9-11/Censorship
 9-11/Censorship  (censorship)   | |
|---|---|
| 250px | |
| A range of tactics have been employed to try to stifle dissent about 9/11, from ad hominem attacks to assassination. As of 2015, censorship is ongoing. |
Contents
Corporate Media
- Full article: 9-11/WTC7/Collapse/Censorship
- Full article: 9-11/WTC7/Collapse/Censorship
The commercially-controlled media has been more or less united in repeating a simple script linking Osama Bin Laden to the 9-11 attacks, often repeating video of planes hitting the WTC towers with an image of Bin Laden in the corner. The more surprising (although apparently non unexpected[1]) collapse of WTC7 was not reported on after the day for several years. In 2015, the establishment harsh criticised a UK vicar who linked to this Wikispooks page which casts doubt on the US government's official narrative.
Psychiatric profession
In 2006 Clare Swinney brought a complaint to the New Zealand Broadcasting Standards Authority in connection to TVNZ's unsubstantiated claim that Osama bin Laden was behind the 9/11 attacks. Shortly afterwards, she was threatened, incarcerated in a psychiatric ward and subjected to compulsory treatment. The head psychiatrist told a judge that in light of she should remain in hospital as her belief that 9/11 was an inside job was evidence she was "delusional". The judge concurred. The NZ establishment apologised to her in 2008.[2]
Premature Deaths
- Full article:
9-11/Premature death
- Full article:
Many key witnesses to 9/11 have been reported dead in unexplained circumstances (see for example, Barry Jennings). Others have supposedly committed suicide or died as a result of freak accidents. Mark Gorton states that .Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag;
refs with no name must have content
Internet Censorship
- Full article:
Internet/Censorship
- Full article:
Reports indicate that the efforts are being made to try to lessen the visibility of 9/11 dissent from the internet. If true, this would provide valuable information about the identity of the perpetrators.[3]
An example
| Page name | Description |
|---|---|
| 9-11/WTC7/Destruction/Censorship | A very telling omission by the corporate media, lasting for several years, that totally suppressed mention of the complete (forewarned) collapse of WTC7. Note that the 911 originally neglected to give an account of this unprecedented event. |
Related Quotation
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project Censored | “We’ve never had an op-ed piece that we were contracted to do rejected, outright rejected, and it wasn’t just rejected because of some contractual issue or violation. We were actually told specifically from people at IPS that it was because we mentioned 9/11 as part of a piece on state crimes against democracy.
What we’re suggesting is that the events of September 11th have all the trappings of a potential state crime against democracy. So we mentioned the scientific studies done by Stephen Jones and the open chemical physics journal, and we included Richard Gage and the Architects and Engineers group, 1200 experts now saying that the official science just doesn’t make sense and just doesn’t add up, I mean it defies everything we know about scientific methodology and so forth. They literally told us that they were not going to publish anything that talked about 9/11.” | Mickey Huff | 2 October 2010 |
Related Documents
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:911 and the Orwellian Redefinition of Conspiracy Theory | article | 20 June 2011 | Paul Craig Roberts | "While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone Orwellian redefinition..." A "conspiracy theory" now refers to any ideas or facts that are out of step with the official narrative as put forward by government and the commercially controlled media. |
| Document:Craig Murray and 9-11 | article | 30 January 2010 | Peter | A reply to Craig Murray's article explaining his embargo on any further discussion of 9-11 in the comments section of his blog |
