Difference between revisions of "Freedom of speech"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{concept |wikipedia=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech }} Concepts of freedom of speech can be found in early human rights documents.<ref name="guardiantimeline">...")
 
(larger image)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
==Official Narrative==
 
==Official Narrative==
 
Article 19 of the [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]], adopted in 1948 and recognized in [[international human rights law]] in the [[International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights]] (ICCPR) states that ''"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."'' Article 19 additionally states that the exercise of these rights carries ''"special duties and responsibilities... [and may] therefore be subject to certain restrictions... [when necessary] [f]or respect of the rights or reputation of others... [or] [f]or the protection of national security or of public order, or of public health or morals"''.<ref>{{cite news|title=Article 19|url=http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/ccpr.htm |work=International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights|publisher= Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights; adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by UN General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, entry into force 23 March 1976|date=23 March 1976|accessdate=13 March 2014}}</ref>
 
Article 19 of the [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]], adopted in 1948 and recognized in [[international human rights law]] in the [[International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights]] (ICCPR) states that ''"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."'' Article 19 additionally states that the exercise of these rights carries ''"special duties and responsibilities... [and may] therefore be subject to certain restrictions... [when necessary] [f]or respect of the rights or reputation of others... [or] [f]or the protection of national security or of public order, or of public health or morals"''.<ref>{{cite news|title=Article 19|url=http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/ccpr.htm |work=International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights|publisher= Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights; adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by UN General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, entry into force 23 March 1976|date=23 March 1976|accessdate=13 March 2014}}</ref>
[[image:charlie-hebdo-covers.jpg|left|540px|thumbnail|'''Left (legal)''', a Charlie Hebdo cover of July 2013, released after Egyptian protestors were killed after the military coup.<br/>'''Right (''illegal'' "defense of [[terrorism]]")''' posted on the net after the [[Charlie Hebdo shooting]].<ref name="irony"/>]]
+
[[image:charlie-hebdo-covers.jpg|left|590px|thumbnail|'''Left ''(legal "free speech)''''', a Charlie Hebdo cover of July 2013, released after Egyptian protestors were killed after the military coup.<br/>'''Right ''(illegal "defense of [[terrorism]]")''''' posted on the net after the [[Charlie Hebdo shooting]].<ref name="irony"/>]]
  
 
===Problems===
 
===Problems===

Revision as of 14:52, 19 February 2015

Concept.png Freedom of speech Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png 4
Interest of• 'Anonymous'
• Big Brother Watch
• BitChute
• Brandnewtube
• Silkie Carlo
• Iain Davis
• Jack Dorsey
• Gettr
• Barbara Kulaszka
• Jacob Mchangama
• Minds
• Odysee
• Rumble
• James Tracy
• Kurt Westergaard
• WinterWatch

Concepts of freedom of speech can be found in early human rights documents.[1] England’s Bill of Rights 1689 legally established the constitutional right of 'freedom of speech in Parliament' which is still in effect.[2]

Official Narrative

Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948 and recognized in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) states that "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers." Article 19 additionally states that the exercise of these rights carries "special duties and responsibilities... [and may] therefore be subject to certain restrictions... [when necessary] [f]or respect of the rights or reputation of others... [or] [f]or the protection of national security or of public order, or of public health or morals".[3]

Left (legal "free speech), a Charlie Hebdo cover of July 2013, released after Egyptian protestors were killed after the military coup.
Right (illegal "defense of terrorism") posted on the net after the Charlie Hebdo shooting.[4]

Problems

The commercially-controlled media is highly partisan in its application of "Freedom of speech", as its control by the deep state might suggest. It is used to spread incitements to murder. It also unquestioningly echoed establishment allegations that at least one page on this website was "clearly anti-semitic" - but without naming the site or linking to it so as to allow readers to check for themselves.[5][6][7][8]

Limitations

Many European countries have laws forbidding or limiting critical discussion of the Holocaust official narrative. These include Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, and Switzerland. In practice, the extent to which these are enforced varies, but some people have been

"Defense of terrorism"

In January 2015, less that a week after freedom of speech was celebrated in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo shooting, dozens of people were arrested in an act of mass censorship by the French government.[4]


 

An example

Page nameDescription
Section 230Federal regulations mainly affecting Big Tech.

 

Related Quotations

PageQuoteAuthorDate
"Extremism"“Should these extremist views be allow [sic.] in society with the risk they could incite some to violence?”Admin9 April 2011
"Hate speech"“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”George Orwell
Idi Amin“There is freedom of speech, but I cannot guarantee freedom after speech.”Idi Amin
Boston Herald“These are the facts: Vaccines don’t cause autism. Measles can kill. And lying to vulnerable people about the health and safety of their children ought to be a hanging offense.”Boston Herald editorial staff8 May 2017
Daily Mail“The headline should read "Sussex University examines claims made by professor etc", not just "investigate professor" without certifying if the claim he made is valid or not. Another case of guilty before case proven!”'Fizzelle'7 November 2018
Saagar Enjeti@jack was the last of the tech CEOS who at least on a personal level was committed to free speech. His departure is probably going to make Twitter a lot worse for censorship (which is truly saying something)”Saagar Enjeti29 November 2021
Michael Gunner“The BS that’s flying around on the internet about the territory is coming from flogs outside the territory – mostly America, Canada and the UK,” Mr Gunner told a media conference on Thursday. People who have nothing better to do than make up lies about us because their own lives are so small and so sad. If anybody thinks we’re going to be distracted by tin foil hat-wearing tossers sitting in their parents’ basement in Florida – then you do not know us Territorians”Michael Gunner25 November 2021
Internet/Censorship“For some time to come, the delicate balance between freedom and security may have to shift”Tony AbbottSeptember 2014
Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador“Yes, social media should not be used to incite violence and all that, but this cannot be used as a pretext to suspend freedom of expression. How can a company act as if it was all powerful, omnipotent, as a sort of Spanish Inquisition on what is expressed?”Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador14 January 2021

 

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Julian Assange makes first public statement since prison releaseblog post1 October 2024Andy Worthington"Freedom of expression and all that flows from it is at a dark crossroad. I fear that unless norm-setting institutions like PACE wake up to the gravity of the situation it will be too late. Let us all commit to doing our part to ensure that the light of freedom never dims, that the pursuit of truth will live on, and that the voices of the many are not silenced by the interests of the few."
Document:Tactics of Organized Jewry in Suppressing Free Speechspeech transcriptJune 2002Tony MartinAn edited transcript of Prof. Martins address to the 14th Conference of the Institute for Historical Review in Irvine, California about the tactics of organised Jewry in suppressing information they deem harmful to them
Document:White House Must Establish Disinformation Defense and Free Expression Task Forceopen letter29 April 2021Electronic Frontier Foundation
Center for American Progress
Poynter Institute
Free Press
Access Now
Public Knowledge
Common Cause
PEN America
Andre Banks
Ashley Bryant
Win Black
Center for Democracy & Technology
Digital Democracy Project
Katy Byron
Simply Secure
Voto Latino
A number of alleged "free-speech organizations" begging to join the US government in implementing censorship in an Orwellian-named "Free Expression Task Force".


Rating

4star.png 9 April 2019 Robin  Good overview of this important topic
A useful closer look at this increasingly important topic.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References


57px-Notepad icon.png This is a page stub. Please add to it.