| Noam Chomsky |
|Born||Avram Noam Chomsky|
December 7, 1928
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
|Alma mater||University of Pennsylvania|
|Children|| • Aviva Chomsky|
• Diane Chomsky
• Harry Chomsky
|Spouse|| • Carol Doris Schatz|
• Valeria Wasserman
|Member of||Institute for Policy Studies, International Tribunal of Natural Justice, Justice for Megrahi|
|Interests|| • US foreign policy|
• Propaganda research
• Jeffrey Epstein
Publicly acclaimed critic of US foreign policy with an encyclopedic knowledge of history, Chomsky has become a gatekeeper by his refusal to contemplate false flag attacks. By 2021 turned proponent of starving dissidents to death in concentration camps.
Noam Chomsky is an American linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, political activist, and professor emeritus at MIT. He is an eloquent and renowned critic of US foreign policy and states that the United States is the biggest terrorist state in the world, but is a firm supporter of the the US government's official narrative of what happened on September 11, 2001. His failure to address the issue of false flag terror has led many to term him as a gatekeeper.
Denial of Deep Politics
Chomsky notably refuses to address the reality of deep politics. He has nothing to say about false flag attacks and other such deep events. He once exclaimed "Even if it were true [that 9/11 was an inside job], which is extremely unlikely, who cares? I mean, it doesn’t have any significance.". Left gatekeepers like Democracy Now! repeatedly choose Chomsky to interview about 9/11. Chomsky has also claimed the assassination of Kennedy didn't change much, which would include the trajectory of the Vietnam War.
Concentration camps and Covid
In May 2012, Chomsky stated:
“I mean, look, there’s a lot of, I think there’s a lot of excessive concern in activist groups about state repression. So take, say, there’s paranoia about concentration camps. You know, they’re gonna lock us up, NDAA says they can detain us indefinitely. Concentration camps have been there since the 50s. Back in the 1950s the liberal Democrats, Humphrey and Lehman, introduced legislation to set up internment camps in case people got out of control. I don’t know, I never followed to see what happened but I know the legislation was passed. But they can’t do anything about it...And if they try they’ll arouse popular reaction. So power really is in the hands of the governed if they’re willing to use it.”
Noam Chomsky (May 2012) 
By 2021, he himself was a proponent of starving people to death in concentration camps:
“(when questioned about unvaccinated people he makes a comparison to people who do not want to stop at traffic lights) [...] they should have the decency to remove themselves from the community. If they refuse to do that, then measures have to be taken to safeguard the community from them. Then comes the practical question, that you ask. How can we get food to them? Well, that's actually their problem. Of course if they really become destitute, then yes, you have to move in with some measure to secure their survival, just as you do with people in jail for example [...]”
Noam Chomsky 
“(On the question of mandating vaccines) [...] people who refuse to accept vaccines, I think the right response for them is not to force them to, but rather to insist that they be isolated. If people decide I am willing to be a danger to the community by refusing a vaccine, they should then say well I also have the decency to isolate myself. Ok, I dont want a vaccine, but I don't have the right to run around harming people. That should be a convention. Enforcing is a different question. It should be a understood, and we should try to get it to be understood. If it really reaches the point, where they are severely endangering people, then of course you have to do something about it. So if someone, if smallpox turns out to become rampant again, and some people are insisting on running around public places were they might have smallpox, well you got to so something about them [...]”
Noam Chomsky 
In November 2017, the International Peace Bureau announced that Noam Chomsky had been awarded the MacBride Peace Prize "for his tireless commitment to peace, his strong critiques to US foreign policy, and his anti-imperialism."
Chomsky has been properly described as "a genuine people’s hero, an inspiration for struggles all over the world for that basic decency known as freedom", as “one of the greatest and most radical public thinkers of our time”, “one of the most significant challengers of unjust power and delusions”, and as a ‘guru’ for the world’s anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist movement. In recent years, in addition to his continuing contributions to the fields of linguistics, philosophy and cognitive science, his critiques have focused on the US post-9-11 “War on Terror” which has provided cover for a continuation of US imperial policies, and the imperative of addressing the dangers posed by nuclear weapons and climate change.
|Does Noam Chomsky Deserve Our Respect? / Overwritten with Dack Rouleau|
- Full article: International Tribunal of Natural Justice
- Full article: International Tribunal of Natural Justice
On sex and politics
Chomsky has said:
Same thing is true here - when the press focuses on the sex lives of politicians, reach for your pocket, and see who’s pulling out your wallet, because those are not the issues that matter to people. I mean, they’re very marginal interest. The issues that matter to people are somewhere else, so as soon as you hear, you know, the press and presidential candidates and so on, talking about "values", as I say, put your hand on your wallet - you know that something else is happening."
Meetings with Jeffrey Epstein
In 2023, Jeffrey Epstein's meeting calendar was published, which confirmed earlier admissions of meetings by Epstein. The calendar included several meetings between Chomsky and Epstein that took place during the years 2015 and 2016, while Chomsky taught at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Chomsky told the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) that he met with Epstein to discuss topics like neuroscience with other academics, like Harvard’s Martin Nowak (who was heavily funded by Epstein). According to Epstein, his interest in inviting Chomsky to his house was explicitly related to artificial intelligence.
On a separate occasion, Chomsky again met with Epstein alongside former Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Barak, allegedly to discuss "Israel’s policies with regard to Palestinian issues and the international arena." A separate date saw Chomsky and his wife invited by Epstein to have dinner with him, Woody Allen and Allen’s wife Soon-Yi Previn. When asked about the dinner date with Woody Allen and Epstein, Chomsky referred to the occasion as "an evening spent with a great artist." Aside from Epstein, both Ehud Barak and Woody Allen have been accused of having inappropriate sexual relationships with minors.
When confronted with the meeting calendar, Chomsky initially told WSJ that his meetings and relationship with Epstein were "none of your business. Or anyone’s." He then added that "I knew him [Epstein] and we met occasionally.". The ties between Chomsky and Epstein were extensively researched by Whitney Webb.
Depending on your political bias you may have different views on the divisive Noam Chomsky.
- From a conservative perspective you'll see Chomsky as supporting communist totalitarian regimes and all their evils (see InfoGalactic)
- From a truther perspective, you'll see Chomsky as a gatekeeper, limited hangout, and government lifetime actor at MIT (as here on Wikispooks).
- From a liberal perspective, you'll see Chomsky with the "official" narrative bias of corporate media, as supporting socialist corporate Democrats despite all their evils (as layd out on Wikipedia)
|Hedges v. Obama||Daniel Ellsberg|
US Department of Defense
United States of America
|13 January 2012||28 April 2014||The plaintiffs challenged the 2012 NDAA contending that indefinite detention on "suspicion of providing substantial support" to groups such as al-Qaeda and the Taliban was so vague as to allow unconstitutional, indefinite detention of civilians based on vague allegations. The Court of Appeals struck down an initial agreement, and the US Supreme Court concurred, arguing that the plaintiffs could not prove they would be affected by the law, so had no standing to contest it.|
Quotes by Noam Chomsky
|Alan Dershowitz||“... not only a remarkable liar and slanderer, but also an extreme opponent of elementary civil rights.”||17 August 2006||Noam Chomsky web site|
|FBI||“According to its analysis of the documents in this FBI office, 1 percent were devoted to organized crime, mostly gambling; 30 percent were "manuals, routine forms, and similar procedural matter"; 40 percent were devoted to political surveillance and the like, including two cases involving right-wing groups, ten concerning immigrants, and over 200 on left or liberal groups. Another 14 percent of the documents concerned draft resistance and "leaving the military without government permission." The remainder concerned bank robberies, murder, rape, and interstate theft.”|
|John Gaddis||“John Lewis Gaddis is not only the favorite historian of the Reagan administration, but he's regarded as the dean of Cold War scholarship, the leading figure in the American Cold War scholarship, a professor at Yale.”|
|Hypocrisy||“let me formulate a thesis. The thesis is that we are all total hypocrites on any issue relating to terrorism. Now, let me clarify the notion "we." By "we," I mean people like us — people who have enough high degree of privilege, of training, resources, access to information — for whom it is pretty easy to find out the truth about things if we want to. If we decide that that is our vocation, and in the case in question, you don't really have to dig very deep, it's all right on the surface. So when I say "we," I mean that category. And I definitely mean to include myself in "we" because I have never proposed that our leaders be subjected to the kinds of punishment that I have recommended for enemies. So that is hypocrisy. So if there are people who escape it I really don't know them and have not come across them. It's a very powerful culture. It's hard to escape its grasp. So that's thesis number one, we are all total hypocrites, in the sense of the gospels, on the matter of terrorism. The second thesis is stronger, namely, that the first thesis is so obvious that it takes real effort to miss it. In fact, I should go home right now because it is obvious [...] Well, from all of this an obvious conclusion follows: there is an operational definition of terrorism, the one that is actually used — it means terror that they carry out against us — that's terrorism, and nothing else passes through the filter.”||2002|
|Document:Left-leaning Despisers of the 9-11 Truth Movement||open letter||6 July 2010||David Ray Griffin|
- NOAM CHOMSKY: STARVE THE UNVAXXED - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #249, 26th Oct 2021
- "Press release: Séan MacBride Peace Prize 2017"
- See the article https://unlimitedhangout.com/2023/05/investigative-reports/unraveling-the-epstein-chomsky-relationship/