Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed

From Wikispooks
(Redirected from Nafeez Ahmed)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Person.png Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed   Amazon C-SPAN IMDB LinkedIn Medium Patreon Twitter Unwelcome Guests WebsiteRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
(Academic, Journalist)
Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed.jpg
Alma materUniversity of Sussex
Interests • False flags
• Israeli–Palestinian conflict
• Robert Steele
Interest of"Philip Cross"
UK academic with extensive knowledge of deep politics and the use of false flag terror, featured frequently on Unwelcome Guests.
Dr Nafeez Ahmed is a UK academic with extensive knowledge of deep politics and the use of false flag terror. He has featured frequently on Unwelcome Guests.[1]


He has made extensive study of false flag attacks and the origins of "Islamic terrorism".


He used to write for the Guardian until his interest in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict proved too much for them and he was summarily dismissed after writing about the gas reserves off Gaza.[2]


September 11, 2001

Full article: Rated 4/5 9-11

Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed's work was cited by the 9/11 Commission[Where?]. Ahmed wrote in a 2015 article entitled 9/11, conspiracy theory, and bullshit mongers that "my position on 9/11 is pretty simple: I don't indulge in theory. I detest speculation. I particularly hate the very phrase "inside job," which is a meaningless bullshit euphemism for "I don't actually have cast iron proof of specifically who perpetrated this operation, or how it occurred, but IT WAS THE GOVERNMENT": a vague, amorphous cop-out typical of the conspiracy industry in general."[3]

Attacks against Vanessa Beeley and Eva Bartlett

Ahmed attacked Vanessa Beeley and Eva Bartlett for their reporting from the war in Syria and especially about the white helmets[4] with a paper released in July 2018.[5][6][7]

Covid 19

Full article: Covid-19
Nafeez Ahmed-Great Barrington Declaration.png


Documents by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed

TitleDocument typePublication dateSubject(s)Description
Document:7/7 Terror and Tortureblog post7 July 2010Torture
2005 London bombings
Document:David Cameron's 'counter extremism' experts work with far-right Donald Trump sympathisersArticle19 December 2015Quilliam Foundation
Frank Gaffney
Henry Jackson Society
English Defence League
Donald Trump
Clarion Project
The link between the two organisations (Henry Jackson Society and Quilliam Foundation) and Donald Trump is Frank Gaffney, who was the chief inspiration for Trump’s call to ban Muslims from entering the United States
Document:Riot Fever as a Symptom of Systemic Failurewebpage9 August 20112011 England riots
Document:The Astonishingly Crap Science of 'Counter-Extremism'webpage17 March 2016"Extremism"
An expose of the crass lack of any valid scientific basis of government strategies to fight radicalisation. Nafeez Ahmed agrues that the "most academically accurate concept to capture this absurd level of crappiness is ‘bullshit’".
File:The War on Freedom.pdfbook20029-11An overview of the events of 9-11, what lay behind them and where responsibility lies


Quotes by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed

Document:Sins of Statecraft - The War on Terror Exposed“a group of powerful elites from various countries gathered at an international conference in Jerusalem to promote and exploit the idea of ‘international terrorism.’ The (Jerusalem) conference (on International Terrorism, or JCIT) established the ideological foundations for the ‘war on terror.’ JCIT’s defining theme was that international terrorism constituted an organized political movement whose ultimate origin was in the Soviet Union. All terrorist groups were ultimately products of, and could be traced back to, this single source, which - according to the JCIT - provided financial, military, and logistical assistance to disparate terrorist movements around the globe. The mortal danger to Western security and democracy posed by the worldwide scope of this international terrorist movement required an appropriate worldwide anti-terrorism offensive, consisting of the mutual coordination of Western military intelligence services.”2005The War on Truth
Operation Gladio/B“A journalist with the Sunday Times‘ investigative unit told this author he had interviewed former Special Agent in Charge, Dennis Saccher, who had moved to the FBI’s Colorado office. Saccher reportedly confirmed the veracity of Edmonds’ allegations of espionage, telling him that Edmonds’ story “should have been front page news” because it was “a scandal bigger than Watergate.””
Reform UK“Unbeknown to many, UKIP too had early roots in Britain’s intelligence services.”11 May 2015Insurge Intelligence
Religion“Some years ago, a leaked MI5 behavioural study of pathways to terrorism concluded that there was no single profile or pathway to violent radicalisation. It also found, contrary to conventional assumptions, that religious conservatism tended to act as a bulwark against extremism.”13 February 2015Insurge Intelligence
UK Independence Party“Unbeknown to many, UKIP too had early roots in Britain’s intelligence services.

In 2001, former Conservative Party chairman Norman Tebbit called for an independent inquiry into revelations that UKIP had been infiltrated by MI5. In a televised interview on BBC News, Tebbit said:

“A chap came to me and said UKIP had been infiltrated by the British intelligence services and then he gave me two names of people and from various ways I came to the conclusion that I was absolutely and completely certain that these people — although they had left the service and the Foreign Office some years earlier — in fact had been intelligence agents.”

As Tebbit explained in a Spectator article that even Douglas Murray recently endorsed, he “half-heartedly” made his “own inquiries” after a source inside UKIP raised the concerns with him, “and unexpectedly struck gold... I am perfectly sure that the individuals had been active agents, although both would claim to have retired some years ago.”

Tebbit had not suggested that UKIP’s leadership was aware of the intelligence operation. At the time, Nigel Farage admitted that he could not discount Tebbit’s allegations.”
11 May 2015Insurge Intelligence


Related Document

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:HSBC and the sham of Guardian’s Scott TrustArticle3 March 2015Jonathan CookBritain, we are told, is privileged to have two “liberal” media outlets, the BBC and Guardian, that are seen either as neutral or as a leftwing counterbalance to the rightwing agenda of the rest of the media. Here are three illuminating articles and a short video that should help to dispel any such illusions.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.