Difference between revisions of "Face mask"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Points of note: graphene)
Line 50: Line 50:
 
*An August 2020 review by a German professor in virology, epidemiology and hygiene found that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of face masks and that the improper daily use of masks by the public may in fact lead to an increase in infections.<ref>https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/a-1174-6591</ref>
 
*An August 2020 review by a German professor in virology, epidemiology and hygiene found that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of face masks and that the improper daily use of masks by the public may in fact lead to an increase in infections.<ref>https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/a-1174-6591</ref>
  
 +
==Media==
 +
[[image:Forbes mask mandates.png|thumbnail|Inaccessible since 18 August 2021.]]
 +
[[Forbes]] deleted an article by [[Zak Ringelstein]] titled "School Mask Mandates Mean Trauma For Millions Of Children" for an unknown reason.
 +
<ref>https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakringelstein/2021/08/18/school-mask-mandates-mean-trauma-for-millions-of-children-especially-those-from-low-income-families/?sh=1eab362d23a8</ref>
 
==Society==
 
==Society==
 
[[image:Virtue singalling masks london underground.jpg|thumb|left|A [[Labour Party]] councillor virtue signals on [[Twitter]] and gets [[ratioed]] hard.]]
 
[[image:Virtue singalling masks london underground.jpg|thumb|left|A [[Labour Party]] councillor virtue signals on [[Twitter]] and gets [[ratioed]] hard.]]

Revision as of 07:00, 4 September 2021

See also sensory deprivation.

Concept.png Face mask 
(torture,  psychological operation,  COVID-19/Legislation)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png 5
Respo reusable face mask certified to en1827 n95 n99 1.jpg
Interest of• Bryan Ardis
• DELVE
• Jeremy Howard
From an obscure phenomenon, face masks became a central part of the COVID-19 psychological operation starting in March 2020.

Face masks were a relatively obscure phenomenon before the COVID-19 event started in March 2020; mainly used by doctors during surgery, in medical settings and somewhat popular in East Asia, mostly against air pollution. No studies of long term or widespread use of face masks had been done, for the simple reason that it was never considered a medically sound idea.

Points of note

Like the concept of lockdown and other parts of the COVID-19 psychological operation, the idea of forcing everyone to wear a face cover originates in the military/prison complex. Here from a 2008 demonstration protesting torture in the Guantanamo concentration camp.[1][2]

The idea caught on and has multiple aspects, some of which are not fully understood, and might imply careful planning as part of a broader operation.

  • For a start, the mask functions as a muzzle, physically and metaphorically gagging people.
  • The masks turn people into faceless entities, the population into an undistinguished mass, which conspicuously fits with how the rulers of the world sees them.
  • The policy confuses and disorients people, making clear thinking difficult.
  • The masks function as a constant reminder of a medical danger that would otherwise not be observed. This has led to widespread insanity, with some people not having taken off their masks for years on end.
  • The masks function as a reminder of the state's power over you.
  • The masks function as a self-policing device, where people can monitor each other and social pressure will make people bow to compliance.
  • The masks, which are supposed to be changed several times a day, hugely increase the rate of pneumonia and respiratory diseases.
  • a. This contributes to the wanted COVID-emergency.
  • b. Long-term weakening of people's respiratory systems might be a goal in itself.
  • Masks function as a blackmail device, where good behavior (taking vaccines, allowing children to take the vaccine) will be rewarded with a promised removal of forced masks.
  • A large proportion of masks contain graphene, a novel industrial material also present in the the PCR-tests and - allegedly - the RNA-vaccines and with insufficiently tested health effects.
  • a. The thin and lightweight, yet tough and intractable particles "are notoriously worrisome in terms of the detrimental effects they can have on our health, particularly when breathed in…”[3].
  • b. In addition, researchers from the EU Graphene Flagship project discovered that "injecting graphene oxide into a specific region of the brain silences the neurons responsible for anxious behaviour," making Jon Rappoport ask; "Are millions of people walking around in a sedated dumbed-down haze, because they’re wearing masks?"[4]

Mask mandates

Full article: Mask mandates
After 2020, corporate media and some governments started pushing the idea that several layers of masks would be even more "effective"

Permanent mask wearing is being made law in countries.

In July 2021, Mayor of Washington DC Muriel Bowser announced a new mask mandate for everyone over 2 years old.[5]

A pressing issue in American schools. The Williamson County Schools Board of Education in Tennessee voted to require masks for students, staff and visitors inside and on school premises. Parents are angry.[6]

Studies on Safety and Efficiency

BBC journalist Deborah Cohen found out the WHO agreed to it because of political lobbying[7]

As Swiss Policy Research pointed out "for decades, studies have shown that face masks don’t work[8] against respiratory virus epidemics. But with the onset of the coronavirus pandemic and increasing political pressure, suddenly studies appeared claiming the opposite. In reality, these studies were a mixture of confounded observational data, unrealistic modelling and lab results, and outright fraud. The most influential fraudulent study certainly was the WHO-mandated meta-study published in The Lancet[9]."

  • A May 2020 meta-study on pandemic influenza published by the US CDC found that face masks had no effect, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control. [10]
  • A Danish randomized controlled trial with 6000 participants, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine in November 2020, found no statistically significant effect of high-quality medical face masks against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a community setting. [11]
  • A large randomized controlled trial with close to 8000 participants, published in October 2020 in PLOS One, found that face masks “did not seem to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections nor against clinical respiratory infection.” [12]
  • A February 2021 review by the European CDC found no high-quality evidence supporting the effectiveness of non-medical and medical face masks in the community. Furthermore, the European CDC advised against the use of FFP2/N95 masks by the general public. [13]
  • A July 2020 review by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine found that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of face masks against virus infection or transmission. [14]
  • A November 2020 Cochrane review found that face masks did not reduce influenza-like illness (ILI) cases, neither in the general population nor in health care workers. [15]
  • An April 2020 review by two US professors in respiratory and infectious disease from the University of Illinois concluded that face masks have no effect in everyday life, neither as self-protection nor to protect third parties (so-called source control). [16]
  • An article in the New England Journal of Medicine from May 2020 came to the conclusion that face masks offer little to no protection in everyday life. [17]
  • A 2015 study in the British Medical Journal BMJ Open found that cloth masks were penetrated by 97% of particles and may increase infection risk by retaining moisture or repeated use. [18]
  • An August 2020 review by a German professor in virology, epidemiology and hygiene found that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of face masks and that the improper daily use of masks by the public may in fact lead to an increase in infections.[19]

Media

Inaccessible since 18 August 2021.

Forbes deleted an article by Zak Ringelstein titled "School Mask Mandates Mean Trauma For Millions Of Children" for an unknown reason. [20]

Society

A Labour Party councillor virtue signals on Twitter and gets ratioed hard.
Masks have been used as a form of Virtue signalling.

Face masks have been used for self satisfaction. Society has used Fearmongering to normalise face masks, at the expense of human interaction.

Politics

Labour, Liberal Democrats and SNP mask up, Tories opt out. (Top Left); Jeremy Corbyn, John McDonnell, Zarah Sultana wear face masks. So does Theresa May (bottom right). {Opposition benches above, government benches below}

On 18 August 2021, the UK Parliament was recalled due to the situation in Afghanistan; particularly the Afghanistan/2021 withdraw. The BBC noted that most Conservative Party MPs did not wear face masks despite it being under government public health guidelines.


 

Related Quotations

PageQuoteAuthorDate
Ron DeSantis“Politicians want to force you to cover your face as a way for them to cover their own asses that's just the truth they want to be able to say they're taking this on and they're doing this even though it's not proven to be effective they want to continue to do it”Ron DeSantis22 August 2021
Arne Duncan“Have you noticed how strikingly similar both the mindsets and actions are between the suicide bombers at Kabul’s airport, and the anti-mask and anti-vax people here? They both blow themselves up, inflict harm on those around them, and are convinced they are fighting for freedom.”Arne Duncan29 August 2021
Alexander Lukashenko“It’s just over the top to send police to track down those who aren’t wearing masks. We aren’t the West.”Alexander Lukashenko23 October 2021
Jacob Rees-MoggMasks are worn more by socialists when there are television cameras around than when they are not going to be seen.”Jacob Rees-Mogg21 October 2021

 

Related Document

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Women's March petitions Jack Dorsey to ban Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene from TwitterArticle14 August 2021Libby EmmonsThe leading American feminist organisation is pressuring Twitter to remove Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene from their platform. She stands accused of promoting "conspiracy theories" about COVID over her scepticism of Fauci. She has been censored before. How much longer is there before she is permanently banned?


Rating

5star.png 10 October 2021 Terje 
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.



References

  1. http://web.archive.org/web/20210828003641/https://www.flickr.com/photos/amnestyni/2185674368
  2. Pictures from different events in the 2007/2008 period.
  3. Rapoport quotes: "Ken Donaldson is a respiratory toxicologist at the University of Edinburgh and he and his colleagues are among the first to raise the warning flag on graphene, at least for nanoscopic platelets of the material. It is not too great a leap of the imagination to imagine how such tiny flakes of carbon might be transported deep within the lungs similar to asbestos fibres and coal dust. Once lodged within, there is no likely mechanism for the removal or break down of such inert particles and they might reside on these sensitive tissues triggering a chronic inflammatory response or interfering with the normal cellular functions.”
  4. https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/08/30/soothing-symptoms-of-anxiety-with-graphene-oxide-its-in-millions-of-masks/
  5. https://www.rt.com/usa/530624-washington-mask-mandate-children/
  6. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9885093/Clay-Travis-slams-cosmetic-theater-masks-tense-Tennessee-school-board-meeting.html/
  7. https://archive.is/20201205224307/https://twitter.com/deb_cohen/status/1282244773030633473#selection-4233.0-4270.1
  8. https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/
  9. For decades, studies have shown that face masks don’t work against respiratory virus epidemics. But with the onset of the coronavirus pandemic and increasing political pressure (see below), suddenly studies appeared claiming the opposite. In reality, these studies were a mixture of confounded observational data, unrealistic modelling and lab results, and outright fraud. The most influential fraudulent study certainly was the WHO-mandated meta-study published in The Lancet.
  10. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article
  11. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article
  12. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240287
  13. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/covid-19-face-masks-community-first-update.pdf
  14. https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/masking-lack-of-evidence-with-politics/
  15. https://www.cochrane.org/CD006207/ARI_do-physical-measures-such-hand-washing-or-wearing-masks-stop-or-slow-down-spread-respiratory-viruses
  16. https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data
  17. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372
  18. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
  19. https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/a-1174-6591
  20. https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakringelstein/2021/08/18/school-mask-mandates-mean-trauma-for-millions-of-children-especially-those-from-low-income-families/?sh=1eab362d23a8