Difference between revisions of "Daily Express"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added: start, website.)
(Poynter Institute List)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|constitutes=newspaper
 
|constitutes=newspaper
 
|type=newspaper
 
|type=newspaper
|description=A UK newspaper
+
|image=Shoot_all_bombers.jpg
 +
|image_width=444px
 +
|image_caption=The cover of the ''Daily Express'' responded to the [[2005 London bombings]] with a lot of [[enemy images]]. The "[[terrorist]]" referred to on this page was [[Jean Charles de Menezes]], an unarmed man whom the [[Metropolitan Police]] had shot and killed the day before.
 +
|description=A UK newspaper which in 2016 questioned the destruction of [[WTC7]].
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Express
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Express
 +
|spartacus=http://spartacus-educational.com/Jexpress.htm
 +
|founders=Arthur Pearson
 
|start=24 April 1900
 
|start=24 April 1900
 
|website=http://express.co.uk
 
|website=http://express.co.uk
 +
|powerbase=http://www.powerbase.info/index.php/Daily_Express
 +
|sourcewatch=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Daily_Express
 
}}
 
}}
 +
The '''''Daily Express''''' is a UK daily [[newspaper]] which began in 1900. Although generally supportive of {{on}}s, in 2016 it questioned the story of the [[destruction of WTC7]]. In was included on the [[Poynter Institute List]] of "untrustworthy" news sources.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20190501173436/https://www.poynter.org/ifcn/unreliable-news-index/#methodology</ref>
 +
 +
==Reporting==
 +
 +
===September 11, 2001 dissidence===
 +
[[image:2016de911.png|360px|left]]
 +
On June 22, 2016 the ''Express'' became the first UK corporate newspaper to deviate from the [[9-11/Official narrative]] when it headlined a story "Were 9/11 towers blown up by bombs? University probes if planes REALLY were responsible". The story centered on the [[University of Alaska]]'s sponsoring "a full investigation into claims that World Trade Center Building 7 was brought down by a controlled demolition during the 9/11 attacks".<ref>http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/682256/Were-9-11-towers-blown-up-by-bombs-University-probes-if-planes-REALLY-were-responsible</ref> On September 10th, 2016, [[John Austin]] published a second article entitled "Was 9/11 an inside job? Call for TRUTH over Building 7 collapse on eve of 15th anniversary" which conceded that "growing numbers of people STILL claim the Twin Towers atrocities could have been an inside job."<ref>http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/709000/Was-9-11-an-inside-job-Call-for-TRUTH-over-Building-7-collapse-on-eve-of-15th-anniversary</ref>
 +
 +
===2005 London bombings===
 +
The ''Daily Express'' was unquestioning in its promotion of the {{on}} that the attacks were carried out by "[[Muslim terrorists]]" with no assistance from Western [[intelligence agencies]].
 +
 +
===2018 Russophobia===
 +
With reference to [[Victor Madeira]], the Express headlined a December 2017 article ''Russia has MORE sleeper agents in UK now than during the Cold War, expert warns MPs''.<ref>https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/890394/russia-vladimir-putin-donald-trump-us-sleeper-agents-cold-war-parliament-victor-madeira</ref>
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 +
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
{{Stub}}
 

Latest revision as of 02:51, 5 May 2019

Publication.png Daily Express 
(newspaperPowerbase Sourcewatch SpartacusRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Shoot all bombers.jpg
The cover of the Daily Express responded to the 2005 London bombings with a lot of enemy images. The "terrorist" referred to on this page was Jean Charles de Menezes, an unarmed man whom the Metropolitan Police had shot and killed the day before.
Typenewspaper
Founder(s)Arthur Pearson
Founded24 April 1900
Author(s)Unknown
A UK newspaper which in 2016 questioned the destruction of WTC7.

The Daily Express is a UK daily newspaper which began in 1900. Although generally supportive of official narratives, in 2016 it questioned the story of the destruction of WTC7. In was included on the Poynter Institute List of "untrustworthy" news sources.[1]

Reporting

September 11, 2001 dissidence

2016de911.png

On June 22, 2016 the Express became the first UK corporate newspaper to deviate from the 9-11/Official narrative when it headlined a story "Were 9/11 towers blown up by bombs? University probes if planes REALLY were responsible". The story centered on the University of Alaska's sponsoring "a full investigation into claims that World Trade Center Building 7 was brought down by a controlled demolition during the 9/11 attacks".[2] On September 10th, 2016, John Austin published a second article entitled "Was 9/11 an inside job? Call for TRUTH over Building 7 collapse on eve of 15th anniversary" which conceded that "growing numbers of people STILL claim the Twin Towers atrocities could have been an inside job."[3]

2005 London bombings

The Daily Express was unquestioning in its promotion of the official narrative that the attacks were carried out by "Muslim terrorists" with no assistance from Western intelligence agencies.

2018 Russophobia

With reference to Victor Madeira, the Express headlined a December 2017 article Russia has MORE sleeper agents in UK now than during the Cold War, expert warns MPs.[4]

 

A document sourced from Daily Express

TitleTypeSubject(s)Publication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Absolute folly for Britain to get involved in SyriaArticleNATO
Russia
Syria
UK
1 March 2018Leo McKinstryTory MP Johnny Mercer, a former soldier, has demanded: “Britain must come to Syria’s aid” and condemned those who oppose “military intervention”.


References