Difference between revisions of "Google News Initiative"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(unstub)
(some expand)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_News_Initiative
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_News_Initiative
 
|sourcewatch=
 
|sourcewatch=
|constitutes=
+
|influencewatch=https://www.influencewatch.org/for-profit/google-news-initiative/
 +
|constitutes=cartel,fact checker,funder
 
|logo=
 
|logo=
|start=
+
|start=2018
|description=
+
|description=Google and the deep state buying domination over corporate media and creating tools to censor independent voices.
 
|headquarters=
 
|headquarters=
|sponsors=First Draft Coalition,The Washington Post,South China Morning Post, International Fact Checking Network,ProPublica,Euronews,CrossCheck,The Guardian,Le Monde,BuzzFeed,The Economist,The New York Times,The Telegraph,Bellingcat,Transparency International,Bonnier News, Heise Medien,Deutsche Presse-Agentur, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Amedia Utvikling AS, Corriere della Sera, Counterpointing UK Ltd,Les Décodeurs,Deutsche Welle, Norwegian News Agency, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,Full Fact,Factmata Limited, Figaro, The Buzzard,Radio France,Socius,NRC Media,The Times, Libération, Project Syndicate,Bureau of Investigative Journalism, TT News Agency,VeriFlix,Credibility Coalition
+
|sponsors=First Draft Coalition,The Washington Post,South China Morning Post, International Fact Checking Network,ProPublica,Euronews,CrossCheck,The Guardian,Le Monde,BuzzFeed,The Economist,The New York Times,The Telegraph,Bellingcat,Transparency International,Bonnier News, Heise Medien,Deutsche Presse-Agentur, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Amedia Utvikling AS, Corriere della Sera, Counterpointing UK Ltd,Les Décodeurs,Deutsche Welle, Norwegian News Agency, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,Full Fact,Factmata Limited, Figaro, The Buzzard,Radio France,Socius,NRC Media,The Times, Libération, Project Syndicate,Bureau of Investigative Journalism, TT News Agency,VeriFlix,Credibility Coalition,Rappler,The Conversation (Australia),Crikey,O Globo,MuckRock, Vox,The Guardian,New York Times
 
|website=
 
|website=
 
|founders=
 
|founders=
Line 13: Line 14:
 
|members=
 
|members=
 
}}
 
}}
The '''Google News Initiative''' is a global team at [[Google]] whose mission is to "collaborate with journalists and entrepreneurs to help build the future of media".
+
The '''Google News Initiative''' is a global team at [[Google]] whose official mission is to "collaborate with journalists and entrepreneurs to help build the future of media".
  
 +
==Official narrative==
 
Google describe the goal of the Initiative as "helping journalism thrive in the digital age".<ref>https://newsinitiative.withgoogle.com/</ref> The company breaks spending into four areas:<ref>https://alt-dot-gweb-dni-v2.appspot.com/dnifund/documents/15/DNIFund_Report_2018.pdf</ref>
 
Google describe the goal of the Initiative as "helping journalism thrive in the digital age".<ref>https://newsinitiative.withgoogle.com/</ref> The company breaks spending into four areas:<ref>https://alt-dot-gweb-dni-v2.appspot.com/dnifund/documents/15/DNIFund_Report_2018.pdf</ref>
  
*Battling misinformation
+
*Battling [[misinformation]]
 
*Telling local stories
 
*Telling local stories
 
*Boosting digital revenues
 
*Boosting digital revenues
 
*Exploring new technologies
 
*Exploring new technologies
  
The European part of the initiative (the Digital News Initiative), sponsors or collaborates with<ref>https://newsinitiative.withgoogle.com/dnifund/dni-projects/?sort-by=alpha</ref> many hundred media companies and [[fact checkers]], the list above is just a small selection. The DNI Fund has awarded more than €140m to 662 projects in 30 European countries. This certainly influences reporting about Google, among other subject matters.  
+
The European part of the initiative (the Digital News Initiative), sponsors or collaborates with<ref>https://newsinitiative.withgoogle.com/dnifund/dni-projects/?sort-by=alpha</ref> many hundred media companies and [[fact checkers]], the list (on the right) is just a small selection.  
  
Of the grantees,none of the companies challenges established narratives in big issues, like geopolitics.
+
As of late 2020, the Google News Initiative reported distributing more than $189 million to 6,250 news organizations in 118 countries.<ref>https://www.rcinet.ca/en/2020/11/21/google-says-its-news-project-has-funded-189m-6000-news-partners/</ref>
  
For example, in [[2018]], while campaigning against the proposed Directive on Copyright in the EU, [[Google]] encouraged members of the Initiative's working group to lobby their regional MEPs. The private request was revealed by the [[Financial Times]],<ref>https://www.ft.com/content/a8031d7a-78a0-11e8-bc55-50daf11b720d</ref> itself a recipient of grants from the Initiative,
+
==Problems with official narrative==
 +
The large amounts of cash influences reporting about [[Google]] itself, among other subject matters.<ref>https://gizmodo.com/google-tries-to-buy-journalists-off-with-some-honestly-1845370184</ref> Of the grantees, none can be found that challenges the [[official narrative]] on big issues, where the [[Overton Window]] is established by [[fact checkers]].<ref>https://newsinitiative.withgoogle.com/info/innovation-challenges/funding/ List of grantees examined in February 2023</ref><ref>https://newsinitiative.withgoogle.com/info/partnerships#industry-partners</ref>
 +
 
 +
In [[2018]], while campaigning against the proposed Directive on Copyright in the EU, [[Google]] encouraged members of the Initiative's working group to lobby their regional MEPs. The private request was revealed by the [[Financial Times]],<ref>https://www.ft.com/content/a8031d7a-78a0-11e8-bc55-50daf11b720d</ref> itself a recipient of grants from the Initiative.
 +
 
 +
==2020 study==
 +
A [[2020]] study by [[Alexander Fanta]] and [[Ingo Dachwitz]] concluded among other things that<ref>https://www.otto-brenner-stiftung.de/fileadmin/user_data/stiftung/02_Wissenschaftsportal/03_Publikationen/AH103_Google_EN.pdf</ref>:
 +
 
 +
*Google’s initiatives consistently came about in response to growing political pressure.<ref>https://www.otto-brenner-stiftung.de/fileadmin/user_data/stiftung/02_Wissenschaftsportal/03_Publikationen/AH103_Google_EN.pdf page 89</ref>
 +
 
 +
*In the European part, some three quarters of the funding millions went to commercial media organisations, the largest share to [[Germany]]. Only four of the 28 large projects to receive funding of more than 300,000 euros in Germany were at regional publishers. At the other end of the spectrum are major publishing empires such as [[Dieter von Holtzbrinck Medien]], [[Funke Mediengruppe]], and [[Gruner + Jahr]], each of whom received between 3 and 10 million euros. More precise figures cannot be provided, since neither Google nor the majority of recipients espouse transparency regarding specific funding amounts.
 +
 
 +
*Google is helping to decide who wins the battle for survival in the beleaguered media market.
 +
 
 +
*This impression is reinforced by the findings relating to Google funded industry events, [[fellowships]], and training programmes. It is shown that Google’s sponsorship has made it a platform for industry debate it self, while giving young [[journalists]] a step up on the [[career ladder]]. There is barely an industry event in Germany and [[Europe]] that takes place without the involvement of the data corporation. In Germany alone, the company has also sponsored 50 fellowships, giving students of journalism the chance to spend time working at leading media organisations such as the [[Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung]], [[Der Spiegel]], and [[Zeit|Zeit Online]]. This not only gives Google a seat at the table during industry discussions; it is also defining a generation of budding media professionals.
  
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 05:30, 11 February 2023

Group.png Google News Initiative  
(Cartel, Fact checker, FunderInfluencewatchRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Formation2018
Member ofFirst Draft
Sponsor ofFirst Draft Coalition, The Washington Post, South China Morning Post, International Fact Checking Network, ProPublica, Euronews, CrossCheck, The Guardian, Le Monde, BuzzFeed, The Economist, The New York Times, The Telegraph, Bellingcat, Transparency International, Bonnier News, Heise Medien, Deutsche Presse-Agentur, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Amedia Utvikling AS, Corriere della Sera, Counterpointing UK Ltd, Les Décodeurs, Deutsche Welle, Norwegian News Agency, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Full Fact, Factmata Limited, Figaro, The Buzzard, Radio France, Socius, NRC Media, The Times, Libération, Project Syndicate, Bureau of Investigative Journalism, TT News Agency, VeriFlix, Credibility Coalition, Rappler, The Conversation (Australia), Crikey, O Globo, MuckRock, Vox, The Guardian, New York Times
Google and the deep state buying domination over corporate media and creating tools to censor independent voices.

The Google News Initiative is a global team at Google whose official mission is to "collaborate with journalists and entrepreneurs to help build the future of media".

Official narrative

Google describe the goal of the Initiative as "helping journalism thrive in the digital age".[1] The company breaks spending into four areas:[2]

  • Battling misinformation
  • Telling local stories
  • Boosting digital revenues
  • Exploring new technologies

The European part of the initiative (the Digital News Initiative), sponsors or collaborates with[3] many hundred media companies and fact checkers, the list (on the right) is just a small selection.

As of late 2020, the Google News Initiative reported distributing more than $189 million to 6,250 news organizations in 118 countries.[4]

Problems with official narrative

The large amounts of cash influences reporting about Google itself, among other subject matters.[5] Of the grantees, none can be found that challenges the official narrative on big issues, where the Overton Window is established by fact checkers.[6][7]

In 2018, while campaigning against the proposed Directive on Copyright in the EU, Google encouraged members of the Initiative's working group to lobby their regional MEPs. The private request was revealed by the Financial Times,[8] itself a recipient of grants from the Initiative.

2020 study

A 2020 study by Alexander Fanta and Ingo Dachwitz concluded among other things that[9]:

  • Google’s initiatives consistently came about in response to growing political pressure.[10]
  • In the European part, some three quarters of the funding millions went to commercial media organisations, the largest share to Germany. Only four of the 28 large projects to receive funding of more than 300,000 euros in Germany were at regional publishers. At the other end of the spectrum are major publishing empires such as Dieter von Holtzbrinck Medien, Funke Mediengruppe, and Gruner + Jahr, each of whom received between 3 and 10 million euros. More precise figures cannot be provided, since neither Google nor the majority of recipients espouse transparency regarding specific funding amounts.
  • Google is helping to decide who wins the battle for survival in the beleaguered media market.
  • This impression is reinforced by the findings relating to Google funded industry events, fellowships, and training programmes. It is shown that Google’s sponsorship has made it a platform for industry debate it self, while giving young journalists a step up on the career ladder. There is barely an industry event in Germany and Europe that takes place without the involvement of the data corporation. In Germany alone, the company has also sponsored 50 fellowships, giving students of journalism the chance to spend time working at leading media organisations such as the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Der Spiegel, and Zeit Online. This not only gives Google a seat at the table during industry discussions; it is also defining a generation of budding media professionals.


Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References