Difference between revisions of "SDS"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Redirected page to Supranational deep state)
 
(Important topic)
Tag: Removed redirect
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT[[Supranational deep state]]
+
{{group
 +
|wikipedia=
 +
|image=Supranational deep state.jpg
 +
|constitutes=Deep state, third rail topic
 +
|subgroups=US/Deep state, UK/Deep state
 +
|start=11 September 2001
 +
|interests=Globalisation, Global drugs trade, Global weapons trade, Propaganda, War on Terror, Terrorism, controlling the narrative, statecraft
 +
|headquarters=Unknown
 +
|abbreviation=SDS
 +
|description=Since the 1970s, the formerly separate [[deep state]]s have gradually integrated and now routinely conspire to subvert governments and international organisations. The collective effort to [[9-11/Cover-up|cover-up]] [[9/11]] saw this emerging supergroup fuse into a single ''Supra''national Deep State, one with direct control over governments, central banks and global trafficking of drugs, weapons, people etc. Its reliance on deception, however, continues to make its long term prospects far from certain.
 +
|predecessors=UK/Deep state, US/Deep state, Israel/Deep state, ...
 +
}}''Not to be confused with national level [[deep state]]s, which together make it up.''
 +
 
 +
The '''Supranational Deep State''' (SDS), or '''''The'' Deep State''' for short, is the alliance of formerly separate [[deep states]] which quickly began to coalesce in the second half of the 20th century, and which were demonstrably fused into a coherent whole by their post-[[9-11]] collaboration. It is ''not'' an alliance of [[executive|business]] or [[military leader]]s or [[politicians]], but of [[deep politician|''deep'' politicians]]. It is not ''inter''-national, but ''supra''-national, that is to say, it has ''de facto'' control over most<ref>This applies particularly to Europe and North America. [[Iran]] has long been prominent among the exceptions - most learly when its leader publicly declared [[9-11]] to be a [[false flag]] attack.</ref> national governments.
 +
 
 +
Deep state groups traditionally try to operate in a stealthy fashion, but since the 2010s the SDS has become increasingly blatant in an effort to force the pace of change. The UK government for example admits to conducting [[secret trials]], while the [[2012 NDAA]] claimed it was legal for the [[US president]] to murder suspects, keep them incommunicado or [[torture]] them<ref>[[Torture research]] is still ongoing in [[Guantanamo Bay]], which -- in spite of his promises to close it -- was expanded under [[Barack Obama]].</ref> without the need to publicly present any evidence of wrongdoing. The SDS is orchestrating the global introduction of ever more [[totalitarian]] measures such as [[universal surveillance]], and the concerted efforts to remove [[civil liberties]] under the "[[war on terror]]" dogma.
 +
 
 +
The group's control over key institutions such as [[intelligence agencies]], the global [[money system]], most [[national]] [[governments]] and the {{ccm}} is unprecedented, although the speed of technical innovation means that their [[control of the narrative]] is uncertain. Their ability to control the public imagination is proving far less convincing in the [[2010s]] than in the decade before. Awareness of this may have been behind the 2016 "[[Fake News Website]]" campaign that was intended to increase faith in {{ccm}}, but which had the opposite effect by promoting awareness of "[[Fake News]]". The SDS' efforts to [[censor the internet]] are ongoing.
 +
 
 +
==History==
 +
{{FA|Supranational deep state/History}}
 +
The phrase "Supranational deep state" was coined by veteran deep politics researcher [[Peter Dale Scott]] to describe the systematic expansion of deep state activity that occurred during the 1970s. He writes that [[The Safari Club]] and [[Le Cercle]] were [[deep state milieux]] that plated a particularly important role in its development{{cn}} although many other groups (such as the [[BCCI]]) played important roles.
 +
 
 +
===Safari Club===
 +
{{FA|Safari Club}}
 +
The Safari Club former was set up, as the [[Saudi intelligence chief]] [[Kamal Adhan]] stated, to avoid the increased congressional oversight of the CIA in the 1970s. Headquartered in [[Africa]], it employed hundreds{{cn}} of the CIA personnel fired by [[Jimmy Carter]]'s purge of the CIA. Since its members included [[spooks]] from a variety of countries, the chance to do each other's dirty work helped evade detection and also circumvent the separate legal restrictions that [[nation states]] had in place to try to limit the power of [[intelligence agencies]].
 +
 
 +
===Le Cercle===
 +
{{FA|Le Cercle}}
 +
Le Cercle is a [[European deep state]] milieux dating back to [[1952]]. As one of (very) few groups capable of carrying out covert [[regime change]] operations in a wide range of Western European nation states, it was a key component of the European-based alliance of deep state groups that gradually coalesced to become a covert alliance with an international large reach.<ref>[[South Africa]] hosted several meetings, and also helped to fund the group.</ref> Those put in power include such influential politicians as [[Margaret Thatcher]]<ref>By [[Brian Crozier's]] [[Shield]] group</ref>. Other activities included [[arms dealing]] and [[fraud]].{{cn}}
 +
 
 +
====1979 Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism====
 +
{{FA|Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism}}
 +
A nexus of [[deep state operatives]], Le Cercle crossed the Atlantic in 1968 with a meeting in the Rockefeller mansion, and has been met regularly on both sides of the Atlantic ever since. The group spent decades promoting "[[terrorism]]" as a ''crimum exceptum'', a deed so heinous that [[standard operating procedure]] such as [[laws]] and [[trials]] should be circumvented if desired. [[Benjamin Netenyahu's]] 1979 [[Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism]] brought together key operatives of the [[UK/Deep state|UK]], [[US/Deep state|US]] and [[Israeli Deep state]]s and had at least 4 speakers from Le Cercle.<ref>[[Brian Crozier]]</ref> The [[Israeli Deep state]] developed "terrorism" as a justification of its actions in [[Palestine]] while the US [[MICC]] laid the way for the "[[war on terror]]" as a backup [[enemy image]] the purported threat from the [[USSR]] became untenable.<ref> See the [[1985 conference in Washington DC]]</ref>
 +
 
 +
==="Terrorism"===
 +
{{FA|Terrorism}}
 +
In the 1980s, the [[US deep state]] under [[George H. W. Bush]] carried out massive [[fraud]] and [[drug dealing]]. Billions of dollars were invested to systematically corrupt the top echelons of the US government, and to increase its influence worldwide. By the 1990s, the end of the Soviet Union saw a replacement of the [[Cold War]] by a new doctrine of "[[counter-terrorism]]", with dramatic increases in military spending and plans made to invade the [[Middle East]]. By 2001, a ''supra''national alliance of [[deep politician]]s was in place, that kept the truth about the [[9-11]] event from the Western {{ccm}} and collaborated in a global drive towards totalitarian government, under the pretext of the protecting citizens in a "[[global war on terror]]".
 +
 
 +
==September 11, 2001==
 +
{{FA|9-11}}
 +
[[image:|left|333px]]
 +
Just as the [[Coup of 1963]] 'quickened' [[The Cabal]]<ref name=50yq>[[Document:Fifty Years of the Deep State]]</ref>, so the size and complexity of the operation to cover up the crimes of September 11, 2001 may be considered to have 'quickened' the SDS. While international alliances have long existed between deep state groups, they were still fundamentally separate groups. Deals in the days of the [[Safari Club]] were often limited in nature, such as tit-for-tat assassinations traded between [[intelligence agencies]] by [[deep state]] groups to circumventing logistical problems and complicate detection by national law enforcement agencies. However, 9-11 took cooperation to another level, since it required years of careful collaboration. It involved many of the US intelligence agencies,{{cn}} the [[Saudi ]], the [[Pakistan]]i [[ISI]], the [[Israel]]i [[Mossad]] and possibly others.
 +
 
 +
9-11 was a game-changer for all those [[group]]s aware of the fraud which chose tacit collaboration with the perpetrators over principled resistance to them. Many individuals, particularly in the intelligence community, were immediately aware that a huge deception was being attempted, but whether out of shock, [[fear]] or other motives, almost<ref>The [[9-11 dissidents]] page lists some who ''did'' publicly speak out.</ref> decided to let the fraud go publicly unremarked on - even those such as the [[corporate media]] or [[law enforcement]] whose duty it was to speak out.
 +
 
 +
===Official narratives===
 +
{{FA|9-11/Official narrative|}}
 +
Although it was purportedly a surprise attack, the western {{ccm}} were both quick<ref>Most cororate media announbced this within hours rather than days.</ref> and uniform to promote the US government's "Bin laden did it, case closed" story. The first formal statement of the [[official narrative of 9-11]] was the 2002 report of the committee chaired by [[Operation 40]] member [[Porter Goss]] and [[Bob Graham]]. After this was [[19 pages|censored]] and deemed unsatisfactory, the [[9-11/Commission]] was set up to confirm this conclusion.
 +
 
 +
Inconsistencies have been clear for anyone who choose to study the event (for example, the [[FBI]] stated in 2007 that they had seen no credible evidence that implicated [[Ossama bin Laden]] in the 9/11 event). The first "investigation" by [[NIST]] to establish the US government's party line on what happened to the [[World Trade Centre]] towers didn't even ''mention'' [[WTC7]]{{cn}}, and the [[SEC]] simply declared that Bin Laden was not connected to the highly supsicious trades in the run up to 9-11 and summarily destroyed all records of their investigation (although a lot of evidence of a massive financial fraud exists).
 +
 
 +
In spite of these potential difficulties for the SDS, few people (and even fewer US citizens) were emotionally ready to think critically about it at the time. Nevertheless, unsure that [[US Congress]] would go along with the [[PATRIOT Act]], the SDS released the [[Amerithrax]] letters. By the end of 2001, the 9/11 event had worked as a tool for both lanching wars abroad and for [[militarising]] US society. Crucially, its flimsy "Bin Laden did it" story had never been subjected to serious questioning, either by international groups or by a national government.
 +
 
 +
===Cover-up===
 +
{{FA|9-11/Cover-up}}
 +
The [[cover-up of 9-11]] built on lessons learned from other [[false flag]] attacks such as the [[OKC bombing]]. It relied on the fact that most US citizens would be so traumatised that they would not be thinking clearly. The mainstay of the 9-11 was the speedy subjugation of dissidenting reports by [[corporate mass media]]. Corporate media reports of the day itself are almost all still available online and remain a useful resource for researchers. The [[BBC]], for example, carried reports of bombs going off in the [[World Trade Center]], and as of 2020, these reports are still on Youtube{{cn}}. However, by 9/12 big media was under close enough [[Corporate media/Deep state control|deep state control]] that its coverage was limited to endless repeats of a narrow range of carefully selected reports that were designed to deepen and prolong the audience's state of shock. The [[US Deep state]] had proved to the satisfaction of most informed observers that it was determined to throw its weight behind an audacious cover up.
 +
 
 +
====Premature deaths====
 +
{{FA|9-11/Premature deaths}}
 +
The most immediate challenge to the cover up was presented by public dissenters on the corporate media itself. [[Hiroshi Hasegawa]], a respected Japanese "[[terror expert]]" urged listeners to question the US government's story on 9/11 itselfl
 +
';'
 +
''
 +
l;. Over the following years, the Supranational Deep state's death squads (possibly under the direction of [[Richard Cheney]]{{cn}}) solved the problems presented by [[witnesses]] to inconvenient truths and [[journalist]]s who would not be intimidated into silence.
 +
 
 +
===Truth movement===
 +
{{FA|9-11/Truth movement}}
 +
Back in 2001, the [[World Wide Web]] was much less used than it is today, more anarchic, disorganised, less regulated and harder to surveil. Such an environment facilitated the publishing of content which challenged the {{on}} on 9/11, including [[leak]]s from insiders. Technologically, the [[internet]] is much less suited to hierarchical control and [[censorship]] than old media such as [[television]] or [[newspapers]]. The 9/11 planners, back in the 1980s, can hardly have foreseen this challenge to the cover-up.
 +
 
 +
The evidence of a massive 9/11 cover-up, once grasped, is so compelling that few people stick can believe the US government story once they seriously give it a look.<ref>It you are new to the event, you may wish to reflect on whether 2 planes could possibly totally destroy 3 [[WTC7/Destruction|buildings]], as the US government have claimed, or why the sudden and total [[destruction of WTC7]] was announced by various corporate media outlets ''before'' it happened.</ref> Since people do gradually influence their friends, a population with initially only a few dissenters (and there were very ''few'' active dissenters on the day itself) may nevertheless eventually become dominated by sceptics. The truth will out. As of 2020 the SDS had been ramping up [[internet censorship]] for years, although most people were already doubtful about its [[9-11 official narrative]].
 +
 
 +
[[image:MOD_misdirection.jpg|left|584px|thumbnail|The SDS is having an ever harder time suppressing the truth. How to do so in the 21<sup>st</sup> century remains a subject of intense research.<ref>For example, [[Operation Iris]], which came to lifht after the [[Integrity Initiative leak]].</ref>]]
 +
 
 +
==Modus operandi==
 +
The covert global organisation of The Deep State is in contrast to the {{on}} of [[nation states]] which declares that they are sovereign entities with long standing and complex -- and often antagonistic -- patterns of inter-relationship. This gives the SDS a wealth of opportunities for misdirection. Control of two apparently hostile governments allows it to play both sides in disputes and to [[control the narrative]] by [[framing the debate]].
 +
 
 +
One particularly simple strategy is just to present of its preferred policy as a ''fait accompli'' by having multiple governments quickly come out in favour of it, with backup by the {{ccm}}. This would explain why, in spite of its obvious weaknesses, there has been almost no government dissent from the "war on terror" narrative - from [[Washington]] to [[Moscow]] to [[Delhi]] to [[Beijing]]. The claim that nowadays "anything is permissible in the cause of fighting terrorism" flies in the face of centuries of history, but it is a very convenient common denominator for deep state groups, allied or not, to agree.
 +
 
 +
==="The Global War On Terror"===
 +
{{FA|The War On Terror}}
 +
Many nation states in the 21<sup>st</sup> century have marched in lock step to embrace the "[[War On Terror]]" as introduced by the US government in the days after 9/11, giving the impression that such a response was inevitable, or at least understandable. Since the case that the threat posed by "[[Islamic terror]]" in any way justifies a massive social relocation is extremely weak, it has never really been made as such; the [[controled media]] has had very little (if any) ''serious'' debate about "[[terrorism]]". The supranational deep state have an advanced playbook for enforcing acquiescence and subverting [[standard operating procedure]], helping to explain why so few people have publicly questioned the "War on terror" [[official narrative]].
 +
 
 +
====News blackout about the facts of 9/11====
 +
Whatever they said in private, few Western politicians  had the integrity and courage to publicy denouce the 9/11 event.<ref>Exceptions include [[Cynthia McKinney]] and [[Laurent Louis]]</ref> Government leaders have been even more reticent - [[Iranian President]] [[Mahmoud Ahmadinejad‎ ]] being possibly the only national leader to have publicly declared while in office that the exercise a massive [[fraud]]. With very occasional exceptions,<ref>Such as [[Richard Gage]]'s interview on [[C-SPAN]]</ref> [[television]] limits its coverage to [[hit pieces]] which poke fun at [[9-11 dissidents]] and do air their serious points. Corporate [[newspapers]] too have generally followed suit. After [[Steven Sizer]] linked to it in a [[Facebook]] post, Wikispooks' "[[9-11/Israel did it]]" page was the subject of much scorn but few links from [[corporate media]], who although quick to accuse the website of "[[anti-semitism]]" were unwilling to let their audience see it first hand by actually linjking to it.
 +
 
 +
[[Italy]]'s largest daily newspaper, ''[[Corriera della Serra]]'' deserves particular credit for publishing [[Francesco Cossiga]], who forthrightly denounced the attack, claiming moreover that every [[intelligence agency]] in the world knew for sure it was a [[false flag]]. Cossiga was arguing by implication that every intelligence agency was tacitly collaborating, a charge of staggering implications. He was [[Italian Prime Minister|Prime Minister]] of [[Italy]], a country which saw hundreds of civilians killed in the '[[Years of Lead]]', a campaign of bombings and assassinations by [[Operation Gladio]]. A European wide operation, it involved thousands of people, and carried out its murderous business in a still unknown number of countries during the forty years or so when the network was completely unknown to the public. In 1990 the [[European Parliament]] condemned it, and asked each of its 12 member governments to carry out an investigation into the extent of the group in their country. As of 2014, only 5 out of 12 nations had done so. [[Daniele Ganser]], the leading researcher into Gladio, summarised: "The dog barked loudly, but it didn't bite. Of the eight actions requested by the EU parliament, not one was carried out".<ref>Gladio was run out of [[Brussels]] by [[NATO]], who first denied all knowledge, then ambiguously denied their earlier denial. Most of the key players in Operation Gladio have now died, but anyone seeking to learn more about the event is referred to [[Alan Francovich]]'s [[Operation Gladio (film)|documentary on the topic]], which was broadcast once, on [[BBC2]], in 1992.</ref>
 +
 
 +
===Increasing scepticism===
 +
[[image:Chartoftheday 11551 americans top fears of 2017 n.jpg|left|444px]]
 +
''Prima facia'', there is little evidence to support the implied claim that the collossal expenditure on "[[counter-terrorism]]" is in any way related to the welfare or wishes of citizens. [[Traffic accidents]], which kill hundreds of times as many people, are not, after all, treated with such gravity. [[Air pollution]] and other such preventible causes of disease have killed vastly more. An alert populace might have noticed how the US had both the [[PATRIOT Act]] and the [[Invasion of Afghanistan]] ready to roll immediately 9-11 struck. An alert populace might have noticed the lack of any meaningful debate about how to respond to "terrorism", or the regular failure to carry out even superficial investigations into such [[event]]s. They might have noticed the multiple missteps that surrounded the 9-11 event.<ref>The premature announcement, for example, of the total destruction of [[WTC7]], a specially reinforced 47 storey skyscraper that was never hit by a place -- or the FBI's conclusion that [[anthrax]] used to quell opposition to the PATRIOT Act originated from a US laboratory</ref> At the time, having been exposed to half a century of the wiles of [[Operation Mockingbird]], the US populace were not difficult to fool. The US public - and the public of the world - are becoming more alert to the danger of such blind trust in authorities.<ref>https://www.statista.com/chart/11551/americans-top-fears-of-2017/</ref>
 +
 
 +
===Invasion of Afghanistan===
 +
{{FA|2001 Invasion of Afghanistan}}
 +
In 2001, nominally in response to 9/11, the US lead an already planned invasion of [[Afghanistan]] that was to become the longest [[war]] in US history. Quite apart from hugely inflated military expenditure, the war was to rapidly increase opium production, and turn the country into a "vast, lawless [[opium]] farm, dotted with NATO military bases".<ref>[[Tony Gosling]], BCFM, 2018-05-25</ref>
 +
 
 +
==The future==
 +
The future for the [[supranational deep state]] is uncertain. On the one hand, with the possible exception of the [[internet]], it ''currently'' has unparalleled control over the key institutions of modern society. On the other, it is living a lie. On a finite planet, markets ''cannot'' keep expanding indefinitely. The US is in no real sense a [[democracy]] and almost everyone there knows it. The supranational deep state is at this minute destroying the ''real'' world that you and I need to live, while a lot of its control exists only in the ''imaginary'' world of [[money]], [[licences]], [[laws]] and [[CIA Inspector General]]s. In an age of rapidly increasing awareness about how the geopolitical world ''really'' works, the mendocracy of the supranational deep state looks an increasingly risky bet.
 +
 
 +
Back in 2001, it was certainly shocking that [[19 men with boxcutters]] could overcome the US' defences and wreak such horrific destruction. However, the alternative explanation that the majority of the world's governments and media might be able to secretly collude on such a grand scale to hide the truth was unthinkable for most people. While confidence in the average politician may not have been very high, people did general have faith in ''politics'', in the system as a whole. Few would have agreed that "top politicians" and "business leaders" were routinely controlled by the [[blackmail]], [[deception]] & [[violence]] of a tiny, globally organised, amoral elite.
 +
 
 +
Post [[2008]], the economic system is looking more and more like a naked kleptocracy. The "[[war on terror]]", so vital after September 11, 2001 is looking implausible and tired. Even judges are starting to question the fig leaf of "[[national security]]" that is routinely trotted out to hide glitches in the democratic matrix.
 +
 
 +
Meanwhile, the same technologies which speeded its development have also globalised resistance against the supranational deep state. Originally developed during the [[Cold War]] to withstand a nuclear exchange with the [[Societ Union]], the [[internet]] remains a great hope of [[peace activists]] seeking to end the era of [[perpetual war]].
 +
 
 +
In spite of increasing efforts to change them, key social institutions such as the [[electoral]], [[financial]], [[political]] and [[legal]] systems remain ossified. One is reminded of a quote of the late [[John Francis Kennedy]], that {{SMW
 +
|text=Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable
 +
|authors=John F. Kennedy
 +
|format=inline
 +
|source_name=
 +
|source_URL=
 +
}}
 +
 
 +
==Policies==
 +
{{FA|SDS/Policies}}
 +
The supranational deep state is actively pursuing [[social engineering]] on a global scale. Since it has control over the world's money systems<ref>Through institutions such as the [[Bank of International Settlements]], the [[World Bank]] and [[central banks]]</ref> it has been pursuing an agenda of [[financialisation]] -- expanding the spheres of influence of money. This has resulted in a [[neoconservative]] policy of aggressive [[privatisation]] and economic [[globalisation]]. The desire to facilitate global control has lead to the creating ''supra''national bodies to which governments must adhere.
 +
 
 +
While control over money and banking comes a commanding hand in the context of legal businesses, and the SDS controls a large portfolio of illegal businesses such as the majority of the [[global weapons trade]] and the [[global drugs trade]] (most notably through the [[CIA/Drug trafficking|CIA]]). National governments, in theory at least, are not accountable to money but to their populations -- and have therefore been subjected to clandestine subversion by the SDS to keep them in line.
 +
 
 +
===Privatisation===
 +
{{FA|Privatisation}}
 +
In the 1980s the SDS agressively advanced an agenda of [[privatisation]], not only for economic gain, but to shrink the limits of public accountability and provide extra layers of plausible deniability. Few of these people clearly understand their roles as [[deep state operatives]], effective cutouts of the SDS.
 +
 
 +
===Global Drug Trade===
 +
{{FA|Global Drug Trade}}
 +
The [[US deep state]]'s CIA deserves a special mention in this area. It took over the [[heroin]] trade of the [[Golden Triangle]] in 1955/56, and has been a major player in the global drug trade ever since. Subsequent operations which increased drug profits included the [[Vietnam War]], [[Plan Colombia]] and the [[Invasion of Afghanistan]]. The "[[War on Drugs]]" continues to protect profits by stifling competition, working also as a [[strategy of tension]] and filler of the [[US Prison]] system.
 +
 
 +
===Global Weapons Trade===
 +
{{FA|Global Weapons Trade}}
 +
The [[US government]] has an "''über''-dominant role in the global trade in weapons"<ref name=tsw>''[[The Shadow World]]'', [[Andrew Feinstein]]</ref>, and [[US Deep state]] has controlled the [[US Presidency]] since [[Ronald Reagan]]'s defeat of [[Jimmy Carter]] in 1980. International arms deals are all but impossible without the collaboration of the SDS' [[intelligence agencies]].<ref name=tsw/>
 +
{{SMWQ
 +
|format=inline
 +
|text=The United States, while announcing record levels of foreign military sales, effectively pulled the plug on the internernational arms trade treaty being negotiated at the UN in July 2012, despite at least ninety countries wanting to sign up to an adequate, if not inspiring draft text.
 +
|ref_name=tsw
 +
|source_name=The Shadow World
 +
|authors=Andrew Feinstein
 +
|date=9 August 2012
 +
|subjects=Arms Trade, US, 2012
 +
}}
 +
 
 +
===Propaganda===
 +
{{FA|Propaganda}}
 +
By the close of the 20th century, the [[deep state control over corporate media]] in USA was nearly complete, following a huge [[consolidation of big media]]. [[Radio]], [[television]], [[newspapers]] and billboards - all had been brought under the hierarchical control of global [[capitalism]]. The [[world wide web]], however, was a black swan. The ability of people to seek out information from an effectively unlimited number of sources necessitated a major rethink by The Deep State propagandists, one which is still ongoing.
 +
 
 +
A number of illadvised efforts have boomeranged (most recently the "[[fake news website]]" meme) and highlight that 20<sup>th</sup> century thinking can be a counterproductive means to try to influence people -- a lesson that the would be organisers of [[Cold War 2.0]] appear not to have learned. It remains a moot point whether it will prove possible to corall public opinion in the age of the internet.
 +
 
 +
==Limits of control==
 +
This article states that ''most'' national governments are controlled by the SDS, immediately raising the question as to which governments can be considered free of its control. The "[[war on terror]]" and the [[9-11]] event are a useful touchstone here -- these {{on}}s are so central to the SDS agenda, that criticism of them is probably a reliable indicator of independence.
 +
 
 +
===Global influence===
 +
The Deep State's ''influence'' is more or less everywhere. Which modern language has no equivalent of the phrase "[[conspiracy theorist]]"? i.e. A phrase which simultaneously refers to:
 +
# a person researching secret collaboration by influential people
 +
# a person with crazy ideas
 +
Polyglot readers aware of any such language are invited to contribute their knowledge.
 +
 
 +
==Truth and reconciliation?==
 +
{{FA|Truth and reconciliation}}
 +
One way that the leaders of the SDS may seek to resolve the apparently growing instability of the current status quo -- whereby people appear to be using exponentially increasing amounts of violence -- would be to launch a [[truth and reconciliation]] commission. This is a strategy of dealing with situations in which a nation state's government has been so thoroughly criminalised that there seems no realistic prospect of seeking [[retributive justice]]. The concept is familiar to nation peoples in many areas of the world, but has not figured prominently in the Anglophone or European discourse. It has however been tried with success in the recent past in [[South Africa]] and [[Peru]].
 +
{{SMWDocs}}
 +
==References==
 +
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 17:38, 27 March 2020

Group.png SDS
(Deep state, Third rail topic)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Supranational deep state.jpg
AbbreviationSDS
Predecessor• UK Deep state.jpg UK/Deep state
• The cabal.jpg US/Deep state
•  Israel/Deep state
• SMW.png [[..|...]]
Formation11 September 2001
HeadquartersUnknown
Subgroups• The cabal.jpg US/Deep state
• UK Deep state.jpg UK/Deep state
InterestsGlobalisation, Global drugs trade, Global weapons trade, Propaganda, “War on Terror”, “Terrorism”, controlling the narrative, statecraft
Interest of'Somebitchtoldme', Joe Atwill, Below Gotham Labs, Derrick Broze, James Corbett, Ryan Dawson, Dollar Vigilante, Aaron Dykes, Melissa Dykes, Myron Fagan, Robert Gore, Mark Gorton, Tony Gosling, Michael B. Green, Richard Hall, Hang The Bankers, Katherine Horton, Jim Keith, Stanley Monteith, Amazing Polly, Joël van der Reijden, Harold Wallace Rosenthal, Ralph Schoenman, Yoichi Shimatsu, David Stockman, Maram Susli, The Last American Vagabond, Harry Vox, Alan Watt, Aleksander Milosz Zielinski
Founder of"War on Terror", Black site, Platformization, PropOrNot, QAnon
Exposed byScott Bennett, Sibel Edmonds, Gawker, Kees van der Pijl, Joël van der Reijden, Kevin Shipp, State Sovereignty
SubpageSDS/Activities
SDS/Exposure
SDS/Policies
Since the 1970s, the formerly separate deep states have gradually integrated and now routinely conspire to subvert governments and international organisations. The collective effort to cover-up 9/11 saw this emerging supergroup fuse into a single Supranational Deep State, one with direct control over governments, central banks and global trafficking of drugs, weapons, people etc. Its reliance on deception, however, continues to make its long term prospects far from certain.

Not to be confused with national level deep states, which together make it up.

The Supranational Deep State (SDS), or The Deep State for short, is the alliance of formerly separate deep states which quickly began to coalesce in the second half of the 20th century, and which were demonstrably fused into a coherent whole by their post-9-11 collaboration. It is not an alliance of business or military leaders or politicians, but of deep politicians. It is not inter-national, but supra-national, that is to say, it has de facto control over most[1] national governments.

Deep state groups traditionally try to operate in a stealthy fashion, but since the 2010s the SDS has become increasingly blatant in an effort to force the pace of change. The UK government for example admits to conducting secret trials, while the 2012 NDAA claimed it was legal for the US president to murder suspects, keep them incommunicado or torture them[2] without the need to publicly present any evidence of wrongdoing. The SDS is orchestrating the global introduction of ever more totalitarian measures such as universal surveillance, and the concerted efforts to remove civil liberties under the "war on terror" dogma.

The group's control over key institutions such as intelligence agencies, the global money system, most national governments and the commercially-controlled media is unprecedented, although the speed of technical innovation means that their control of the narrative is uncertain. Their ability to control the public imagination is proving far less convincing in the 2010s than in the decade before. Awareness of this may have been behind the 2016 "Fake News Website" campaign that was intended to increase faith in commercially-controlled media, but which had the opposite effect by promoting awareness of "Fake News". The SDS' efforts to censor the internet are ongoing.

History

Full article: Supranational deep state/History

The phrase "Supranational deep state" was coined by veteran deep politics researcher Peter Dale Scott to describe the systematic expansion of deep state activity that occurred during the 1970s. He writes that The Safari Club and Le Cercle were deep state milieux that plated a particularly important role in its development[citation needed] although many other groups (such as the BCCI) played important roles.

Safari Club

Full article: Safari Club

The Safari Club former was set up, as the Saudi intelligence chief Kamal Adhan stated, to avoid the increased congressional oversight of the CIA in the 1970s. Headquartered in Africa, it employed hundreds[citation needed] of the CIA personnel fired by Jimmy Carter's purge of the CIA. Since its members included spooks from a variety of countries, the chance to do each other's dirty work helped evade detection and also circumvent the separate legal restrictions that nation states had in place to try to limit the power of intelligence agencies.

Le Cercle

Full article: Rated 5/5 Le Cercle

Le Cercle is a European deep state milieux dating back to 1952. As one of (very) few groups capable of carrying out covert regime change operations in a wide range of Western European nation states, it was a key component of the European-based alliance of deep state groups that gradually coalesced to become a covert alliance with an international large reach.[3] Those put in power include such influential politicians as Margaret Thatcher[4]. Other activities included arms dealing and fraud.[citation needed]

1979 Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism

Full article: Rated 3/5 Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism

A nexus of deep state operatives, Le Cercle crossed the Atlantic in 1968 with a meeting in the Rockefeller mansion, and has been met regularly on both sides of the Atlantic ever since. The group spent decades promoting "terrorism" as a crimum exceptum, a deed so heinous that standard operating procedure such as laws and trials should be circumvented if desired. Benjamin Netenyahu's 1979 Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism brought together key operatives of the UK, US and Israeli Deep states and had at least 4 speakers from Le Cercle.[5] The Israeli Deep state developed "terrorism" as a justification of its actions in Palestine while the US MICC laid the way for the "war on terror" as a backup enemy image the purported threat from the USSR became untenable.[6]

"Terrorism"

Full article: “Terrorism”

In the 1980s, the US deep state under George H. W. Bush carried out massive fraud and drug dealing. Billions of dollars were invested to systematically corrupt the top echelons of the US government, and to increase its influence worldwide. By the 1990s, the end of the Soviet Union saw a replacement of the Cold War by a new doctrine of "counter-terrorism", with dramatic increases in military spending and plans made to invade the Middle East. By 2001, a supranational alliance of deep politicians was in place, that kept the truth about the 9-11 event from the Western commercially-controlled media and collaborated in a global drive towards totalitarian government, under the pretext of the protecting citizens in a "global war on terror".

September 11, 2001

Full article: Rated 4/5 9-11

[[image:|left|333px]] Just as the Coup of 1963 'quickened' The Cabal[7], so the size and complexity of the operation to cover up the crimes of September 11, 2001 may be considered to have 'quickened' the SDS. While international alliances have long existed between deep state groups, they were still fundamentally separate groups. Deals in the days of the Safari Club were often limited in nature, such as tit-for-tat assassinations traded between intelligence agencies by deep state groups to circumventing logistical problems and complicate detection by national law enforcement agencies. However, 9-11 took cooperation to another level, since it required years of careful collaboration. It involved many of the US intelligence agencies,[citation needed] the Saudi , the Pakistani ISI, the Israeli Mossad and possibly others.

9-11 was a game-changer for all those groups aware of the fraud which chose tacit collaboration with the perpetrators over principled resistance to them. Many individuals, particularly in the intelligence community, were immediately aware that a huge deception was being attempted, but whether out of shock, fear or other motives, almost[8] decided to let the fraud go publicly unremarked on - even those such as the corporate media or law enforcement whose duty it was to speak out.

Official narratives

Full article: 9-11/Official narrative

Although it was purportedly a surprise attack, the western commercially-controlled media were both quick[9] and uniform to promote the US government's "Bin laden did it, case closed" story. The first formal statement of the official narrative of 9-11 was the 2002 report of the committee chaired by Operation 40 member Porter Goss and Bob Graham. After this was censored and deemed unsatisfactory, the 9-11/Commission was set up to confirm this conclusion.

Inconsistencies have been clear for anyone who choose to study the event (for example, the FBI stated in 2007 that they had seen no credible evidence that implicated Ossama bin Laden in the 9/11 event). The first "investigation" by NIST to establish the US government's party line on what happened to the World Trade Centre towers didn't even mention WTC7[citation needed], and the SEC simply declared that Bin Laden was not connected to the highly supsicious trades in the run up to 9-11 and summarily destroyed all records of their investigation (although a lot of evidence of a massive financial fraud exists).

In spite of these potential difficulties for the SDS, few people (and even fewer US citizens) were emotionally ready to think critically about it at the time. Nevertheless, unsure that US Congress would go along with the PATRIOT Act, the SDS released the Amerithrax letters. By the end of 2001, the 9/11 event had worked as a tool for both lanching wars abroad and for militarising US society. Crucially, its flimsy "Bin Laden did it" story had never been subjected to serious questioning, either by international groups or by a national government.

Cover-up

Full article: 9-11/Cover-up

The cover-up of 9-11 built on lessons learned from other false flag attacks such as the OKC bombing. It relied on the fact that most US citizens would be so traumatised that they would not be thinking clearly. The mainstay of the 9-11 was the speedy subjugation of dissidenting reports by corporate mass media. Corporate media reports of the day itself are almost all still available online and remain a useful resource for researchers. The BBC, for example, carried reports of bombs going off in the World Trade Center, and as of 2020, these reports are still on Youtube[citation needed]. However, by 9/12 big media was under close enough deep state control that its coverage was limited to endless repeats of a narrow range of carefully selected reports that were designed to deepen and prolong the audience's state of shock. The US Deep state had proved to the satisfaction of most informed observers that it was determined to throw its weight behind an audacious cover up.

Premature deaths

Full article: 9-11/Premature deaths

The most immediate challenge to the cover up was presented by public dissenters on the corporate media itself. Hiroshi Hasegawa, a respected Japanese "terror expert" urged listeners to question the US government's story on 9/11 itselfl ';' l;. Over the following years, the Supranational Deep state's death squads (possibly under the direction of Richard Cheney[citation needed]) solved the problems presented by witnesses to inconvenient truths and journalists who would not be intimidated into silence.

Truth movement

Full article: 9-11/Truth movement

Back in 2001, the World Wide Web was much less used than it is today, more anarchic, disorganised, less regulated and harder to surveil. Such an environment facilitated the publishing of content which challenged the official narrative on 9/11, including leaks from insiders. Technologically, the internet is much less suited to hierarchical control and censorship than old media such as television or newspapers. The 9/11 planners, back in the 1980s, can hardly have foreseen this challenge to the cover-up.

The evidence of a massive 9/11 cover-up, once grasped, is so compelling that few people stick can believe the US government story once they seriously give it a look.[10] Since people do gradually influence their friends, a population with initially only a few dissenters (and there were very few active dissenters on the day itself) may nevertheless eventually become dominated by sceptics. The truth will out. As of 2020 the SDS had been ramping up internet censorship for years, although most people were already doubtful about its 9-11 official narrative.

File:MOD misdirection.jpg
The SDS is having an ever harder time suppressing the truth. How to do so in the 21st century remains a subject of intense research.[11]

Modus operandi

The covert global organisation of The Deep State is in contrast to the official narrative of nation states which declares that they are sovereign entities with long standing and complex -- and often antagonistic -- patterns of inter-relationship. This gives the SDS a wealth of opportunities for misdirection. Control of two apparently hostile governments allows it to play both sides in disputes and to control the narrative by framing the debate.

One particularly simple strategy is just to present of its preferred policy as a fait accompli by having multiple governments quickly come out in favour of it, with backup by the commercially-controlled media. This would explain why, in spite of its obvious weaknesses, there has been almost no government dissent from the "war on terror" narrative - from Washington to Moscow to Delhi to Beijing. The claim that nowadays "anything is permissible in the cause of fighting terrorism" flies in the face of centuries of history, but it is a very convenient common denominator for deep state groups, allied or not, to agree.

"The Global War On Terror"

Full article: The War On Terror

Many nation states in the 21st century have marched in lock step to embrace the "War On Terror" as introduced by the US government in the days after 9/11, giving the impression that such a response was inevitable, or at least understandable. Since the case that the threat posed by "Islamic terror" in any way justifies a massive social relocation is extremely weak, it has never really been made as such; the controled media has had very little (if any) serious debate about "terrorism". The supranational deep state have an advanced playbook for enforcing acquiescence and subverting standard operating procedure, helping to explain why so few people have publicly questioned the "War on terror" official narrative.

News blackout about the facts of 9/11

Whatever they said in private, few Western politicians had the integrity and courage to publicy denouce the 9/11 event.[12] Government leaders have been even more reticent - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad‎ being possibly the only national leader to have publicly declared while in office that the exercise a massive fraud. With very occasional exceptions,[13] television limits its coverage to hit pieces which poke fun at 9-11 dissidents and do air their serious points. Corporate newspapers too have generally followed suit. After Steven Sizer linked to it in a Facebook post, Wikispooks' "9-11/Israel did it" page was the subject of much scorn but few links from corporate media, who although quick to accuse the website of "anti-semitism" were unwilling to let their audience see it first hand by actually linjking to it.

Italy's largest daily newspaper, Corriera della Serra deserves particular credit for publishing Francesco Cossiga, who forthrightly denounced the attack, claiming moreover that every intelligence agency in the world knew for sure it was a false flag. Cossiga was arguing by implication that every intelligence agency was tacitly collaborating, a charge of staggering implications. He was Prime Minister of Italy, a country which saw hundreds of civilians killed in the 'Years of Lead', a campaign of bombings and assassinations by Operation Gladio. A European wide operation, it involved thousands of people, and carried out its murderous business in a still unknown number of countries during the forty years or so when the network was completely unknown to the public. In 1990 the European Parliament condemned it, and asked each of its 12 member governments to carry out an investigation into the extent of the group in their country. As of 2014, only 5 out of 12 nations had done so. Daniele Ganser, the leading researcher into Gladio, summarised: "The dog barked loudly, but it didn't bite. Of the eight actions requested by the EU parliament, not one was carried out".[14]

Increasing scepticism

Chartoftheday 11551 americans top fears of 2017 n.jpg

Prima facia, there is little evidence to support the implied claim that the collossal expenditure on "counter-terrorism" is in any way related to the welfare or wishes of citizens. Traffic accidents, which kill hundreds of times as many people, are not, after all, treated with such gravity. Air pollution and other such preventible causes of disease have killed vastly more. An alert populace might have noticed how the US had both the PATRIOT Act and the Invasion of Afghanistan ready to roll immediately 9-11 struck. An alert populace might have noticed the lack of any meaningful debate about how to respond to "terrorism", or the regular failure to carry out even superficial investigations into such events. They might have noticed the multiple missteps that surrounded the 9-11 event.[15] At the time, having been exposed to half a century of the wiles of Operation Mockingbird, the US populace were not difficult to fool. The US public - and the public of the world - are becoming more alert to the danger of such blind trust in authorities.[16]

Invasion of Afghanistan

Full article: 2001 Invasion of Afghanistan

In 2001, nominally in response to 9/11, the US lead an already planned invasion of Afghanistan that was to become the longest war in US history. Quite apart from hugely inflated military expenditure, the war was to rapidly increase opium production, and turn the country into a "vast, lawless opium farm, dotted with NATO military bases".[17]

The future

The future for the supranational deep state is uncertain. On the one hand, with the possible exception of the internet, it currently has unparalleled control over the key institutions of modern society. On the other, it is living a lie. On a finite planet, markets cannot keep expanding indefinitely. The US is in no real sense a democracy and almost everyone there knows it. The supranational deep state is at this minute destroying the real world that you and I need to live, while a lot of its control exists only in the imaginary world of money, licences, laws and CIA Inspector Generals. In an age of rapidly increasing awareness about how the geopolitical world really works, the mendocracy of the supranational deep state looks an increasingly risky bet.

Back in 2001, it was certainly shocking that 19 men with boxcutters could overcome the US' defences and wreak such horrific destruction. However, the alternative explanation that the majority of the world's governments and media might be able to secretly collude on such a grand scale to hide the truth was unthinkable for most people. While confidence in the average politician may not have been very high, people did general have faith in politics, in the system as a whole. Few would have agreed that "top politicians" and "business leaders" were routinely controlled by the blackmail, deception & violence of a tiny, globally organised, amoral elite.

Post 2008, the economic system is looking more and more like a naked kleptocracy. The "war on terror", so vital after September 11, 2001 is looking implausible and tired. Even judges are starting to question the fig leaf of "national security" that is routinely trotted out to hide glitches in the democratic matrix.

Meanwhile, the same technologies which speeded its development have also globalised resistance against the supranational deep state. Originally developed during the Cold War to withstand a nuclear exchange with the Societ Union, the internet remains a great hope of peace activists seeking to end the era of perpetual war.

In spite of increasing efforts to change them, key social institutions such as the electoral, financial, political and legal systems remain ossified. One is reminded of a quote of the late John Francis Kennedy, that SMW

Policies

Full article: SDS/Policies

The supranational deep state is actively pursuing social engineering on a global scale. Since it has control over the world's money systems[18] it has been pursuing an agenda of financialisation -- expanding the spheres of influence of money. This has resulted in a neoconservative policy of aggressive privatisation and economic globalisation. The desire to facilitate global control has lead to the creating supranational bodies to which governments must adhere.

While control over money and banking comes a commanding hand in the context of legal businesses, and the SDS controls a large portfolio of illegal businesses such as the majority of the global weapons trade and the global drugs trade (most notably through the CIA). National governments, in theory at least, are not accountable to money but to their populations -- and have therefore been subjected to clandestine subversion by the SDS to keep them in line.

Privatisation

Full article: Privatisation

In the 1980s the SDS agressively advanced an agenda of privatisation, not only for economic gain, but to shrink the limits of public accountability and provide extra layers of plausible deniability. Few of these people clearly understand their roles as deep state operatives, effective cutouts of the SDS.

Global Drug Trade

Full article: Global Drug Trade

The US deep state's CIA deserves a special mention in this area. It took over the heroin trade of the Golden Triangle in 1955/56, and has been a major player in the global drug trade ever since. Subsequent operations which increased drug profits included the Vietnam War, Plan Colombia and the Invasion of Afghanistan. The "War on Drugs" continues to protect profits by stifling competition, working also as a strategy of tension and filler of the US Prison system.

Global Weapons Trade

Full article: Global Weapons Trade

The US government has an "über-dominant role in the global trade in weapons"[19], and US Deep state has controlled the US Presidency since Ronald Reagan's defeat of Jimmy Carter in 1980. International arms deals are all but impossible without the collaboration of the SDS' intelligence agencies.[19] “The United States, while announcing record levels of foreign military sales, effectively pulled the plug on the internernational arms trade treaty being negotiated at the UN in July 2012, despite at least ninety countries wanting to sign up to an adequate, if not inspiring draft text.” [19]

Propaganda

Full article: Propaganda

By the close of the 20th century, the deep state control over corporate media in USA was nearly complete, following a huge consolidation of big media. Radio, television, newspapers and billboards - all had been brought under the hierarchical control of global capitalism. The world wide web, however, was a black swan. The ability of people to seek out information from an effectively unlimited number of sources necessitated a major rethink by The Deep State propagandists, one which is still ongoing.

A number of illadvised efforts have boomeranged (most recently the "fake news website" meme) and highlight that 20th century thinking can be a counterproductive means to try to influence people -- a lesson that the would be organisers of Cold War 2.0 appear not to have learned. It remains a moot point whether it will prove possible to corall public opinion in the age of the internet.

Limits of control

This article states that most national governments are controlled by the SDS, immediately raising the question as to which governments can be considered free of its control. The "war on terror" and the 9-11 event are a useful touchstone here -- these official narratives are so central to the SDS agenda, that criticism of them is probably a reliable indicator of independence.

Global influence

The Deep State's influence is more or less everywhere. Which modern language has no equivalent of the phrase "conspiracy theorist"? i.e. A phrase which simultaneously refers to:

  1. a person researching secret collaboration by influential people
  2. a person with crazy ideas

Polyglot readers aware of any such language are invited to contribute their knowledge.

Truth and reconciliation?

Full article: Truth and reconciliation

One way that the leaders of the SDS may seek to resolve the apparently growing instability of the current status quo -- whereby people appear to be using exponentially increasing amounts of violence -- would be to launch a truth and reconciliation commission. This is a strategy of dealing with situations in which a nation state's government has been so thoroughly criminalised that there seems no realistic prospect of seeking retributive justice. The concept is familiar to nation peoples in many areas of the world, but has not figured prominently in the Anglophone or European discourse. It has however been tried with success in the recent past in South Africa and Peru.

 

Events carried out

EventLocationDescription
2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine/Premature deathEurope
Russia
France
Spain
US
India
Puerto Rico
UK
Premature deaths of mostly Russian businessman during and around when the Russian invasion commenced. There may be Ukrainian and others as well. As the list grows, it appears the men are being targeted in dozens of western countries as well.
9-11New York
US
Washington DC
North America
A complex and spectacular set of events in New York and Washington. The US government was quick to blame Al Qaeda, though no evidence of guilt was presented and there is much suspicion about what Al Qaeda really is. In the USA 9-11 assisted the Patriot Act's roll back of civil liberties, the stepping up of domestic surveillance and the financial advancement of the military industrial complex. Abroad 9-11 helped launched wars on Iraq and Afghanistan that had been planned long before.
9-11/Cover-upA lot of resources have been devoted to containing the truth about the events of September 11th, 2001. However, while it has been more or less kept from television screens, awareness about 9-11 is growing worldwide.
9-11/WTC7/Destruction9-11/WTC7Compared to the WTC Twin Towers, few people have seen video footage of the collapse of the 47-story WTC building 7, but the event was predicted and recorded by at least 3 TV networks and exactly resembles a controlled demolition. The event was subject to a news blackout by commercially controlled media for years afterwards, no mention of WTC7 was made in the 9/11 Commission's final report and Wikipedia has no separate page for this event.
Gladio 3.0Possible new version of Operation Gladio 2.0.
Jovenel Moïse/AssassinationHaitiThe assassination of Haitian President Jovenel Moïse.

 

Examples

Page nameDescription
Director-General
IconoclasmThe destruction of art, images and monuments. A part of Cultural genocide.
MinistryA collective body led by a head of government.

 

A SDS victim on Wikispooks

TitleDescription
David KellyDr David Kelly, a biological weapons expert who died in highly suspicious circumstances

 

Related Quotations

PageQuoteAuthorDate
"Conspiracy theorist"“Here's the thing. There's about 150 people that run the world. Anybody who wants to go into politics, they're all fucking puppets, okay? There are 150 and they're all men that run the world - period, full stop. They control most of the important assets, they control the money flows. And these are not the tech entrepreneurs. Now they are going to get rolled over the next five to ten years by the people that are really underneath pulling the strings. And when you get behind the curtain and see how that world works, what you realize is, it is unfairly set up for them and their progeny. Now, I'm not going to say that that's something that we can rip apart. But first order of business is, I want to break through and be at that table. That's the first order of business.”Chamath Palihapitiya2017
Jacques Attali“The real bourgeoisie running the world is about 1,000 people. They are running capitalism." He reconsiders: "Well, one might say it's 10,000, but no more than that. In a world population of 6.5 billion, that is not very many people”Jacques Attali2006
BIS“The Bank is completely removed from any governmental or political control.”Gates McGarrahMarch 1931
George Carlin“Sooner or later the people in this country are going to realize the government doesn't give a fuck about them. The government doesn't care about you, or your children, or your rights, or your welfare or your safety. It simply doesn't give a fuck about you. It's interested in its own power. That's the only thing...keeping it, and expanding wherever possible.”George Carlin
Deep state“What can now be called “Covid Deep State” – the same “superior and super-rich elite” buys practically all the corporate mediatelevision, radio and print – in basically all the 193 UN member countries. Looks like there is no escape. That’s what they would like. That’s why the entire world had to be locked down for the virus at once on or around the 15th of March 2020.”Peter Koenig4 June 2021
Deep state/2017 Popularisation“There is the visible government situated around the Mall in Washington, and then there is another, more shadowy, more indefinable government that is not explained in Civics 101 or observable to tourists at the White House or the Capitol. The former is traditional Washington partisan politics: the tip of the iceberg that a public watching C-SPAN sees daily and which is theoretically controllable via elections. The subsurface part of the iceberg I shall call the Deep State, which operates according to its own compass heading regardless of who is formally in power.”Mike Lofgren22 February 2014
Document:The Occult Technology of Power“Also at the (SDS) convention, men from Business International Roundtables… tried to buy up some radicals. These are the world's leading industrialists and they convene to decide how our lives are going to go… We were also offered Esso (Rockefeller) money. They want us to make a lot of radical commotion so they can look more in the center as they move to the left.”James Kunen
Document:The State, the Deep State, and the Wall Street Overworld“two governments: the one its citizens were familiar with, operated more or less in the open: the other a parallel top secret government whose parts had mushroomed in less than a decade into a gigantic, sprawling universe of its own, visible to only a carefully vetted cadre – and its entirety... visible only to God.”Dana Priest
William Arkin
2011
Document:The State, the Deep State, and the Wall Street Overworld“the brainchild of Count Alexandre de Marenches, the debonair and mustachioed chief of France’s CIA. The SDECE (Service de Documentation Extérieure et de Contre-Espionnage)... Worried by Soviet and Cuban advances in postcolonial Africa, and by America’s post-Watergate paralysis in the field of undercover activity, the swashbuckling Marenches had come to Turki’s father, King Faisal, with a proposition... [By 1979] Somali president Siad Barre had been bribed out of Soviet embrace by $75 million worth of Egyptian arms (paid for... by Saudi Arabia)”
William Pitt the Elder“A long train of these practices has at length unwillingly convinced me that there is something behind the throne, greater than the throne itself.”William Pitt the Elder1770
Europe/Deep state“A Briton agreed that "supranational consciousness" was not yet very fully developed within the E.C. countries, and thus it was important to avoid the supranational ambitions of the E.C. institutions going too far too fast.”1989
Kevin Flaherty“Since the assassination of John F. Kennedy, an international, crypto-fascist syndicate has been rapidly consolidating its grip on this planet. Changes to the global system have been implemented slowly, consistently and in a manner so subtle that only a tiny fraction of the population in the industrialized world ever noticed anything was wrong...

I view the output of established media as a slurry of manure and toxic waste; a propaganda product that requires heavy analysis and context fitting in order to recover the 5%-10% of useful information contained within an obfuscated mess.

What’s the solution?

The system is in collapse now. This is my best and only advice: Get into a situation that eliminates your reliance on luck and minimizes the impact of factors that are completely beyond your control. Do this immediately.”
Kevin Flaherty
Paranoia“A paranoid is someone who knows a little of what's going on.”William Burroughs1969
SDS/Exposure“The story of Harken fits in perfectly with our eveolving exploration of the Bush family's role in a globally reaching, fundamentally amoral, financial intelligence resource apparatus that has never before been properly documented.”Russ Baker
Harry S. Truman“For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the government.... I never had any thought that when I set up the CIA that it would be injected into peacetime cloak and dagger operations.”Harry S. Truman
Donald Trump“Break with tradition, or so it seems. Vilified by the entire Rockefeller and liberal media establishment, but strong evidence he himself is "conservative CIA". Brought to power by "conservative CIA" CNP financiers/members as the Mercers, Steve Bannon and Kellyanne Conway. Trump himself has many long-standing, curious security state and establishment ties, among them: in December 2000 Trump was part of a 94-guest dinner organized by Bilderberg steering committee-, Pilgrims Society-, and 1001 Club-member Conrad Black, where Trump was seen chatting with Henry Kissinger at a table. Happy Rockefeller, the widow of Nelson Rockefeller; Lynn Forester de Rothschild, Richard Perle, Vernon Jordan and later exposed serial pedophiles Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell all were part of this dinner.”Joël van der Reijden
ISGP
Donald Trump
2020
Woodrow Wilson“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”Woodrow Wilson

 

Events Planned

EventStartEndLocation(s)Description
"COVID-19/Response"The "response" to COVID-19 event appears to have been coordinated globally to effect social change and economic reasons.
2005 London bombings7 July 2005 08:50:007 July 2005 09:47:00London
UK
A series of coordinated attacks on London's public transport system during the morning rush hour, allegedly carried out by four Muslim suicide bombers.
9-11/George Washington Bridge plot11 September 200111 September 2001New York
New Jersey
9-11/George Washington Bridge plot
The FBI arrested at least one van of men (two or three) which was found to contain tons of explosives. This was announced on the day, two conflicting reports, but later retracted. No alternative explanation is known to have been given.
COVID-19/Economy
COVID-19/LockdownMarch 2020WorldNominally caused by a desire to save human life by slowing the spread of COVID-19, the near global campaign to institute lockdowns can also be interpreted as a global power grab by the supranational deep state.

 

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:PayPal Partnering With Anti-Defamation League to Share Info With Law Enforcement, Determine Who Can Use Their ServicesArticle26 July 2021Cassandra FairbanksThe censorship industry colludes with law enforcement and financial services in order to censor more.
Document:Privatization for Dummies – The Nuts & Bolts of The World's Biggest Scamarticle21 March 2019Ronald Thomas West
Document:The State, the Deep State, and the Wall Street Overworldpaper10 March 2014Peter Dale ScottAn recommended and highly referenced overview of the deep state in action centering on the complex milieu of Khashoggi, the BCCI, and the Safari Club.
Document:Venezuela, Iran: Trump And The Deep StateArticle22 May 2019Thierry MeyssanSheikh Hassan Rouhani was the primary contact with the Western powers during the Iran-Contra affair. He knows Elliott Abrams personally and put the US deep state in relation with Ayatollah Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, who became the richest billionaire in Iran thanks to this arms traffic.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References

  1. This applies particularly to Europe and North America. Iran has long been prominent among the exceptions - most learly when its leader publicly declared 9-11 to be a false flag attack.
  2. Torture research is still ongoing in Guantanamo Bay, which -- in spite of his promises to close it -- was expanded under Barack Obama.
  3. South Africa hosted several meetings, and also helped to fund the group.
  4. By Brian Crozier's Shield group
  5. Brian Crozier
  6. See the 1985 conference in Washington DC
  7. Document:Fifty Years of the Deep State
  8. The 9-11 dissidents page lists some who did publicly speak out.
  9. Most cororate media announbced this within hours rather than days.
  10. It you are new to the event, you may wish to reflect on whether 2 planes could possibly totally destroy 3 buildings, as the US government have claimed, or why the sudden and total destruction of WTC7 was announced by various corporate media outlets before it happened.
  11. For example, Operation Iris, which came to lifht after the Integrity Initiative leak.
  12. Exceptions include Cynthia McKinney and Laurent Louis
  13. Such as Richard Gage's interview on C-SPAN
  14. Gladio was run out of Brussels by NATO, who first denied all knowledge, then ambiguously denied their earlier denial. Most of the key players in Operation Gladio have now died, but anyone seeking to learn more about the event is referred to Alan Francovich's documentary on the topic, which was broadcast once, on BBC2, in 1992.
  15. The premature announcement, for example, of the total destruction of WTC7, a specially reinforced 47 storey skyscraper that was never hit by a place -- or the FBI's conclusion that anthrax used to quell opposition to the PATRIOT Act originated from a US laboratory
  16. https://www.statista.com/chart/11551/americans-top-fears-of-2017/
  17. Tony Gosling, BCFM, 2018-05-25
  18. Through institutions such as the Bank of International Settlements, the World Bank and central banks
  19. a b c The Shadow World, Andrew Feinstein Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "tsw" defined multiple times with different content