conclusion of the documentary as a sort of covert commercial to raise awareness and funding, but appropriately revolutionary in content and attitude with content taboo in corporate Hollywood.
  3. Bittersweet Seeds: The Pitch, is a pre-production explanation extended beyond the trailer, leading to The Board-o-matic.
  4. Bittersweet Seeds: The Board-o-matic, is a lengthy pre-production illustrative walk through tour of rough storyboards and concepts.
  5. Bittersweet Seeds: The Feature Film, a Kubrick-esque cautionary tale in 3 sections, set around 2050 but very much like today, with some things better, some much worse, and everything more extreme. This movie will entertain but challenge and raise far more questions than it answers.

Life is not good, life is not a bitch, truly life is bittersweet.

Sorry this got so long.

Scratch Pad (Temporary Holding Zone To Sort, Sooner Or Later)

Articles To Suggest Or Start

Retrieved from "https://wikispooks.com/w/index.php?title=User:JasonCarswell/User:JasonCarswell_2016-12-14&oldid=177422"