|Interest of||• 21st Century Wire|
• Russ Baker
• Max Blumenthal
• Mae Brussell
• Deep Politics Forum
• Dan Dicks
• Sibel Edmonds
• Lucy Morgan Edwards
• Bonnie Faulkner
• Gangster Government
• Robert Gore
• Richard Grove
• Mike Lofgren
• Kris Millegan
• Jefferson Morley
• Peggy Noonan
• Peter Dale Scott
• Antony Sutton
• Pelle Neroth Taylor
• The Corbett Report
• The Deep State Blog
• The Real News
• Ola Tunander
• Unwelcome Guests
• Patrick Willis
• Russ Winter
• Karel von Wolferen
|Subpage(s)||•Deep state/2017 Popularisation|
•Deep state/Supranational nature
|The deep state, state within a state, shadow government, permanent state or permanent government is a fluid network of individuals with de facto control of a national government. Many "democratically elected" governments work as fronts, allowing the deep state to operate in secret while providing a level of plausible deniability. On matters of deep political importance, the public machinery of government is routinely subverted by agents of the deep state.|
Not to be confused with the Supranational Deep State, the global alliance of increasingly interdependent deep state groups.
The deep state (loosely synonymous with the shadow government, or more rarely permanent government or permanent state) is in contrast to the public structures which appear to be directing individual nation states. It is an intensely secretive, informal, fluid network of deep politicians whose deep state milieux effectively amplify their influence over national governments.
- 1 Etymology and usage
- 2 Official Narrative
- 3 Organisation
- 4 Activities
- 5 Cultural references
- 6 Examples
- 7 Related Quotations
- 8 Related Documents
- 9 Rating
- 10 References
Etymology and usage
The phrase "deep state" derives from the Turkish "derin devlet". It emerged after the 1996 Susurluk car crash unmasked the Turkish deep state. Back in the 2000s and early 2010s, it was used by only a few commentators, sometimes within quotation marks. It experienced a surge of use in 2017, often not in keeping with the meaning attributed by the diplomat who coined the phrase.
The official narrative of deep states used to be that they were "conspiracy theory". This position was modified in the last few years to the claim that they don't exist here. In 2013 the New York Times defined the deep state as "a hard-to-perceive level of government or super-control that exists regardless of elections and that may thwart popular movements or radical change. Some have said that Egypt is being manipulated by its deep state." Since the Times (like the rest of the commercially-controlled media) is more or less a under the control of the deep state, such a mention is very interesting. The implication of the second half of their definition is clear:- countries other than Egypt are not being manipulated by a deep state. A 2012 blog post at the World Bank is clearer still:- "You think your country has undergone a transition to democracy... You realize that there are powerful elite formations bequeathed by years, even decades, of authoritarian rule still able to block progressive change and protect their interests." The statement that "deep states that exist in many youngish ‘democracies’" avoids discussion of nation states which have long claimed to be democracies.. A 2013 book entitled "Deep State" would soften the term, making no mention of false flag attacks and bemoaning 9-11 "conspiracy theorists".
- Full article: Deep state/2017 Popularisation
- Full article: Deep state/2017 Popularisation
The phrase "deep state" experienced a huge rise in usage after the election of Donald Trump. In March 2017, in particular, corporate media outlets all seemed to be offering contradictory ideas about what the term might mean, some denying its applicability to the US (arguing that "There is no American Deep State... it just looks like there is") others contradicting the original meaning by suggesting it was politically partisan. This is an interesting development given the mound of evidence that the deep state controls corporate media.
Since the early 19th and particularly in the 20th century, deep states in many nation states have worked to maintain a cover of party politics, focusing on personalities of individual politicians or issue of identity politics.
“Although elected representatives are supposed to be the ruling power we see them coming and going while the true powers in our lives — political parties, bureaucracies, business corporations, the media, institutions of law and justice, quangos, international treaty agreements, financial systems, regulators etcetera — get on with business.”
Ivo Mosley (2013) 
This façade was by and large successful at hiding the real business of deep politics from public scrutiny. In the 21st century, in spite of massive consolidation of corporate media, this veil is proving increasingly thin as deep state milieux, formerly only the stuff of rumour, are now increasingly well documented with photos, videos and leaked documents all online.
The core of deep state groups and deep state milieu could be summarised by Dwight Eisenhower's "Military-industrial-congressional complex", although intelligence agencies are essential to their functioning. They are made up of:
- The leadership of intelligence agencies;
- Deep politicians, i.e. individuals who set up deep state milieux and who broker agreements between other members of the deep state.
- Some senior or long-standing non-elected officials within government (e.g. top civil servants);
- Selected individuals with effective control of key commercial, military and/or criminal groups in:
- Full article: Supranational Deep State
- Full article: Supranational Deep State
Deep states often evolved as secret cabals to control particular nation states. However, although originating in particular localities, the corruption of governments has globalised as have other enterprises, resulting in an ever wider interlocking of deep state factions in the 21st century. A 2010 paper by Peter Dale Scott refers to "A Supranational Deep State", noting how their international integration effectively allows deep states to evade even the limited control national governments had in the early 20th century. Post 9-11, most deep state groups are members of an informal alliance known on this website as the Supranational Deep State. The need for secrecy has lead to extreme compartmentalisation, promotes infighting and hampers its effective control any of the deep state groups which make it up, possibly driving the 2020 lurch towards a global control grid with strict technological controls on freedom of speech and freedom of movement.
Deep state milieux
- Full article: Deep state milieu
- Full article: Deep state milieu
Deep state milieux, such as the (formerly very secret) Bilderberg group are organs of the deep state, places where deep state operatives can meet up, away from public scrutiny, and make plans. This is not to say that all visitors to such groups are members of, or even cognisant of, deep state operations; such groups also provide a place where potential members can be subject to evaluation — 1898 of the 2920 visitors to the Bilderberg only visited once.
Power relations between deep politicians remain fluid, so deep states should not be be seen as alternative power structures to the visible organisational structures which they dominate. Relationships between Mafia families offer a suitable parallel, combining an often uneasy cooperation with occasional violent and sudden change. All deep state groups share share a common interest in preventing exposure of the real goings on behind the facade of electoral politics, so even violently opposed factions can cooperate to hide the true nature of deep events.
Deep states are probably dominated by psychopaths and sociopaths. To preserve their power, they must not only stay in the shadows, but frustrate radical and progressive social change. Control of corporate media is essential to the effective operation of the deep state. In the US this is effected through deep state control of the CIA, which has huge influence over big media. With the apparatus of nation states under their control, their subterfuges can be elaborate and complex. Like Mafia families, deep state groups have a common interest in hiding their existence at all costs, leading to cooperation in times of crisis. As a Turkish cartoon put it in 1997 "Deep state protects its own."
- Full article: Deep Politics
- Full article: Deep Politics
"Deep Politics" is a term coined by Peter Dale Scott to describe the activities and issues of importance to the agents of the deep state. These may be only indirectly seen as connected to "politics"; in most countries of the world today, party politics is more or less used as a veneer to obscure the real considerations. In contrast to multiple levels of publicly aired political considerations, deep political motives are sometimes much simpler; Charlotte Denett, for example, suggests that the deep politics of WW1 and WW2 actually centered on control of the Middle East's resources of oil and natural gas.
- Full article: Deep Events
- Full article: Deep Events
Deep Events are the footprints of the deep state. Peter Dale Scott specifies 3 levels:
- Low level deep events, typically unnoticed at the time, are discovered only as part of later investigations.
- Mid level deep events, typically accompanied by a set of cover stories to obscure their deep political significance.
- Structural deep events, rare and ambitious, which to try to change entire societies, sometimes without them even knowing it.
The defining structural deep events of the late 20th century was the JFK Assassination, a coup d'etat that radically changed the US political scene. which the establishment presented it to US citizens as the work of a "lone nut".
The defining structural deep event of the 21st century was the 9/11 attacks, which the perpetual war known as the "War on Terror". Details such as Larry Silverstein's multi-billion dollar windfall and the insider trading are widely known, but evidence is accumulating that these were but minor parts of much larger suite of financial frauds carried out by deep political insiders who capitalised on the opportunity.
The second series of Douglas Adams' Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy concludes with the protagonists having finally located the ruler of the universe (a.k.a. the "man in the shack") who makes the real decisions that are ascribed to the President of The Galaxy. The posthumously produced series three of the radio series (produced after Adams' death) diffuses this plot by suggesting that this was a psychotic episode. In the (later) radio adaptation Trillian describes the idea of the secret ruler of the universe as a "conspiracy theory".
|Ancient Rome/Deep state||The Ancient Roman Deep State.|
|Australia/Deep state||The Australian deep state may be closely controlled from London/Washington, and used as a testground for emerging social control legislation.|
|Belgium/Deep state||The Belgian Deep state|
|Canada/Deep state||The Canadian Deep state|
|Denmark/Deep state||The Danish deep state|
|Europe/Deep state||As a highly secretive, long established deep state milieu, Le Cercle, has been active Europe wide in political subversion.|
|France/Deep state||The French deep state|
|Germany/Deep state||The German deep state was largely rebooted by the US deep state after the German defeat in WW2.|
|Greece/Deep state||The Greek deep state|
|Italy/Deep state||The Italian deep state, post-WW II, centered on the Operation Gladio network run through NATO and heavily influenced by the CIA and MI6.|
|Japan/Deep state||The Japanese deep state was reportedly rebooted by the US deep state after the Japanese defeat in WW2.|
|Norway/Deep state||The Norwegian Deep state, which has operated through the Norwegian Shipowners' Association, controls the Nobel Peace Prize.|
|Poland/Deep state||The Polish deep state|
|Romania/Deep state||The Romanian deep state|
|Russia/Deep state||The Russian Deep State.|
|SDS||Since the 1970s, the formerly separate deep states have gradually integrated and now routinely conspire to subvert governments and international organisations. The collective effort to cover-up 9/11 saw this emerging supergroup fuse into a single Supranational Deep State, one with direct control over governments, central banks and global trafficking of drugs, weapons, people etc. Its reliance on deception, however, continues to make its long term prospects far from certain.|
|Serbia/Deep state||The Serbian deep state|
|South Africa/Deep state||The South African deep state hosted many meetings of Le Cercle.|
|South Korea/Deep state||The South Korean Deep state was partially exposed after the Korean National Intelligence Service was engaged in vote rigging and using trolls to try to get Park Geun-hye elected.|
|Spain/Deep state||The Spanish deep state|
|Sweden/Deep state||The Swedish deep state|
|Turkey/Deep state||'Derin devlet' is a deep state network based in Turkey. Repeated indiscretions resulted in its partial exposure, leading to the English phrase 'deep state' to refer to the phenomenon of a 'state-within-a-state or 'shadow government'.|
|UK/Deep state||The British empire has long been influenced by various mostly unseen forces. These are being increasingly exposed in the 21st century. After WWI, the UK deep state increasingly came under the influence of the US deep state.|
|US/Deep state||The US deep state goes back centuries, but the modern form stems from a 1963 coup which fused an alliance into a single coherent Cabal. Under the leadership of George H. W. Bush after the Watergate coup, the group became centered on the Bush family. It has been aggressively waging a "War On Terror" since 9-11 quickened the supranational deep state. In recent years it has lacked clear leadership and suffered leaks, infighting, short-termism & confusion about handling its increasingly public profile.|
|Bureaucracy||“Having worked briefly in the Canadian bureaucracy, I have observed that bureaucratic debate where power is involved tends to favor paranoid or worst-case analyses, especially those that justify budget and bureaucratic growth. Today's bureaucratic paranoia has indeed been institutionalized by what has been popularized as Vice President Cheney's 1% doctrine:- Even if there is just a 1% of the unimaginable coming due, act as if it is a certainty. It's not about our analysis, as Cheney said, it's about our response. Justified or not, fact based or not, our response is what matters. As to evidence, the bar was set so low that the word itself almost didn't apply. If there was even a 1% chance of terrorists getting a weapon of mass destruction, the United States must act now as if it were a certainty. This doctrine is a license for untrammeled expansion of the secret deep state.”||Peter Dale Scott|
|Deep state/2017 Popularisation||“Though the deep state is sometimes discussed as a shadowy conspiracy, it helps to think of it instead as a political conflict between a nation’s leader and its governing institutions.”||16 February 2017|
|Euan Grant||“I have the responsibility for increasing awareness of Russian, Russian speaking and Russian proxies organised crime links ith [sic.] these countries [sic.] “Deep States” nexus of political, senior bureaucracy, military and military industrial complex, big business and, of course, security and intelligence services. We prefer the term “ strategic organised crime” and believe it is not capable of being adequately deterred by conventional criminal justice procedures.”||Euan Grant||June 2018|
|Malcolm Muggeridge||“In the eyes of posterity it will inevitably seem that, in safeguarding our freedom, we destroyed it. The vast clandestine apparatus we built up to prove our enemies' resources and intentions only served in the end to confuse our own purposes; that practice of deceiving others for the good of the state led infallibly to our deceiving ourselves; and that vast army of clandestine personnel built up to execute these purposes were soon caught up in the web of their own sick fantasies, with disastrous consequences for them and us.”||Malcolm Muggeridge||May 1966|
|Peggy Noonan||“I have come to wonder if we don’t have what amounts to a deep state within the outer state in the U.S. — a deep state consisting of our intelligence and security agencies, which are so vast and far-flung in their efforts that they themselves don’t fully know who’s in charge and what everyone else is doing.”||Peggy Noonan||28 October 2013|
|Michael Parenti||“When change threatens to rule, then the rules are changed.”||Michael Parenti|
|Theodore Roosevelt||“Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day.”||Theodore Roosevelt|
|US/Deep state||<nowiki>“I join with those who assess the decay of the so-called Pax Americana into ever widening arms build-ups and military violence, in the light of the very similar decay a century ago of the so-called Pax Brittanica. We need to rescind policies that are as visibly detrimental to America and the world today as they were to Britain then. The problem is that Amnerican institutions are again in the grip of collective mania, as they were in the Palmer raids of 1919 and the McCarthy persecutions of the early 1950s. People outside government must work for a redirection of the U.S. government away from mania and illegality, like the awakening that ends the McCarthy era. But to regain control of politics, Americans must learn to understand and cope with the dark forces of the deep state.|
America, I try to suggest at the end [of The American Deep State] has like Britain far more to contribute to the world than violent power.”</nowiki>
|Peter Dale Scott||2015|
|Document:5 July Seminar; Potential guest list for discussion||spooky seminar invitation list||26 February 2016||Integrity Initiative||Seminar with a mix of media, academics and lots of spooks|
|Document:American War Machine||book introduction||1 November 2010||Peter Dale Scott||A precis of the entire book, an analysis of the hidden mechanisms behind the exercise of real power in the Western World. The book is a culmination and synthesis of all of the author's earlier work on 'Deep Events' and the 'Deep State. Together with the work of Ola Tunander on the same subjects, it is a highly recommended for anyone seeking more than superficial understanding of the predicament of 21st Century humanity.|
|Document:Anatomy of the Deep State||essay||21 February 2014||Mike Lofgren||An up to date analysis of the deep state in the US from a former insider who does not oppose the official narrative of 9-11.|
|Document:Bloggers Under Siege - Craig Murray Charged with Contempt of Court||blog post||27 April 2020||Ludwig De Braeckeleer||From Lockerbie to the Russia Hoax, Craig Murray has of course upset people in high-places, including some who work for Intelligence Agencies.|
|Document:Counter-Intelligence: Spying Deters Democracy||interview||7 July 2014||Scott Noble|
|Document:Democratic State v Deep State||essay||1 January 2008||Ola Tunander||An excellent introduction to deep politics. By clarifying the real role of the Secret Intelligence Services and the policy agenda they under firm control in most Western 'Democracies' (especially the UKUSA nations), it demonstrates the irrelevance of the party-political masquerade.|
|Document:Fifty Years of the Deep State||book||22 November 2013||Mark Gorton||A detailed overview of the modern US deep state which names names, the most prominent of which, George H. W. Bush, is exposed as the kingpin of the US Deep state and probable a key mover behind the 9/11 plot.|
|Document:Obama’s Humanitarianism as Window-Dressing for the US “Deep State” Agenda - The Case of Syria||article||18 June 2013||Elizabeth Woodworth|
|Document:The Deep State and 9/11||article||11 June 2008||Peter Dale Scott|
|Document:The Spectacle of The False Flag||book||1 March 2015||Eric Wilson|
|Document:The Terror Attacks in France. The Broader Geopolitical Implications||interview||10 January 2015||Umberto Pascali||Interview with Umberto Pascali – For Voice of the People, TV Sonce, Skipje, Macedonia|
|Document:Transnationalised Repression Parafascism and the US||article||September 1986||Peter Dale Scott|
- A Wordnado of Words in 2013, New York Times, December 21, 2013. Grant Barrett
- The 'Deep State' Confronts the Accountability Revolution, 2012 | saved at Archive.is
- Deep State - Inside the government secrecy industry by Mark Ambinder & D. B. Grady admits the existence of a black budget in the USA but makes no mention of False flag attacks and declares "the Kennedy assassination... the shallow end of the insanity pool — a place where otherwise reasonable thinkers can wade in unreasonable ideas... There was no cover-up. There was no conspiracy... But the nature of state secrecy ensures that there will always be conspiracy theorists. Kennedy is but one in a list that grows every day, despite the pesky meddling of the duo of logic and facts." pp.96 - 100
- http://ivomosley.com/in-the-name-of-the-people/ In The Name Of The People
- The "Deep State" behind U.S. democracy - Voltaire Network 6 April 2011
- The attempts to cover up 9-11 are clear evidence of this
- Document:The State, the Deep State, and the Wall Street Overworld
- See Operation Mockingbird
- Blind Turk Is Going to Jail To Find Freedom, He Says, The first New York Times article to mention the "deep state", from 1997
- The Supranational Deep State, 2 hour radio show
- Document:The Coup of '63, Part 1
- Document:Fifty Years of the Deep State
- Document:Collateral Damage 911